Comment on Free Snivy Avatar by DunnyCT
I think you mean Smugleaf 
*shot*
Another quality icon though. You're pretty good at these things. The consistent style makes them easily identifiable as your work.
Although to me the lettering looks more like "Smivy"; it might just be my eyes though *blinks a few times*
*shot*
Another quality icon though. You're pretty good at these things. The consistent style makes them easily identifiable as your work.
Although to me the lettering looks more like "Smivy"; it might just be my eyes though *blinks a few times*
I think it is just your eyes 
Lol. Though seriously, I can't make out an 'm', and I'd fix it if I thought I'd have to. I'm not happy with the colouring of the font, though, it's a bit dark for my liking, but I have to keep it that colour because the colour is the same as Snivy's, and less colour = less data used. I have, however, fixed that annoying little pixel on top of his nose and got his legs going 
Just for fun.
NONOTSMUGLEAF.
Lol. Though seriously, I can't make out an 'm', and I'd fix it if I thought I'd have to. I'm not happy with the colouring of the font, though, it's a bit dark for my liking, but I have to keep it that colour because the colour is the same as Snivy's, and less colour = less data used. I have, however, fixed that annoying little pixel on top of his nose and got his legs going Just for fun. NONOTSMUGLEAF.
Oh well, then. I can definately see a twinge of "m" there, but it may be due to it's close proximity to the "i" that makes it look like it has an extra edge. Either way, I know that writing letters like m/n are really difficult with pixels. I mean, I know it's an "n", but then there are moments where it looked a bit m-ified. Lawls. But yeah, maybe it's just the colour. It's a tad hard to see. Even if you had to keep everything the same colour as Snivy couldn't you have shifted the colours a little further to white?
Lolol this is probably sounding really nitpicky now
I just think it's important that little things like logos are actually readable. It's odd how you do a great job with the little Poké-sprites since they're even smaller, yet really easy to make out what they are.
Lolol this is probably sounding really nitpicky now
I just think it's important that little things like logos are actually readable. It's odd how you do a great job with the little Poké-sprites since they're even smaller, yet really easy to make out what they are.If I shifted the colour (and not to white, that'd just make it paler; I'd want it more saturated) then I'd have to do the exact same to Snivy, and I'm very particular about the colours I use on the sprites. And I've got the highest range available chosen from Snivy on the lettering. I wish I could make it lighter, though. Rly!
Oh, good point. I just thought white because it'd be clearer to see against the black. It'd probably have made more sense if I'd just said "brighter". But yeah, since the Snivy's fine I can see why you wouldn't change it. I suppose I'm just being overly critical.
Because,
like,
it still looks like an "m"
*shot*
Because,
like,
it still looks like an "m"
*shot*OuO Lol, you know, I find it hard to believe you would willingly use a trollface. Doesn't seem like you Oh well! I suppose there are more important things to worry about. Like that deviation you've got uploaded 
I'm definitely going to get around to that, don't you worry. It's just slagging critiquing art is kind of tiring, and I need my strength for this week o_o Seriously. I'm not lifting a finger.
Oh well! I suppose there are more important things to worry about. Like that deviation you've got uploaded I'm definitely going to get around to that, don't you worry. It's just Lol well duh, of course you're not lifting a finger; you're lifting many, of which you required to type that previous message.
And obviously the trollface was just a joke.
Or was it?
And obviously the trollface was just a joke.
Or was it?
... *shoots*
View all replies