PixLs-Ink's avatar
"Ugly on purpose"
No one would make something ugly on purpose, unless they are intending on getting bad reviews and critiques.
Zombie-Bionic's avatar
so all art is of fluffy kittens painted in fancy oils? There would be no such thing as art if ugly did not exist. It would also make a lot of cartoons, and tv shows very bland if all of the characters were beautiful. Like if someone did a really detailed drawing of a rotting zombie with all of it's flesh and puss oozing all over the place? Hey, it's not beautiful, but if it was well done I doubt the artist would get a bad review(given the viewer has a stomach of steel).
PixLs-Ink's avatar
I dont find "Fluffy kittens in fancy oils" Beautiful masterpieces.

I find Many things ugly, but a piece with something that I find ugly in it, doesnt mean it's an Ugly peice.
and No where did anyone say anything about "Ugly is not art."
Dont know where you got that from.

If some one did a detailed drawing about Zombies, what makes that ugly? Nothing.

You use the word like it stands for everything unappealing.
Zombie-Bionic's avatar
I'm not, I'm just saying that some things are ugly on purpose but should not be given a poor review unless the art was not done well in whatever medium the artist used. I got the impression from your statement that people who make ugly works of art are only looking for poor reviews because it is intentionally ugly. What I am trying to say is that someone can do ugly on purpose, and they can do it damn well. In the end they can also get a good review.
when I asked "what if it's ugly on purpose" there was absolutely nothing about whether or not the viewer believed a piece is ugly. If a piece is ugly on purpose, and a viewer thinks it's beautiful, that doesn't mean it is beautiful. That also does not mean it will get poor reviews.
PixLs-Ink's avatar
I had a whole thing typed out for this.
But I decided to make it short.

Ugly = Horrible color selection, bad linework, deformed figures, horrible composition.

What YOU think Ugly = Blood and guts, Piss and shit, etc.

If someone is INTENTIONALLY making the former, Then it is a Joke piece. (ie: a poop green and brown background with a bright pink girl in the corner of a page floating at an angle.)

Now if they are doing this because of Inexperience, then some one will correct them.

The Content matter doesnt make something Ugly or not. The execution of the skills he or she possesses.
Zombie-Bionic's avatar
Ok, I am fine with hearing your opinion, but you crossed a line when you told me what I think. First things First. YOU don't know ME. As far as I am concerned, WE HAVE NEVER MET. So unless you're my long lost psychic twin, you don't know and can definitely not tell me what I think.

As for what I THINK: I actually appreciate anyone who has the technical knowledge of the human body to the degree where they can draw it exploding (or whatever else is causing the gore). Also, Urine and fecal matter, are not ugly to me, but they are not beautiful. They are a disgusting technicality that each and every human being must face each and every day to maintain a healthy status.

And in the end all you had to say was "The Content matter doesnt make something Ugly or not. The execution of the skills he or she possesses." because those are my exact sentiments. If a piece is ugly on purpose and is executed well then the artist gets a good review. If they do get a bad review, it is because of inexperience. That is all I was trying to say.

P.S. Ok, I am fine with hearing your opinion, but you crossed a line when you told me what I think. First things First. YOU don't know ME. As far as I am concerned, WE HAVE NEVER MET. My critique is that you get to know the person you are arguing with and don't jump to conclusions. I admit I may have crossed the line myself with the whole "kittens and fancy oils" but that does not mean you had to stoop to whatever level I appear to be on.
PixLs-Ink's avatar
You keep throwing the word ugly in there to keep me commenting.
Because you cant have "ugly on purpose."

You can have Less than pretty things in a piece but it wouldnt be an Ugly on purpose joke piece.

Also, Im fine with you hearing my opinion and not knowing you. But based on how you comment and what you comment about, I respond in a manner of trying to think how you think.
And quite frankly, I dont care to know you, what youre about and your stance on a subject. I will jump to conclusions because I just dont care. You give me what I know about you, and as far as that goes, I make Conclusions.
Zombie-Bionic's avatar
Look, this is going to be my last comment ok? I actually keep using the phrase "ugly on purpose" because that is what we are talking about. I have no intention of really keeping this string of comments going because it is quite clear you don't exactly read what I am writing in my comments. If you did you would have read that I do, in fact, agree with you. That is because we are kindof arguing the same point. Finally if you really did not care, you would have stopped responding before it even came to this last bit. And if you are really jumping to conclusions about me, you are in a sense, trying to get to know me. So if you really did not care, I would suggest you stop replying because if you do, I refuse to respond.

Have a nice day.
View all replies