Comment on gah by doubleleaf

1-commando-of-a-cat's avatar
AC1 was a great game because it allowed you to do so many things with such basic tools and mechanics. I loved the storyline and how realistic it all seemed. I was excited to play AC2 but was immensely disappointed. The storyline was painful to play through with with plotholes here and there, very unrealistic, annoying characters that were a complete joke, hard to take seriously and the combat was a joke... and it was like a heart-weighing poison that I needed AC1 to be an antidote to.

I don't hate Ezio as a character, I just think his story was so far-fetched and unexplained to the point where the story sucked. As in... where did he get his parkour training? Why is he able to kill without getting phased (he's cold, at least Altair was more concerned about his killings)? Why are the "assassins" thieves and murderers when they're meant to help humanity escape tyranny? I also thought the game was very increative.

An other opinion I have is about how many people Ezio is able to kill single-handedly. No man in history without supreme power was able to accomplish that. Whereas Altair's killings had to be in private or were planned precisely. Yes I know it's a videogame and all but I just think AC2 was very poorly done.
Sephi177's avatar
Wtf, seriously?.. SURE AC1 is a great game, just as AC2. They both have their faults and assets. But come on, saying AC2 was increative is ridiculous, knowing they added so much more customization and options to the game. Unexplained? Were the character developments and the fact they even incorporated his family into the game not enough? He is an assassin by blood, driven by vengeance, why wouldn't he fucking kill? Single-handedly? Were you completely unaware of how many fucking people helped the guy? If he was alone he wouldn't have even made it past Florence. It was very well done, and not ignoring the fact that AC1 is still an awesome game.
Sephi177's avatar
Wtf, seriously?.. SURE AC1 is a great game, just as AC2. They both have their faults and assets. But come on, saying AC2 was increative is ridiculous, knowing they added so much more customization and options to the game. Unexplained? Were the character developments and the fact they even incorporated his family into the game not enough? He is an assassin by blood, driven by vengeance, why wouldn't he fucking kill? Single-handedly? Were you completely unaware of how many fucking people helped the guy? If he was alone he wouldn't have even made it past Florence. It was very well done, and not ignoring the fact that AC1 is still an awesome game.
fantasylover100's avatar
You would be surprised how many people on youtube would disagree.
1-commando-of-a-cat's avatar
No, actually, I wouldn't be surprised.