Unfortunately, this page also has many inaccuracies itself regarding the Jurassic Park canon. For one, the Novel raptors are not based on Gregory Paul's "Velociraptor" antirrhopus. Closer inspection reveals that these animals are actually a then unclassified Velociraptor then would later become Achillobator giganticus: [link] This is something that is considered Canon to the Jurassic Park Legacy Encyclopedia, a database that in turn is the only recognized official database for Jurassic Park by Universal themselves.
Then, in the movies, the "Velociraptor" antirrhopus is NOT the real animal. As this image: [link] shows, the real Deinonychus exists in the film, and the animals were genetically altered to represent an image that was generally understood by the public rather than the scientific community. It's a common misconception really. These aren't the dinosaurs that existed 65mya. These are the dinosaurs that have been recreated in modern day, and exist in modern day. They're modern dinosaurs. And people need to realize that these aren't nature's design, they're the design made from humans to match what the public perceived dinosaurs to look like at the time of their cloning.

The Dilophosaurus isn't "too small" it's a juvenile. Simple as that.

The Brachiosaurus isn't "too big", these images: [link] [link] clearly depict an animal's head that is "just about as big as a human upper body" as the Wikipedia article describes.

The "venomous Sinornithosaurus" has actually been disproved to be nothing more than a chipped tooth.

Now, I'm not looking to start anything, just wanna point out why Wikipedia doesn't have everything even though many of us (myself included) often like to think it does.