Comment on Number 12 Part 1 by Squeak-Anon
Personally being the maniacal clever idiot I am, I can see a couple flaws with your theorence (THEORetical sciENCE).
You can come to me if you want to proof-read anything containing DW/HL2/etc sciences. Not one to boast (lies) but I'm pretty damn good when working with theoretical stuffs. I'm one of the people who point out the flaws in the "science" behind sci-fi movies and games. I also know exactly how the universe started, ended, will end, will start, and have invented my own branch of theoretical science.
Apart from a couple things that I think could be improved, it's a pretty good story.
(I am in no way a proper scientist; merely a madman)
(I'm also 13, but don't let it fool you)
You can come to me if you want to proof-read anything containing DW/HL2/etc sciences. Not one to boast (lies) but I'm pretty damn good when working with theoretical stuffs. I'm one of the people who point out the flaws in the "science" behind sci-fi movies and games. I also know exactly how the universe started, ended, will end, will start, and have invented my own branch of theoretical science.
Apart from a couple things that I think could be improved, it's a pretty good story.
(I am in no way a proper scientist; merely a madman)
(I'm also 13, but don't let it fool you)
Sure, go ahead an tell my anything you noticed. I'd like to see the 'madman' in action. 
One more thing: I'm disappointed at the lack of bow tie references.