Comment on N-Obama 08 by eastcoastsurfer12
He may not follow the Hitler's footsteps but in nowadays time he's the next Hitler... you think he's fighting the war in Middle East because of so called ''nuclear weapons'' Iraq has? When you google WWII you'll get the accurate time when Poland was invaded, but why is there nothing on Google about Lybia? When did it happen? Who did it? Why? One of the reasons is oil. Same with Kony, they will attack Uganda because it's one the world's biggest lands with oil. Same like with Lybia and Iran. Who made Kosovo get divided from Serbia? What are they doing there now? Peace force, no man, Kosovo is rich with minerals and iron, evaluated up to $1 billion or more. Why is he different than Hitler when every Tuesday morning when he's having breakfast with his wife and children he choses which ''terrorist'' next to attack with his non-pilot aircraft... and who knows, maybe in the same time that terrorist is having dinner with his 6 children...
(I'm just restating this for the record, I don't follow politics since I don't vote.)
I won't deny that the government's corrupt. That has been an undisputed fact since Caesar's day. However from what I've heard in day to day life and school, most of what you listed above like it was Bush's doing. You know before Obama was president. If Obama has had a hand in any of that, then I haven't heard of it.
Yes, I am aware that the government is more interested in the oil over in the Middle East than anything else, but from what I've heard (and once again, my sources aren't the best in the world) I could've sworn that that the "war" in the Middle East was dying. I don't know about you, but here in California, I've seen countless soldiers around recently. In fact, right around the time Obama made the announcement that the war was over, I've seen more and more people walking around in army fatigues. To me (I don't know about you) but that says that whatever business that was going on over there, is just about over.
Personally, I can't help but feel that if the "war" is going to end, it would be a democrat who is responsible . After all, that seems right up their alley. Secondly, you make it seem like all of this is Obama's doing, but you can't forget that because of the way the government is structured, he can't do anything that congress doesn't vote on. No decision can be blamed on just one person. No, I'm not just defending Obama here, I'm defending all the presidents past who have received such crap for things that they did or didn't do. No, Obama hasn't proven himself to be the best president based on the last four years. That partly has something to do with the fact that it doesn't seem as though the people supported him very much. Should he be re-elected? I don't know, like I said I don't vote. But I can't help but feel that he's given a lot of crap he doesn't deserve.
Maybe you have a different opinion. But from the way I see it (with my limited information) Obama is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps if I put forth a little time to research, my opinion would change. All I can say now is that if I was asked who I would vote for at the moment, I'd probably say Obama. However, I take pride in the fact that I'm not a dumbass, which is why I'm not going to bother voting.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, and (trying) to clarify a little, but I can't help but feel that your argument is not exactly solid.
Sorry for the mini-rant and potentially getting off topic.
I won't deny that the government's corrupt. That has been an undisputed fact since Caesar's day. However from what I've heard in day to day life and school, most of what you listed above like it was Bush's doing. You know before Obama was president. If Obama has had a hand in any of that, then I haven't heard of it.
Yes, I am aware that the government is more interested in the oil over in the Middle East than anything else, but from what I've heard (and once again, my sources aren't the best in the world) I could've sworn that that the "war" in the Middle East was dying. I don't know about you, but here in California, I've seen countless soldiers around recently. In fact, right around the time Obama made the announcement that the war was over, I've seen more and more people walking around in army fatigues. To me (I don't know about you) but that says that whatever business that was going on over there, is just about over.
Personally, I can't help but feel that if the "war" is going to end, it would be a democrat who is responsible . After all, that seems right up their alley. Secondly, you make it seem like all of this is Obama's doing, but you can't forget that because of the way the government is structured, he can't do anything that congress doesn't vote on. No decision can be blamed on just one person. No, I'm not just defending Obama here, I'm defending all the presidents past who have received such crap for things that they did or didn't do. No, Obama hasn't proven himself to be the best president based on the last four years. That partly has something to do with the fact that it doesn't seem as though the people supported him very much. Should he be re-elected? I don't know, like I said I don't vote. But I can't help but feel that he's given a lot of crap he doesn't deserve.
Maybe you have a different opinion. But from the way I see it (with my limited information) Obama is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps if I put forth a little time to research, my opinion would change. All I can say now is that if I was asked who I would vote for at the moment, I'd probably say Obama. However, I take pride in the fact that I'm not a dumbass, which is why I'm not going to bother voting.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, and (trying) to clarify a little, but I can't help but feel that your argument is not exactly solid.
Sorry for the mini-rant and potentially getting off topic.