I'm dissapointed. Shota and lolicon is disgusting, kids having sex with older people/other kids isn't justified just because it's not real. I find it hilarious that most shota fans think it is.
I would rather have shota/loli pronz for pedos to fap to versus them fapping to real life kiddie porn or acting out their fantasies. A drawing is a lot different than the actual thing.
And...this person has said they only like seeing cutesy boys doing cute things, nothing sexual. What are you arguing about again?
Except there's is no conclusive evidence to show that shota/lolli distracts paedophiles from watching child porn, so that argument is out of the window. At least you're trying to be reasonable.
This person seems to think kids taking off each others shirts and sitting in suggestive poses are 'cutesy', this means that she's not quite sure what the word sexual means, calling it cutesy doesn't make it any less sexual. Also this whole stamp is wrong, most shota is child porn, by making this stamp she's supporting the whole genre, if she only likes cute pictures why doesn't she make a stamp that says : Not all shota is child porn?
And, she rags on everyone else for their fetishes, she deserves to be ragged on for once. Because that is hypocrisy, you can't troll people to seem tough and not expect to be trolled.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 2, 2011Student Digital Artist
Hey, maybe learn what shota is before you make some sick assumptions about it.
"It refers to a genre of manga and anime wherein pre-pubescent or pubescent male characters are depicted in a suggestive or erotic manner. It can also apply to postpubescent (adolescent or adult) characters with youthful neotenic features that would make them appear to be younger than they are.
The usage of the term in both Western and Japanese fan cultures includes works ranging from explicitly pornographic to mildly suggestive, romantic or entirely nonsexual."
I hate real life child porn. I hate things involving adult/child relationships. I hate pedophiles. And I hate people who attempt to say anyone into shota is a fucking pedophile. Learn what it is, you ignorant twat, before you come to me saying that it's all wrong. I like ROMANTIC and NON-SEXUAL SHOTA. I don't like sexual things IN GENERAL, adult or child. >_>
I know exactly what shotacon means and what weeaboos are saying when they call a picture they made shota, I don't need schooling in the definition. I have never seen a chibi referred to as shota/shotacon. I have never seen young pokemon or digimon characters referred to as shota (unless someone draws them suggestively, or tries to portray them in a really childlike light that the pedos galore (shota fans) find sexy and normal people find innocent). I would like you to name one popular manga or anime that is referred to by the mangaka as shotacon that isn't romantic, and if you can find one you should be able to find ten. That's like telling me Yaoi isn't about boys fucking each other and we all know that's bullshit. I know what shotacon is, I've been into anime my whole life.
Also, It is downright crude, insolent, stupid and audacious to try and turn the tables on my by accusing me of being the one who's fucked in the head when you're the one who likes shotacon, I don't have any sick 'assumptions'. I would have forgiven your little slip if you hadn't tried to make out I'm the perv because you were caught out. Ask anyone on DA what shotacon means and they'll tell you it's little boys looking sexy (wat), or fucking each other and getting raped (because children can not consent, all shotacon sex is rape).
I don't care. Aw, paedophilia is kawaii and romantic, but only if it's a drawing ^^ No. That's like some guy telling me he only watches Hentai because it's adorable, really, he hates boobs with burning passion. If it's an obsession it doesn't make sense. The only reason I don't think you're a pedo is because you're under 20+, and that's when your brain kind of rewires itself in what it's supposed to be attracted to (not children), if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo. So you're the fucking ignorant twat, I'd love it if you explain to me how children kissing older guys/eachother isn't sexual? Calling it 'romantic' doesn't make it any less sexual. You have some nerve, you need a call out thread.
ALSO Herpafuckingderp ==> [link][link][link] that's what the fuck shota is fucktard, explain to me how finding that cute makes someone a pedophile? well the fuck done
When all those picture are drawn for fuckwits like you to fap over it instantly becomes sexual you fuckwit, not cute, not awww. Tell me if those were real kids in a child porn magazine you'd be okay with it.
I think you're confused and you have issues. You say shota is okay, you get angry when someone doesn't like shota, you don't know what shota is, shota is good. You're also disregarding my examples of why getting kids to tongue/French kiss for pervs like you is sexual because of the theme and audience it's targeting (not kids). Kids kissing isn't sexual unless you make it that way which is what shota fans are good at doing. Hooray.
It is parallel to child exploitation so it stands to reason that I'm going to use examples like that have something to do with child exploitation. If you don't know why, don't bother replying, I can't explain everything to you.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
"you get angry when someone doesn't like shota"
When was I angry?
"You're also disregarding my examples of why getting kids to tongue/French kiss for pervs like you is sexual because of the theme and audience it's targeting (not kids)"
OHEEEEEEEEEYYYY WHAT'D I SAY EARLIER.... HMMMM
"Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one."
Kissing is not sexual. Taking off shirts isn't sexual. 'Suggestive' is mildly sexual, and it's sort of in the middle area I suppose, because there is no explicit sexual actions taking place but it's still an implication. As I have taken note of to clarify for you before, kissing does not count as sexual contact. (And I'm not talking about making out/french kissing etc) -[link] - May pay off to actually read it. :')
"It is parallel to child exploitation so it stands to reason that I'm going to use examples like that have something to do with child exploitation. If you don't know why, don't bother replying, I can't explain everything to you."
Fictional kids are suddenly the same as real sexual abuse.
This whole debate proves you're angry. I didn't start out by labelling you and yet you start calling me a twat and ignorant, teenageinsults-blah-blah-teenageinsults. All true signs of a not-angry person who can argue civilly and coherently, I'm sure.
See? You are stupid. End of debate, I can't argue with ignorant and misplaced arrogance.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
And you call me a weeaboo and a wanker, AND a pedophile. :3
>All true signs of a not-angry person who can argue civilly and coherently, I'm sure.
Yep!!!!!!!! Says you.
"You are stupid. End of debate"
And we go back to the start of what you just posted then realise that you've done exactly the thing you accused me of doing in the same post~~~~~nekonekomiminya
I called you all of those only after you called me a twat, twat. I counter you the only way you know, and that's through verbal abuse. You could've opened this discussion with your point of view civilly to convince me why you don't thing shota is wrong but instead you call me a perv and you call me a twat. You loose my respect by doing that, so expect to loose the privileges that come along with it.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
haha primary school argument
'U STARTED EET I CAN DO IT ALL I LYKKKKK FUK MATURITYYYY ILL BE AS BAD AS YOU!!!!'
tl;dr you failed to be the better person regardless so... :U Lol "You loose my respect by doing that, so expect to loose the privileges that come along with it."
*lose I can also point out every single spelling mistake (and grammar!!!!!!!!!!) you made in almost all of your posts but I'm not a pedant (I totally am 8U). I'm demonstrating how your abuse proves you were angry and why I countered it with abuse to rile you and you spout crap again as if I'm justifying it. Lol. Pay attention to what we're arguing about.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 4, 2011Student Digital Artist
"I can also point out every single spelling mistake (and grammar!!!!!!!!!!"
Okay, I'd like to see that. I've noticed that you can't handle when people aren't being serious so I think I'll be laughing my ass off if it happens to be so that you think WEN I TYP LIK DIS N AL CPSLK N STUF KAWAI DESU NEKO KEYBOOARDDDSSSS I'm genuinely typing like I normally would. Unless you're going to baww because I don't put 'u' in certain words, that works too. Either way this will be entertaining.
"I'm demonstrating how your abuse proves you were angry and why I countered it with abuse to rile you and you spout crap again as if I'm justifying it. Lol. Pay attention to what we're arguing about."
This coming from someone who has demonstrated several times that they were unable to follow the argument. How amusing.
I know you're genuinely typing like you normally would. Leave out some capitalisations, end paragraphs prematurely, abuse punctuation. I don't honestly care though so long as I can follow it, which is hard when you format like a twelve year old.
That's not how you counter argue at all. It would be better if you had said something like: "Assuming I was angry and your attempt to rile me worked." Because now I can safely assume that I was right and I did work you up. You need to be a bit more on the defensive and less on the offensive to balance it out. A 'No u' sort of reply makes you look butthurt and guilty as charged. ;)
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 4, 2011Student Digital Artist
"Leave out some capitalisations, end paragraphs prematurely, abuse punctuation. "
Hmm, find where I've done this in my regular typing then. I sure can't!
"you format like a twelve year old."
Or you attempt to read normal formatting but you have the understanding of a twelve year old, I guess. The insults are funny, though.
"Because now I can safely assume that I was right and I did work you up. "
Nah. There has only been like, one person who actually did kind of irritate me over this whole thing but it wasn't you and it was actually just something over skype. I'm not going to take some people on dA or EDF or whatever the fuck else seriously enough to get upset over it, sorry.
"A 'No u' sort of reply makes you look butthurt and guilty as charged. "
Fist off "explain to me how children kissing older guys/eachother isn't sexual", Ok thats not even what it is
There is a certain style like that but She's not Defending that style
She already told you she doesn't find it sexualy attractive so i think the part your not understanding is the diffrence bettween oh its cute and oh shit lets fap to it
Its not ALL sexual
"if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo" "The only reason I don't think you're a pedo is because you're under 20+" so why are you shouting at her?
And finnaly, ITS A FUCKING DRAWING!!!!!!!! pedophilia hurts people it ruins peoples life's, and to compare all that to a drawing makes you a fucking asshole.
She said down under she found children kissing cute, that means she'd pretending she doesn't like kissing, doesn't like the porn part, but she doesn't know how to lie properly she exposed herself by making this stamp. She also implied that even though it's child porn it's okay because it's not real to someone else. I have no problem with this, except this girl is a hypocrite who calls out all these people on EDF and calls everyone with a weird fetish faggot. Hw is liking children fuck and kiss not weird? It is weird. And if she's part of these weird people she shouldn't call them out as if she's an exception because that means she's will get eventually exposed. I don't go around looking for people with weird fetishes to expose to seem tough, she does. And she doesn't like it when she gets in trouble for it.
Now I do not care about you or your fetishes because you don't go around messing with people who have them. So stop white knighting, it makes you stupid by association.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
"And she doesn't like it when she gets in trouble for it."
Teeheehee but I'm not in trouble, I'm just arguing with a silly person! You're very bad at making me look bad. But talking about me is so adorbsssss, I'm giggling.
"Hw is liking children fuck and kiss not weird? It is weird." x2forever
The only person who has mentioned kids fucking is you. x3
"She said down under she found children kissing cute, that means she'd pretending she doesn't like kissing, doesn't like the porn part, but she doesn't know how to lie properly she exposed herself by making this stamp. "
Yes I do find fictional boys of any age between 10 and 20 cute! I'm not going to lie about that. The sex isn't to my taste, though.
This is what you sound like: "Bawhaw, I'm going to move to tumblr becuz every1 fink im pedo and i am but im not but YOURE THE BUTTHURT ONE *sniff*" ^ the sound of a butthurt non-troll if you ask me.
Nope, lol. Most Shota = kids fucking, I didn't make that up. And yes it has, it's exposed your hypocrisy. Have a good day.
>>. You think I didn't read the comments xD? You're a hopeless wriggler, you were bawwwing to someone about how everyone thinks you're a pedo and DA sucks and eventually they turned against you because you think it's cool to be edgy.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 2, 2011Student Digital Artist
Ughhhh so much butthurt to go throoouuughhhh
>I know exactly what shotacon means and what weeaboos are saying when they call a picture they made shota
So, I'm a weeaboo because I like shota, huh? Newsflash! I fucking hate weeaboos, I hate the Japanese language, I hate Japanese food/life/everything, basically. I don't give a shit about Japan at all, I just know the terms for these things and I don't know an english term for it (I'm not gonna go around like YEAH I SAW THIS CUTE KIDDIE PORN OF TWO 12 Y/O BOYS KISSING LOLOLOL!!! because that would seriously be implying it's pornographic sexual content, which I'm not into anyway)
"I would like you to name one popular manga or anime that is referred to by the mangaka as shotacon "
1, I barely read manga or watch anime anymore. That was like when I was 13? Also, adding 'popular' in seems a bit stupid. So something has to be popular before you give a fuck about the fact that not all shota is pornographic? How conceited. <3
"That's like telling me Yaoi isn't about boys fucking each other and we all know that's bullshit."
That's like saying that shipping in general - yaoi, yuri, hetero, is all about sex. It isn't. I've read 'fluff' yaoi and seen it, I've seen and read the same for shota and hetero, everything else. Not everyone wants to make shit fuck each other all the time. :u I'm guessing the only yaoi you've ever found (probably searching for it, haha) is ridiculously 'porn without plot' kind, which is only popular with horny fucktards.
"me of being the one who's fucked in the head when you're the one who likes shotacon, "
Being unable to accept someone who likes shotacon, nonsexually, and only in non-suggestive pieces shows an inability to handle it. A fear, perhaps, that someone likes something you have been raised to hate for your stupid reasons such as LOL ITS ALL SEX LOL CHILD PORN, when it isn't. Clearly you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, because I sure do and I actually took my time to look up whether it is supporting pedophilia etc and I found that it wasn't. There is nothing wrong with liking child characters doing fluffy things.
"I would have forgiven your little slip if you hadn't tried to make out I'm the perv because you were caught out."
Caught out? What the fuck are you talking about? And I didn't try to make out you're the perv but now you're trying to ram in all of this 'shota and yaoi is always sex!!!' thing, I am really starting to think you are quite perverted and fucked in the head for thinking that way. :3 I sure don't.
"Ask anyone on DA" dA - Now an accurate demographic of people with a brain. What fucking irony!
"I don't care. Aw, paedophilia is kawaii and romantic, but only if it's a drawing ^^"
Dude, real child porn is disgusting. I don't see the problem with liking absolutely harmless fictional content at all. :/ (Also, Kawaii is the most fucking stupid word to use, you fucking weeaboo.)
"That's like some guy telling me he only watches Hentai because it's adorable, really, he hates boobs with burning passion."
Hentai - "A work of anime or manga (or any similar medium) that contains sexual or pornographic art"
Hentai is made to be pornographic. It is a genre of porn. Shotacon CAN be a genre of porn, as can lolicon, but it is not ALWAYS. I don't see what's so hard about understanding that there are people who exist who do not like the sexual kinds of shota and loli etc, while there are some that do.
Basically, if you were to compare the whole range of shota to something while claiming it is all as bad as hentai, you might as well say 'EVERYONE INTO ANIME IS A FUCKING PERVERT!!!' Because, ho snap, not all anime is sexual, right? Not all shota is sexual! Hentai is sexual while SOME shota is sexual! If you're smart enough to realise what I'm trying to say by now I guess you should pat yourself on the back or something.
"if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo."
Fapping? When the hell did I ever say I got off to this shit? As I said in the journal that is linked in the description - I do not like sexual shota, and I am not sexually attracted to shota in general. I just think that shota - which for me is basically like 10/11/12/13 year olds doing things that can be seen is yaoi (I'll reiterate as you may be too stupid to have forgotten not all yaoi is sexual) - is pretty cute? I mean really, I find non-sexual yaoi, and yuri, and hetero stuff cute as well. I just like relationships I guess?
"So you're the fucking ignorant twat, I'd love it if you explain to me how children kissing older guys/eachother isn't sexual?"
I said before, I hate adult/child relationships. That is an adult exploiting a minor and I'm not even going near that shit because I just don't like it. Adults can be with adults, kids can be with kids. Not mixing them up in that way. :/
No, I'm not the ignorant one because I know what I'm talking about. You make poor assumptions and also act like everything must be pornographic because some of it is, which it isn't.
Kissing isn't sexual, lol. If a kid kisses another kid, it's not sexual.
"(2) "Sexual contact" means any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person done for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire of either party or a third party."
So basically, as long as genitalia isn't involved, or otherwise erogenic places... It's not sexual. :/ A cute hug or a kiss or just playing together isn't sexual. If they started having sex in any way (including oral) yes, that would be sexual shota. Please get your facts straight and make sure you are not making false assumptions before you try to argue, as it DOES make you look incredibly ignorant.
"You have some nerve, you need a call out thread."
ha ha oh man fucking bite me, I don't care if I get a 'call out thread', go make one if you're that butthurt over it! x3
Lol, butthurt? You're the one who made this butthurt stamp because you can't handle being seen like the weeaboo, hypocrite you are, not me. Aaaaaaand, nope. You're still a weeaboo. Pretending you're not because you hate Japan? Lol. It doesn't work that way.
Being unable to accept someone who likes shotacon, nonsexually, and only in non-suggestive pieces shows an inability to handle it. A fear, perhaps, that someone likes something you have been raised to hate for your stupid reasons such as LOL ITS ALL SEX LOL CHILD PORN, when it isn't. Clearly you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, because I sure do and I actually took my time to look up whether it is supporting pedophilia etc and I found that it wasn't. There is nothing wrong with liking child characters doing fluffy things.
Non sexually is the key word. From your contradicting argument I gather that you like it sexually but are too wuss to admit it. Why the fuck should I accept it? Give me one reason why I should be okay with pictures of kids fucking/getting fucked? Open mindness? Don't try to analyze me because I'm not okay with comic version of pedophilia being all over DA, you're a dumb little girl who has no idea what she's talking about. Drop it. And, you took your time to look it up? Clearly an indicator that you didn't fully know what it was beforehand. Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one.
Caught out? What the fuck are you talking about? And I didn't try to make out you're the perv but now you're trying to ram in all of this 'shota and yaoi is always sex!!!' thing, I am really starting to think you are quite perverted and fucked in the head for thinking that way. :3 I sure don't.
Okay, retard. Name me one popular Yaoi/shotacon that isn't sexual. I just need one, because everyone (but you) seems to know if it's clean it's Shonen ai, otherwise it's Yaoi. And yes, you are a perv, and you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently. You keep calling me a perv like it's insulting, I don't really care for the word but I don't find it offensive in the least. Problem is, it's not my perversion that we're discussing it's yours.
Hentai is made to be pornographic. It is a genre of porn. Shotacon CAN be a genre of porn, as can lolicon, but it is not ALWAYS. I don't see what's so hard about understanding that there are people who exist who do not like the sexual kinds of shota and loli etc, while there are some that do.
Basically, if you were to compare the whole range of shota to something while claiming it is all as bad as hentai, you might as well say 'EVERYONE INTO ANIME IS A FUCKING PERVERT!!!' Because, ho snap, not all anime is sexual, right? Not all shota is sexual! Hentai is sexual while SOME shota is sexual! If you're smart enough to realise what I'm trying to say by now I guess you should pat yourself on the back or something.
Yaoi is also gay-guy porn, I'm not debating what is porn and what is not, that's what you're doing. I actually do understand that some shota fans don't read the pornographic manga (some, you're obviously not one of them), which is why I don't think everyone who watches/reads shota is a pedo, however you're defending the whole genre while pretending you don't really like it. You also seem to find other people, furries, car fetishists, and such perverts and nasties. This makes you a hypocrite, because how is sexualizing children any less weird? If you weren't such a hypocrite your fetishes would be okay to me, I wouldn't care. But since you care about everyone else's, how does it feel to have a better version of your own badly made medicine?
Fapping is an expression, meaning you get some sort of pleasure from viewing it, I didn't mean it literally. But since you're taking it so seriously, I'd say this is a true sign of guilt.
I said before, I hate adult/child relationships. That is an adult exploiting a minor and I'm not even going near that shit because I just don't like it. Adults can be with adults, kids can be with kids. Not mixing them up in that way. :/
No, I'm not the ignorant one because I know what I'm talking about. You make poor assumptions and also act like everything must be pornographic because some of it is, which it isn't.
Kissing isn't sexual, lol. If a kid kisses another kid, it's not sexual.
A lot of shota has relationships between minors and older people, so no, apparently you don't know what you're talking about. And kids kissing kids aimed at an audience of older women and men is sexual because the audience would be fapping to it. If there was a magazine about kids kissing and doing 'suggestive'- not entirely sexual things to each other, it would be considered sexual exploitation of children because of the audience. So don't try to act coy and think before you speak.
So basically, as long as genitalia isn't involved, or otherwise erogenic places... It's not sexual. :/ A cute hug or a kiss or just playing together isn't sexual. If they started having sex in any way (including oral) yes, that would be sexual shota. Please get your facts straight and make sure you are not making false assumptions before you try to argue, as it DOES make you look incredibly ignorant.
No, it's still sexual because it's in the shota genre. If pedophiles find kids playing sexual and we go make a magazine for pedos with kids playing in it, how is it not sexual exploitation? Now you look ignorant. The only thing that positive about it is it's not real, having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone. Because the real community is replaced with a bunch of people who fap to animals having sex, kids having sex/kissing, cars having sex, MLP's having sex, Hello Kitty having sex...you catch my drift.
You will be getting a call out soon, so try to keep some of your butthurt for then. <3
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
Hehehe.
"Lol, butthurt? You're the one who made this butthurt stamp because you can't handle being seen like the weeaboo, hypocrite you are, not me. "
Ooh, let's look at what a weeaboo is! [link] (Because this kind of slang isn't going to be in a proper dictionary, hahaha)
"Weeaboo (a.k.a Wapanese) is an English slang used to describe a person (typically of non-Asian descent) who prefers Japan and all things in Japanese over one’s indigenous culture. The term is a successive mutation of “Wapanese,” a derogatory slur referring to western Japanophiles with a strong bias towards Japanese cultural and tech imports."
Hmm, oh, wait - Didn't I just say that I don't like Japanese things? Wow, I must be a weeaboo even though I don't like japanese things all that much! Never knew it!
"Pretending you're not because you hate Japan? Lol. It doesn't work that way. "
A weeaboo would become extremely offended with anyone who hates their precious pockyland. I don't give a fuck about it. Hm, must be a weeaboo even though I don't really care that much about Japanese things....
Also, from the above article. " Wapanese: a slur used to describe a white person who is obssesed with japanese culture. This would include manga/hentai/and anime.
- The Racial Slur Database, 2002"
I'm not /obsessed/ with shota. I like it and if I come across it I d'aww and move on. So really, I don't see how you could make an argument out of that within this context. xD
But I must be a weeabooooooooo desu desu kawaii nyan sasuke is my husbando and I married my pillow sparkle pinku sailor meow vocaloid luka and named it spongebobu. (Haha you're so silly I bet you'll think that was serious!)
"Non sexually is the key word. From your contradicting argument I gather that you like it sexually but are too wuss to admit it."
That is pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. No, I do not like it 'sexually', at all. I don't get sexually aroused by underdeveloped little children. :/ I prefer... oh, jeez, real people? Like, wow, never would have thought that real people of my own age would be my main attraction right now. Pedophiles are sexually attracted to children, fictional/non-fictional. I am not sexually attracted to real children or fictional children.
"Why the fuck should I accept it? Give me one reason why I should be okay with pictures of kids fucking/getting fucked? Open mindness? Don't try to analyze me because I'm not okay with comic version of pedophilia being all over DA, you're a dumb little girl who has no idea what she's talking about."
Excuse me, but I'm not okay with pictures of kids in sexual actions either, believe it or not. Children exploited sexually or drawn for that purpose so sick fucks who DO like sexual loli/shota is just not my thing at all. In real life, when it is damaging a real child's life, it's fucking disgusting and I would hurt the people doing it if I could. Shota (and I guess I should argue for loli even though I'm not into that because it's basically the same but with girls) is not always sexual. If you saw 'the comic version of pedophilia' on dA, it would be something involving sexual contact which is against the TOS anyway, so I don't know where you're getting this shit from unless you actively search for it. I haven't seen explicitly sexual shotacon on here (but I don't go around looking for it so yeah mileage may vary.)
I may be younger than you but I do know what I'm talking about. Your readiness to make insults in the stead of actual arguments moreso with each message (refer to the above comments about how I am a 'weeaboo' and a 'hypocrite') proves to me that you are incapable of arguing properly. It's like arguing with a child and all they can come up with is 'BUT YOU'RE STUPID!!!!' rather than a rational argument. I even went through the trouble of looking things up to correct you when you acted like your opinion were based on fact - in some cases, yeah, it's okay to say that SOME things are sexual, but some aren't. Then again, it's not exactly just to compare something entirely sexual (refer to comment about 'hentai' in the above post you made) to something which is not always sexual. People have different tastes in things, and you can't lump all people into one group. At least I have a willingness to check my arguments are correct without spewing insults to make up for arguments (I mean, come on, when I insult you at least I have an argument to go with it. So perhaps you're the dumb girl who has no idea what she's talking about (my little insult here), while I can back that with the above arguments and everything thereafter. :3
"And, you took your time to look it up? Clearly an indicator that you didn't fully know what it was beforehand."
Half correct. I have ideas of what things are based upon what I have seen and heard from people, but I looked up things up for your benefit so that I could show you why you are wrong in your assumptions. Besides that, it's an indicator that I am willing to clarify my arguments with solid evidence... Which you seem to be lacking in! <3
"Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one."
Kissing is not sexual. Taking off shirts isn't sexual. 'Suggestive' is mildly sexual, and it's sort of in the middle area I suppose, because there is no explicit sexual actions taking place but it's still an implication. As I have taken note of to clarify for you before, kissing does not count as sexual contact. (And I'm not talking about making out/french kissing etc)
"Okay, retard. Name me one popular Yaoi/shotacon that isn't sexual. I just need one, because everyone (but you) seems to know if it's clean it's Shonen ai, otherwise it's Yaoi. And yes, you are a perv, and you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently. You keep calling me a perv like it's insulting, I don't really care for the word but I don't find it offensive in the least. Problem is, it's not my perversion that we're discussing it's yours."
I don't read whole mangas about it or 'popular' ones at that. The most I go with manga now is like, horror stuff. :/ Also, again - so if it's not popular, it doesn't count? Just because I don't care about specific yaoi/shota manga/anime/whatever it is people read or whatever about it doesn't mean I've never seen it at all. Also, 'Shonen Ai' is not shota. It's basically the term for specifically non-sexual yaoi, whereas in yaoi there are non sexual aspects. (it's not all about the gay sex lol)
I don't see how I'm a perv when hardly anything actually turns me on at all? :/ I mean, not shota or a lot of things. I can only name like 2 things that would turn me on and one of them is real life people of my own age, not cartoons. The other is just a kink of mine which I'm not overly obsessed with anyway. Perversion would be mostly (loosely) pertaining to sexual tendencies out of the norm; I'm 15, and I don't really care about sex that much yet. How am I a pervert? (Protip: I'm not.)
"Yaoi is also gay-guy porn, I'm not debating what is porn and what is not, that's what you're doing."
Yet you're the one who is basically trying to state all shota is sexual and made for the purposes of what is essentially porn, when it isn't. Most of your arguments are 'PPL FAP TO IT ITS SEXUAL' and, oh, wait, 'I'm not debating what is porn and what is not'? Really? No, you are. You're trying to tell me that EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF SHOTA EVER IS SEXUAL when I have informed you several times that it is not, and this is not the case.
you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently!
"I actually do understand that some shota fans don't read the pornographic manga (some, you're obviously not one of them), which is why I don't think everyone who watches/reads shota is a pedo, however you're defending the whole genre while pretending you don't really like it. You also seem to find other people, furries, car fetishists, and such perverts and nasties."
"(some, you're obviously not one of them)"
See, you keep making these arguments like I'm not this, I'm not that, I don't know things etc when I do. Just because you can't accept my arguments doesn't mean that I am wrong. I find pedophiles nasty. I find SEXUAL shotacon nasty. (Thus how am I defending all of it? ) I don't see how you can't understand that I do not like the sexual side of it, as much as you're trying to say I am when I'm admitting that I'm not. I have informed you also that not all shota is sexual, and I keep reiterating it to you over and over but you refuse to understand that. And you seem to be dead set on thinking that I am some kind of person attracted to this sexually when my journal, this stamp, and all of my messages concerning this have been pointing out that I'm not. Deary me, it's like other people can like the non sexual side, but I can't! Haha, what bullshit.
</i>"This makes you a hypocrite, because how is sexualizing children any less weird?" </i>
It isn't. :U Not sure what you're trying to get at here considering the points I've made.
</i>"If you weren't such a hypocrite your fetishes would be okay to me, I wouldn't care. But since you care about everyone else's, how does it feel to have a better version of your own badly made medicine?"</i>
What medicine? You're not really doing anything that would befit that saying, haha.
You don't know my fetishes. :3 None of them. (A fetish being an obsession or otherwise 'sexual fetish' and to me, shota is neither. I am not obsessed with it, and I am not sexually aroused by it, so I can hardly consider it a fetish. It's just a 'like'.)
Soooo yeah not sure what you're on about here. Just seems like you're trying to act all smart and right again when you're actually being very silly. (Assuming it's my fetish, as an example! :'D )
"Fapping is an expression, meaning you get some sort of pleasure from viewing it, I didn't mean it literally. But since you're taking it so seriously, I'd say this is a true sign of guilt. "
Oh noooo better go look that up again! Here, why don't you see for yourself?. Fapping is a slang term for masturbation, and yes, I agree that that would crudely describe getting pleasure from something. However, that would be sexual pleasure. :/
you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently! x2, now!
"And kids kissing kids aimed at an audience of older women and men is sexual because the audience would be fapping to it. If there was a magazine about kids kissing and doing 'suggestive'- not entirely sexual things to each other, it would be considered sexual exploitation of children because of the audience. So don't try to act coy and think before you speak."
I see no backing for this. At all. No facts? No quotes? No evidence? How utterly poor. Trying to pass your own opinion off as a fact with nothing to back up your claims is a good sign of someone who isn't bothering to make their argument persuasive.
Let's have some actual quotes up in here, if few because I can't be fucked to go find a whole quotebook on this subject.
"The earliest Boys' Love Genre manga of the early 1970s featured love affairs between early-teen boys, but were marketed to (female) readers of the same age. "
"Shotacon attracts mostly pedophiles, and young yaoi fangirls. "
I'm sure they speak for themselves, yes? I'm kind of hoping I don't have to theoretically hold your hand and walk you through all of this, because that would be a shame. :c
"No, it's still sexual because it's in the shota genre."
Refer to my above post where I pointed out that the shota genre has things ranging from non sexual to explicitly sexual. If it's not intended to be sexual then it is more the audience's preferences than the actual intention of the work.
(So, "If pedophiles find kids playing sexual and we go make a magazine for pedos with kids playing in it, how is it not sexual exploitation" is kind of a confusing argument. Because 1, if you made a magazine of what I assume is fictional work of kids playing together (I'm not really thinking about real children with this, though I don't think it would be very immoral if it was real children) then it is not intended to be pornographic (unless you suddenly turn round and make a conceited little argument about how it TTLY WUZ SEXUAL, U WEEABOO U DUN GET IT and I'll just laugh at that for how incredibly silly it is) but secondly, you say it's made for pedophiles, therefore it would have to be to their tastes and thus arouse their attraction to children as it's the audience.
So you're basically pointed out that if someone makes work with the intention of arousing pedophiles it is sexual exploitation, I agree with that, and I can't really be all 'no it isn't' because exploiting children for the sexual arousement of adults is exploitation of minors. :U
However, say that then the same magazine was made for people who are not pedophiles (like, just the general public) it would not be sexual exploitation because it is not intentionally aimed at pedophiles or otherwise only made for the purpose of giving people their sexual kicks.
Then the 'fault' falls upon the audience who are gaining their sexual attraction from something that is not intended to have such an effect, so you can't blame whoever made the magazine if some people take it very differently to others.
"Now you look ignorant. "
haha, back to the petty insults, I see.
"The only thing that positive about it is it's not real, having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone. "
No idea what you're talking about. So if shotacon 'gets the fuck out of deviantart' because 'most of the users flocking here' would 'like that sort of thing' the whole point of the website would be gone? I only understand half of that, but not how shota being absent from deviantart would make it worse.
"Because the real community is replaced with a bunch of people who fap to animals having sex, kids having sex/kissing, cars having sex, MLP's having sex, Hello Kitty having sex...you catch my drift. "
'Having sex/kissing'
Oh wow this is fucking gold haha so wait if someone takes a picture of themselves kissing someone (even just a friend?) it's suddenly relevant to sex and can thus be placed in what is essentially an argument about how the community of this site is full of people who sexualize everything... Just because they kiss?
Also lol'd because you put that in where all the others only say 'sex' as if it's going to change something.
"You will be getting a call out soon, so try to keep some of your butthurt for then. <3"
OHHH NOOOOO!!!!! SO SCARED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;3;3;3;3;33;3;3;3;;33;3; -crawls into pocky box nyan desu vocaloid chan boxu~ - but wat will happen to my sexual shirtless child pawn then??????!!!!! U BAKA
mkay well I think that's all of it replied to but if i missed some of it or fucked up some tags oh well oops i don't care if i did
So er, from your wall of text I gather that you're unable to back yourself so you're spamming me with dictionary. Give up, you admitted to being a paedophile elsewhere so everything here is irrelevant.
Also, for your information, kids kissing each other and taking each others shirts off for wankers like you to watch is sexual, don't try to convince me by highlighting parts of definition and twisting it to suit your argument. And learn2comprehension, grammar, and formatting. Your wall was painfully hard to read because of your lack of all the very common English skills and your deliberate misunderstanding of what I'm saying. I said fuckers like you need to get off deviant art because you'll bring more shota fans here and obviously that's a bad thing, if you don't see why then I rest my case, you are an idiot. You started the 'petty insults', so grow some balls and accept it back. I was going to call you out on EDF but someone's got you nicely covered. Have a good day.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
"I gather that you're unable to back yourself so you're spamming me with dictionary."
THE DICTIONARY QUOTES ARE TO BACK UP MY POINTS. (Though that sure does seem a foreign concept to you, haha!)
"Also, for your information, kids kissing each other and taking each others shirts off for wankers like you to watch is sexual, don't try to convince me by highlighting parts of definition and twisting it to suit your argument."
Also, taking shirts of is sexual how? Kissing is sexual HOW? Is a kiss on the cheek = FUCKING PORNOGRAPHY now?
"And learn2comprehension, grammar, and formatting."
I fucked up two tags. BIG DEAL HURR
Actually, my grammar and comprehension is fine. You just can't be bothered to read it because as I have confirmed you are lazy and terrible at arguing. I find it ironic this is coming from miss "having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone"
That is fucking sheer engrish.
"I said fuckers like you need to get off deviant art because you'll bring more shota fans here and obviously that's a bad thing, if you don't see why then I rest my case, you are an idiot."
Sorry I don't speak idiot, dear, perhaps you should speak english like you did the second time round to begin with. :3
"deliberate misunderstanding of what I'm saying"
ha ha ha no you obviously didn't bother to read where I even AGREED with you.
"You started the 'petty insults', so grow some balls and accept it back."
Not reading the arguments agaaaaiiin~ Oh silly girl~
"I was going to call you out on EDF but someone's got you nicely covered. Have a good day."
I read everything you said, none of it made sense. All of it was definitions and rambling of points you're not sure you're making and terrible formatting. You can't make up your mind whether bold is for emphasis or quoting sources or quoting me, and then you throw italics in the mix. I can't be expected to keep re-reading it for it to make sense, it's your duty to convey your argument properly not mine.
Also: "having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone."
You want me to explain? Okay:
having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing Shota should get out out of DA because it's attracting a disturbing audience of fetishists, weird young females and paedophiles. and the whole point of this website is gone. once that happens, the site will become a cesspit of porn and fetish pieces and the reason it was made (a community for artists, not pervs) will have vanished. I should have probably used 'will have' instead of 'is' though.
Nice, attempting to be condescending. Not working, you lost this argument the moment you made this stamp. And yes they do have it covered, try to enjoy it while you can.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 3, 2011Student Digital Artist
"I read everything you said, none of it made sense. All of it was definitions and rambling of points you're not sure you're making and terrible formatting. You can't make up your mind whether bold is for emphasis or quoting sources or quoting me, and then you throw italics in the mix. "
It's quite clear that emphasis is quoting you or emphasising (WOW) while bold also serves this purpose to emphasise points of both. See it's too hard to understand for you... :'D
"I can't be expected to keep re-reading it for it to make sense, it's your duty to convey your argument properly not mine."
It's your duty to stop being a lazy fuckface and read before you keep trying.
"once that happens, the site will become a cesspit of porn and fetish pieces and the reason it was made (a community for artists, not pervs) will have vanished. I should have probably used 'will have' instead of 'is' though."
>Implying it's in the future
"Not working, you lost this argument the moment you made this stamp."
Nope. :') So adorable.
"And yes they do have it covered, try to enjoy it while you can."
hahahahahaha and where is the proof of this i want to see this now if it's more than just the pedophilia thread
You can't use bold for both emphasis and quoting then decide to use italics sporadically halfway. Learn to format.
I don't have a duty to do anything actually, I'm not obliged to reply and neither do I want to any more since your brain seems to be deteriorating by the second.
It is in the future, thankfully. Right now furries are on the rise.
You're in denial. It doesn't affect me. Have a good day.
No you can't, you have to keep it consistent or else it becomes incomprehensible and it makes your post look schizophrenic.
The same applies to you, you are not adding anything to this discussion except shit like : ASGHSAHFNKSGKRGTNFDA omg im so blah-blah. You're spamming my inbox with maniac rambling, I' not interested any more, stop looking for every post I made to reply to, it makes you look desperate.
Stuck in the past. Lol. You can't even counter argue, you started this, you handle it properly. Did you expect everyone to tiptoe on eggshells because loads of people like shota? Yes, it seems like you did. You couldn't even use rhetoric to convince me, you declare war from your first reply and somehow you expect tolerance.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 4, 2011Student Digital Artist
Oh, holy shit. My posts have a fucking disorder. Did you become a doctor and diagnose them? I should go print them out and send them off for meds and therapy!
"I' not interested any more"
Lol I'
Then what' making you keep on replying to me, then? I mean, really, it' not like I' making you do it.
"stop looking for every post I made to reply to, it makes you look desperate."
Stop going through my comments and replying to people and maybe I'll look more desperate than you. :')
>Stuck in the past. Lol.
Furries are pretty much settled here, man. It's not the most 'rising' thing.
"Did you expect everyone to tiptoe on eggshells because loads of people like shota? Yes, it seems like you did."
And it seems that you think you can pass your opinions off as facts. No, I didn't think that. Why do you think I made this stamp and put it here? :') I wasn't expecting anyone to agree with me.
"You couldn't even use rhetoric to convince me, you declare war from your first reply and somehow you expect tolerance."
If that was supposed to be ironic or funny it failed.
*I'm. And I stopped the moment you hinted it was bothering your friend. I actually have no beef with her, so I probably could've left her alone. You on the other hand keep going on and on and on and on using ad hominem and making ridiculous impersonations of I'm not sure what and yourself while making sure you contribute next to nothing to this non-debate.
I didn't pass of any of my facts as opinions. All of my 'opinions' were facts. Which is: Most shota is sexual in nature. (Which you're arguing against even though you're 'apparently' not interested in sexual shota.) You have yet to provide me with a single ounce of evidence (other than definitions) that this isn't true. Show me one manga that is shotacon, that is innocent and non-sexual, just one. I'll leave you alone. It shouldn't be hard to fin even if you don't even read manga. In fact, if shotacon is mostly innocent as you claim all you have to do is look it up and you'd find loads. I can't find any, maybe you can help me?
I'm arrogant is why I'm still talking to you, it will be my downfall. I like being right especially when I am. Even though I probably shouldn't feed your butthurt, my carnal reaction is to respond.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 4, 2011Student Digital Artist
Just like you've failed to see how funny you are.
"And I stopped the moment you hinted it was bothering your friend. I actually have no beef with her, so I probably could've left her alone"
Him. :'D
"You on the other hand keep going on and on and on and on using ad hominem and making ridiculous impersonations of I'm not sure what and yourself while making sure you contribute next to nothing to this non-debate. "
Fuck, learn to use commas and I'll read the bullshit you spew a bit more.
"All of my 'opinions' were facts."
Opinions are not facts. :'D Oh wow, even I know that.
Also, I'm not interested in sexual shota so why would I know if it's sexual, when I focus on the non-sexual stuff? I mean jesus fuck didn't that ever become apparent that I might just not go look for the sexual stuff. I mean what am I meant to do, make a tally of how many sexual or non sexual pictures I found to say 'yep there's more of this' or whatever?
"Show me one manga that is shotacon, that is innocent and non-sexual, just one. I'll leave you alone. It shouldn't be hard to fin even if you don't even read manga."
Really? From what I've seen, this is how you react when faced with shota images that aren't sexual, so I don't see why I should when you're going to be so immature about it. 'It is sexual because it's made for people to fap to!' Uhm... No? That's just some kids hugging and some neko or whatever playing with another one's ears. I doubt they were made to be 'omg hot' or whatever.
Go find it yourself, is all I can say, because you won't even listen to someone who did some searches and found those pictures when he doesn't like shota in the first place. Yet, y'know, everyone who argues with you is a 'fuckwit' and apparently into shota.
It's funny because you act like I'm the one getting all mad and insulting people but then you call two other people names (imbecile and fuckwit, iirc) right off the bat and one of them wasn't even talking to you (but you went and did the 'desperate' thing and had to go through old comments anyway to make more replies, derp.)
"I can't find any, maybe you can help me?"
Considering you are unable to even use google without my help, I'm just gonna stick with the fact you can't. :') Though, really, I'm just gonna point out when faced with non-sexual images you try to make out they are, when I have already had this discussion about how when something is not intended to be sexual (such as those images) then it is the fault of the audience for finding it as such. A bit like you do. :)
"I'm arrogant is why I'm still talking to you, it will be my downfall. I like being right especially when I am."
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 5, 2011Student Digital Artist
It's not irrelevant, just pointing something out to you. (I figured 'maleficprince' was a pretty obvious male name to take, anyway.)
"You tried to elegantly save him and failed. And according to him I'm a fucktard and a fucking asshole, he said it off the bat not I."
"ALSO Herpafuckingderp ==> [link] [link] [link] that's what the fuck shota is fucktard, explain to me how finding that cute makes someone a pedophile? well the fuck done "
Where does it say 'fucking asshole'? I don't see it! :3 Making up insults.
"I explained to you already why it's sexual. You didn't explain to me why it isn't. You just say it's cute and fluffy. A very convincing argument indeed. "
You explained nothing, I did.
"Also, see? You lose this debate the moment you refuse to provide evidence. The weight of evidence resides on your shoulders not mine, I am not going to provide you with your evidence. I can provide proof for my position however: [link] I just typed in shota and look what I got."
The best part is, I can just look at that and there's an equal balance between the sexual pictures and non-sexual. :') So you basically just proved my point.
"You talk about me being rude and offensive yet I toned down just for you so that maybe you could maybe focus on the debate instead of trying seem edgy and right. Nope, still unable to use reason. Ironic."
You explained nothing. All you did was provide dictionary definitions and your own opinion which is: "it's cute and fluffy therefore it's not sexual, and real child porn has nothing to do with this :333333".
Except it's all picture of kids either getting fucked or waiting to get fucked, there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to. You still haven't provided evidence, you've admitted your defeat by this.
Adora-bloodthirstyFeatured By OwnerOct 5, 2011Student Digital Artist
That's not the comment in question, now, is it? Hehe. Irrelevant.
"You explained nothing. All you did was provide dictionary definitions"
Suddenly, definitions don't explain anything! Jeez, they must be so useless, then. Or maybe you don't know what a definition is.
"it's cute and fluffy therefore it's not sexual, and real child porn has nothing to do with this :333333"
... Which is true. Real childporn is REAL children being exploited. Fictional work is not real children, sexual or not. When something is 'fluffy' it is not sexual at all, usually not even romantic or anything of the sort. So I don't see your point here.
"Except it's all picture of kids either getting fucked or waiting to get fucked, there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to."
I counted images that I found explicitly sexual, suggestive and non sexual. :3 18 'Non sexual' (No genitalia depicted, fully clothed) 5 'Suggestive' (Half clothed, in suggestive poses, etc) 8 'Sexual' (Containing clear depictions of sexual contact or genitalia)
I would show an image marking out this but I know better than to link to explicit images, unlike you have. (Which I suppose is worth reporting, considering you did link to a page showing explicit sex. :/ )
"there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to."
I saw the same things you did, actually. You're picking out the porn, and seeing what you want to, really.
you have yet to prove that you won. :/
"I am right. Lol. You're just in denial."
Like you're in denial that non-sexual shota exists? Heeeeeeee how funny.
Hehe. Irrelevant? So, you say I made up an insult and when I show where he said it you say 'irrelevant'? I see what this is. You and your friend haven't heard the word fuckwit before and it offends you. He attempted to white knight for you and it went wrong, call the waambulance. Maybe if you get the party sized dildo out of your ass and jerk each other off in consolation you'd feel better.
There were 27 pictures of kids with dicks getting fucked or jerking each other off, all the manga that was displayed was that of kids having sex. The rest were either sexually suggestive (majority) and an extreme minority of them were just anime young boys referred to by fans as shota. You can't do maths either it would seem.
I'm concluding this discussion, I can't be bothered to even bother you any more. It's no longer fulfilling when you make it so obvious that you're extremely butthurt with your 'TEHEEEHEHEHEHE'. For a self proclaimed troll, you really are a failure.
Oh well, you're only 15.
Devious Comments
And...this person has said they only like seeing cutesy boys doing cute things, nothing sexual. What are you arguing about again?
This person seems to think kids taking off each others shirts and sitting in suggestive poses are 'cutesy', this means that she's not quite sure what the word sexual means, calling it cutesy doesn't make it any less sexual. Also this whole stamp is wrong, most shota is child porn, by making this stamp she's supporting the whole genre, if she only likes cute pictures why doesn't she make a stamp that says : Not all shota is child porn?
And, she rags on everyone else for their fetishes, she deserves to be ragged on for once. Because that is hypocrisy, you can't troll people to seem tough and not expect to be trolled.
"It refers to a genre of manga and anime wherein pre-pubescent or pubescent male characters are depicted in a suggestive or erotic manner. It can also apply to postpubescent (adolescent or adult) characters with youthful neotenic features that would make them appear to be younger than they are.
The usage of the term in both Western and Japanese fan cultures includes works ranging from explicitly pornographic to mildly suggestive, romantic or entirely nonsexual."
I hate real life child porn.
I hate things involving adult/child relationships.
I hate pedophiles.
And I hate people who attempt to say anyone into shota is a fucking pedophile. Learn what it is, you ignorant twat, before you come to me saying that it's all wrong. I like ROMANTIC and NON-SEXUAL SHOTA. I don't like sexual things IN GENERAL, adult or child. >_>
Also, It is downright crude, insolent, stupid and audacious to try and turn the tables on my by accusing me of being the one who's fucked in the head when you're the one who likes shotacon, I don't have any sick 'assumptions'. I would have forgiven your little slip if you hadn't tried to make out I'm the perv because you were caught out. Ask anyone on DA what shotacon means and they'll tell you it's little boys looking sexy (wat), or fucking each other and getting raped (because children can not consent, all shotacon sex is rape).
I don't care. Aw, paedophilia is kawaii and romantic, but only if it's a drawing ^^
No. That's like some guy telling me he only watches Hentai because it's adorable, really, he hates boobs with burning passion. If it's an obsession it doesn't make sense. The only reason I don't think you're a pedo is because you're under 20+, and that's when your brain kind of rewires itself in what it's supposed to be attracted to (not children), if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo. So you're the fucking ignorant twat, I'd love it if you explain to me how children kissing older guys/eachother isn't sexual? Calling it 'romantic' doesn't make it any less sexual. You have some nerve, you need a call out thread.
"Tell me if those were real kids in a child porn magazine you'd be okay with it."
this is irrelevant. c:
Except it's not irrelevant. c:
Yes it is. <3
Because this has nothing to do with real life child exploitation.
It is parallel to child exploitation so it stands to reason that I'm going to use examples like that have something to do with child exploitation. If you don't know why, don't bother replying, I can't explain everything to you.
When was I angry?
"You're also disregarding my examples of why getting kids to tongue/French kiss for pervs like you is sexual because of the theme and audience it's targeting (not kids)"
OHEEEEEEEEEYYYY WHAT'D I SAY EARLIER.... HMMMM
"Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one."
Kissing is not sexual. Taking off shirts isn't sexual. 'Suggestive' is mildly sexual, and it's sort of in the middle area I suppose, because there is no explicit sexual actions taking place but it's still an implication. As I have taken note of to clarify for you before, kissing does not count as sexual contact. (And I'm not talking about making out/french kissing etc)
-[link] - May pay off to actually read it. :')
"It is parallel to child exploitation so it stands to reason that I'm going to use examples like that have something to do with child exploitation. If you don't know why, don't bother replying, I can't explain everything to you."
Fictional kids are suddenly the same as real sexual abuse.
I'm laughing.
See? You are stupid. End of debate, I can't argue with ignorant and misplaced arrogance.
>All true signs of a not-angry person who can argue civilly and coherently, I'm sure.
Yep!!!!!!!! Says you.
"You are stupid. End of debate"
And we go back to the start of what you just posted then realise that you've done exactly the thing you accused me of doing in the same post~~~~~nekonekomiminya
'U STARTED EET I CAN DO IT ALL I LYKKKKK FUK MATURITYYYY ILL BE AS BAD AS YOU!!!!'
tl;dr you failed to be the better person regardless so... :U Lol "You loose my respect by doing that, so expect to loose the privileges that come along with it."
Loose?
Learn English. <3
I can also point out every single spelling mistake (and grammar!!!!!!!!!!) you made in almost all of your posts but I'm not a pedant (I totally am 8U). I'm demonstrating how your abuse proves you were angry and why I countered it with abuse to rile you and you spout crap again as if I'm justifying it. Lol. Pay attention to what we're arguing about.
Okay, I'd like to see that. I've noticed that you can't handle when people aren't being serious so I think I'll be laughing my ass off if it happens to be so that you think WEN I TYP LIK DIS N AL CPSLK N STUF KAWAI DESU NEKO KEYBOOARDDDSSSS I'm genuinely typing like I normally would. Unless you're going to baww because I don't put 'u' in certain words, that works too. Either way this will be entertaining.
"I'm demonstrating how your abuse proves you were angry and why I countered it with abuse to rile you and you spout crap again as if I'm justifying it. Lol. Pay attention to what we're arguing about."
This coming from someone who has demonstrated several times that they were unable to follow the argument. How amusing.
That's not how you counter argue at all. It would be better if you had said something like: "Assuming I was angry and your attempt to rile me worked." Because now I can safely assume that I was right and I did work you up. You need to be a bit more on the defensive and less on the offensive to balance it out. A 'No u' sort of reply makes you look butthurt and guilty as charged. ;)
Hmm, find where I've done this in my regular typing then. I sure can't!
"you format like a twelve year old."
Or you attempt to read normal formatting but you have the understanding of a twelve year old, I guess. The insults are funny, though.
"Because now I can safely assume that I was right and I did work you up. "
Nah. There has only been like, one person who actually did kind of irritate me over this whole thing but it wasn't you and it was actually just something over skype. I'm not going to take some people on dA or EDF or whatever the fuck else seriously enough to get upset over it, sorry.
"A 'No u' sort of reply makes you look butthurt and guilty as charged.
pfft
Rich when it's coming from you to be honest.
Lol. No u again?
:')
There is a certain style like that but She's not Defending that style
She already told you she doesn't find it sexualy attractive so i think the part your not understanding is the diffrence bettween oh its cute and oh shit lets fap to it
Its not ALL sexual
"if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo" "The only reason I don't think you're a pedo is because you're under 20+" so why are you shouting at her?
And finnaly, ITS A FUCKING DRAWING!!!!!!!! pedophilia hurts people it ruins peoples life's, and to compare all that to a drawing makes you a fucking asshole.
Now I do not care about you or your fetishes because you don't go around messing with people who have them. So stop white knighting, it makes you stupid by association.
*how
Teeheehee but I'm not in trouble, I'm just arguing with a silly person! You're very bad at making me look bad. But talking about me is so adorbsssss, I'm giggling.
"Hw is liking children fuck and kiss not weird? It is weird."
The only person who has mentioned kids fucking is you. x3
"She said down under she found children kissing cute, that means she'd pretending she doesn't like kissing, doesn't like the porn part, but she doesn't know how to lie properly she exposed herself by making this stamp. "
Yes I do find fictional boys of any age between 10 and 20 cute! I'm not going to lie about that. The sex isn't to my taste, though.
And this stamp hasn't 'exposed' anything. c:
^ the sound of a butthurt non-troll if you ask me.
Nope, lol. Most Shota = kids fucking, I didn't make that up. And yes it has, it's exposed your hypocrisy. Have a good day.
"Most Shota = kids fucking"
Hmm, but you did make up that most = all, then, didn't you? ;D
Most Shotacon = kids fucking. Look it up.
I did look it up. Most? SOME. :')
Almost all I'm afraid. If it wasn't so it wouldn't have it's own genre.
ha haa ha worst logic omg
>I know exactly what shotacon means and what weeaboos are saying when they call a picture they made shota
So, I'm a weeaboo because I like shota, huh? Newsflash! I fucking hate weeaboos, I hate the Japanese language, I hate Japanese food/life/everything, basically. I don't give a shit about Japan at all, I just know the terms for these things and I don't know an english term for it (I'm not gonna go around like YEAH I SAW THIS CUTE KIDDIE PORN OF TWO 12 Y/O BOYS KISSING LOLOLOL!!! because that would seriously be implying it's pornographic sexual content, which I'm not into anyway)
"I would like you to name one popular manga or anime that is referred to by the mangaka as shotacon "
1, I barely read manga or watch anime anymore. That was like when I was 13? Also, adding 'popular' in seems a bit stupid. So something has to be popular before you give a fuck about the fact that not all shota is pornographic? How conceited. <3
"That's like telling me Yaoi isn't about boys fucking each other and we all know that's bullshit."
That's like saying that shipping in general - yaoi, yuri, hetero, is all about sex. It isn't. I've read 'fluff' yaoi and seen it, I've seen and read the same for shota and hetero, everything else. Not everyone wants to make shit fuck each other all the time. :u I'm guessing the only yaoi you've ever found (probably searching for it, haha) is ridiculously 'porn without plot' kind, which is only popular with horny fucktards.
"me of being the one who's fucked in the head when you're the one who likes shotacon, "
Being unable to accept someone who likes shotacon, nonsexually, and only in non-suggestive pieces shows an inability to handle it. A fear, perhaps, that someone likes something you have been raised to hate for your stupid reasons such as LOL ITS ALL SEX LOL CHILD PORN, when it isn't. Clearly you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, because I sure do and I actually took my time to look up whether it is supporting pedophilia etc and I found that it wasn't. There is nothing wrong with liking child characters doing fluffy things.
"I would have forgiven your little slip if you hadn't tried to make out I'm the perv because you were caught out."
Caught out? What the fuck are you talking about? And I didn't try to make out you're the perv but now you're trying to ram in all of this 'shota and yaoi is always sex!!!' thing, I am really starting to think you are quite perverted and fucked in the head for thinking that way. :3 I sure don't.
"Ask anyone on DA"
dA - Now an accurate demographic of people with a brain. What fucking irony!
"I don't care. Aw, paedophilia is kawaii and romantic, but only if it's a drawing ^^"
Dude, real child porn is disgusting. I don't see the problem with liking absolutely harmless fictional content at all. :/ (Also, Kawaii is the most fucking stupid word to use, you fucking weeaboo.)
"That's like some guy telling me he only watches Hentai because it's adorable, really, he hates boobs with burning passion."
Hentai - "A work of anime or manga (or any similar medium) that contains sexual or pornographic art"
Hentai is made to be pornographic. It is a genre of porn. Shotacon CAN be a genre of porn, as can lolicon, but it is not ALWAYS. I don't see what's so hard about understanding that there are people who exist who do not like the sexual kinds of shota and loli etc, while there are some that do.
Basically, if you were to compare the whole range of shota to something while claiming it is all as bad as hentai, you might as well say 'EVERYONE INTO ANIME IS A FUCKING PERVERT!!!' Because, ho snap, not all anime is sexual, right? Not all shota is sexual! Hentai is sexual while SOME shota is sexual! If you're smart enough to realise what I'm trying to say by now I guess you should pat yourself on the back or something.
"if you're over 20 and still fapping to shota; definitely a pedo."
Fapping? When the hell did I ever say I got off to this shit? As I said in the journal that is linked in the description - I do not like sexual shota, and I am not sexually attracted to shota in general. I just think that shota - which for me is basically like 10/11/12/13 year olds doing things that can be seen is yaoi (I'll reiterate as you may be too stupid to have forgotten not all yaoi is sexual) - is pretty cute? I mean really, I find non-sexual yaoi, and yuri, and hetero stuff cute as well. I just like relationships I guess?
"So you're the fucking ignorant twat, I'd love it if you explain to me how children kissing older guys/eachother isn't sexual?"
I said before, I hate adult/child relationships. That is an adult exploiting a minor and I'm not even going near that shit because I just don't like it. Adults can be with adults, kids can be with kids. Not mixing them up in that way. :/
No, I'm not the ignorant one because I know what I'm talking about. You make poor assumptions and also act like everything must be pornographic because some of it is, which it isn't.
Kissing isn't sexual, lol. If a kid kisses another kid, it's not sexual.
"(2) "Sexual contact" means any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person done for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire of either party or a third party."
So basically, as long as genitalia isn't involved, or otherwise erogenic places... It's not sexual. :/ A cute hug or a kiss or just playing together isn't sexual. If they started having sex in any way (including oral) yes, that would be sexual shota. Please get your facts straight and make sure you are not making false assumptions before you try to argue, as it DOES make you look incredibly ignorant.
"You have some nerve, you need a call out thread."
ha ha oh man fucking bite me, I don't care if I get a 'call out thread', go make one if you're that butthurt over it! x3
Being unable to accept someone who likes shotacon, nonsexually, and only in non-suggestive pieces shows an inability to handle it. A fear, perhaps, that someone likes something you have been raised to hate for your stupid reasons such as LOL ITS ALL SEX LOL CHILD PORN, when it isn't. Clearly you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, because I sure do and I actually took my time to look up whether it is supporting pedophilia etc and I found that it wasn't. There is nothing wrong with liking child characters doing fluffy things.
Non sexually is the key word. From your contradicting argument I gather that you like it sexually but are too wuss to admit it. Why the fuck should I accept it? Give me one reason why I should be okay with pictures of kids fucking/getting fucked? Open mindness? Don't try to analyze me because I'm not okay with comic version of pedophilia being all over DA, you're a dumb little girl who has no idea what she's talking about. Drop it. And, you took your time to look it up? Clearly an indicator that you didn't fully know what it was beforehand. Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one.
Caught out? What the fuck are you talking about? And I didn't try to make out you're the perv but now you're trying to ram in all of this 'shota and yaoi is always sex!!!' thing, I am really starting to think you are quite perverted and fucked in the head for thinking that way. :3 I sure don't.
Okay, retard. Name me one popular Yaoi/shotacon that isn't sexual. I just need one, because everyone (but you) seems to know if it's clean it's Shonen ai, otherwise it's Yaoi. And yes, you are a perv, and you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently. You keep calling me a perv like it's insulting, I don't really care for the word but I don't find it offensive in the least. Problem is, it's not my perversion that we're discussing it's yours.
Hentai is made to be pornographic. It is a genre of porn. Shotacon CAN be a genre of porn, as can lolicon, but it is not ALWAYS. I don't see what's so hard about understanding that there are people who exist who do not like the sexual kinds of shota and loli etc, while there are some that do.
Basically, if you were to compare the whole range of shota to something while claiming it is all as bad as hentai, you might as well say 'EVERYONE INTO ANIME IS A FUCKING PERVERT!!!' Because, ho snap, not all anime is sexual, right? Not all shota is sexual! Hentai is sexual while SOME shota is sexual! If you're smart enough to realise what I'm trying to say by now I guess you should pat yourself on the back or something.
Yaoi is also gay-guy porn, I'm not debating what is porn and what is not, that's what you're doing. I actually do understand that some shota fans don't read the pornographic manga (some, you're obviously not one of them), which is why I don't think everyone who watches/reads shota is a pedo, however you're defending the whole genre while pretending you don't really like it. You also seem to find other people, furries, car fetishists, and such perverts and nasties. This makes you a hypocrite, because how is sexualizing children any less weird? If you weren't such a hypocrite your fetishes would be okay to me, I wouldn't care. But since you care about everyone else's, how does it feel to have a better version of your own badly made medicine?
Fapping is an expression, meaning you get some sort of pleasure from viewing it, I didn't mean it literally. But since you're taking it so seriously, I'd say this is a true sign of guilt.
I said before, I hate adult/child relationships. That is an adult exploiting a minor and I'm not even going near that shit because I just don't like it. Adults can be with adults, kids can be with kids. Not mixing them up in that way. :/
No, I'm not the ignorant one because I know what I'm talking about. You make poor assumptions and also act like everything must be pornographic because some of it is, which it isn't.
Kissing isn't sexual, lol. If a kid kisses another kid, it's not sexual.
A lot of shota has relationships between minors and older people, so no, apparently you don't know what you're talking about. And kids kissing kids aimed at an audience of older women and men is sexual because the audience would be fapping to it. If there was a magazine about kids kissing and doing 'suggestive'- not entirely sexual things to each other, it would be considered sexual exploitation of children because of the audience. So don't try to act coy and think before you speak.
So basically, as long as genitalia isn't involved, or otherwise erogenic places... It's not sexual. :/ A cute hug or a kiss or just playing together isn't sexual. If they started having sex in any way (including oral) yes, that would be sexual shota. Please get your facts straight and make sure you are not making false assumptions before you try to argue, as it DOES make you look incredibly ignorant.
No, it's still sexual because it's in the shota genre. If pedophiles find kids playing sexual and we go make a magazine for pedos with kids playing in it, how is it not sexual exploitation? Now you look ignorant. The only thing that positive about it is it's not real, having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone. Because the real community is replaced with a bunch of people who fap to animals having sex, kids having sex/kissing, cars having sex, MLP's having sex, Hello Kitty having sex...you catch my drift.
You will be getting a call out soon, so try to keep some of your butthurt for then. <3
"Lol, butthurt? You're the one who made this butthurt stamp because you can't handle being seen like the weeaboo, hypocrite you are, not me. "
Ooh, let's look at what a weeaboo is!
[link] (Because this kind of slang isn't going to be in a proper dictionary, hahaha)
"Weeaboo (a.k.a Wapanese) is an English slang used to describe a person (typically of non-Asian descent) who prefers Japan and all things in Japanese over one’s indigenous culture. The term is a successive mutation of “Wapanese,” a derogatory slur referring to western Japanophiles with a strong bias towards Japanese cultural and tech imports."
Hmm, oh, wait - Didn't I just say that I don't like Japanese things? Wow, I must be a weeaboo even though I don't like japanese things all that much! Never knew it!
"Pretending you're not because you hate Japan? Lol. It doesn't work that way. "
A weeaboo would become extremely offended with anyone who hates their precious pockyland. I don't give a fuck about it. Hm, must be a weeaboo even though I don't really care that much about Japanese things....
Also, from the above article.
" Wapanese: a slur used to describe a white person who is obssesed with japanese culture. This would include manga/hentai/and anime.
- The Racial Slur Database, 2002"
I'm not /obsessed/ with shota. I like it and if I come across it I d'aww and move on. So really, I don't see how you could make an argument out of that within this context. xD
But I must be a weeabooooooooo desu desu kawaii nyan sasuke is my husbando and I married my pillow sparkle pinku sailor meow vocaloid luka and named it spongebobu.
(Haha you're so silly I bet you'll think that was serious!)
"Non sexually is the key word. From your contradicting argument I gather that you like it sexually but are too wuss to admit it."
That is pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. No, I do not like it 'sexually', at all. I don't get sexually aroused by underdeveloped little children. :/ I prefer... oh, jeez, real people? Like, wow, never would have thought that real people of my own age would be my main attraction right now. Pedophiles are sexually attracted to children, fictional/non-fictional. I am not sexually attracted to real children or fictional children.
"Why the fuck should I accept it? Give me one reason why I should be okay with pictures of kids fucking/getting fucked? Open mindness? Don't try to analyze me because I'm not okay with comic version of pedophilia being all over DA, you're a dumb little girl who has no idea what she's talking about."
Excuse me, but I'm not okay with pictures of kids in sexual actions either, believe it or not. Children exploited sexually or drawn for that purpose so sick fucks who DO like sexual loli/shota is just not my thing at all. In real life, when it is damaging a real child's life, it's fucking disgusting and I would hurt the people doing it if I could.
Shota (and I guess I should argue for loli even though I'm not into that because it's basically the same but with girls) is not always sexual. If you saw 'the comic version of pedophilia' on dA, it would be something involving sexual contact which is against the TOS anyway, so I don't know where you're getting this shit from unless you actively search for it. I haven't seen explicitly sexual shotacon on here (but I don't go around looking for it so yeah mileage may vary.)
I may be younger than you but I do know what I'm talking about. Your readiness to make insults in the stead of actual arguments moreso with each message (refer to the above comments about how I am a 'weeaboo' and a 'hypocrite') proves to me that you are incapable of arguing properly. It's like arguing with a child and all they can come up with is 'BUT YOU'RE STUPID!!!!' rather than a rational argument.
I even went through the trouble of looking things up to correct you when you acted like your opinion were based on fact - in some cases, yeah, it's okay to say that SOME things are sexual, but some aren't. Then again, it's not exactly just to compare something entirely sexual (refer to comment about 'hentai' in the above post you made) to something which is not always sexual. People have different tastes in things, and you can't lump all people into one group. At least I have a willingness to check my arguments are correct without spewing insults to make up for arguments (I mean, come on, when I insult you at least I have an argument to go with it. So perhaps you're the dumb girl who has no idea what she's talking about (my little insult here), while I can back that with the above arguments and everything thereafter. :3
"And, you took your time to look it up? Clearly an indicator that you didn't fully know what it was beforehand."
Half correct. I have ideas of what things are based upon what I have seen and heard from people, but I looked up things up for your benefit so that I could show you why you are wrong in your assumptions. Besides that, it's an indicator that I am willing to clarify my arguments with solid evidence... Which you seem to be lacking in! <3
"Doing fluffy things like what? Kissing? Taking off each others shirts? Sitting in suggestive poses? Lol. Good one."
Kissing is not sexual. Taking off shirts isn't sexual. 'Suggestive' is mildly sexual, and it's sort of in the middle area I suppose, because there is no explicit sexual actions taking place but it's still an implication. As I have taken note of to clarify for you before, kissing does not count as sexual contact. (And I'm not talking about making out/french kissing etc)
"Okay, retard. Name me one popular Yaoi/shotacon that isn't sexual. I just need one, because everyone (but you) seems to know if it's clean it's Shonen ai, otherwise it's Yaoi. And yes, you are a perv, and you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently. You keep calling me a perv like it's insulting, I don't really care for the word but I don't find it offensive in the least. Problem is, it's not my perversion that we're discussing it's yours."
I don't read whole mangas about it or 'popular' ones at that. The most I go with manga now is like, horror stuff. :/ Also, again - so if it's not popular, it doesn't count? Just because I don't care about specific yaoi/shota manga/anime/whatever it is people read or whatever about it doesn't mean I've never seen it at all. Also, 'Shonen Ai' is not shota. It's basically the term for specifically non-sexual yaoi, whereas in yaoi there are non sexual aspects. (it's not all about the gay sex lol)
I don't see how I'm a perv when hardly anything actually turns me on at all? :/ I mean, not shota or a lot of things. I can only name like 2 things that would turn me on and one of them is real life people of my own age, not cartoons. The other is just a kink of mine which I'm not overly obsessed with anyway. Perversion would be mostly (loosely) pertaining to sexual tendencies out of the norm; I'm 15, and I don't really care about sex that much yet. How am I a pervert? (Protip: I'm not.)
"Yaoi is also gay-guy porn, I'm not debating what is porn and what is not, that's what you're doing."
Yet you're the one who is basically trying to state all shota is sexual and made for the purposes of what is essentially porn, when it isn't. Most of your arguments are 'PPL FAP TO IT ITS SEXUAL' and, oh, wait, 'I'm not debating what is porn and what is not'? Really? No, you are. You're trying to tell me that EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF SHOTA EVER IS SEXUAL when I have informed you several times that it is not, and this is not the case.
you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently!
"I actually do understand that some shota fans don't read the pornographic manga (some, you're obviously not one of them), which is why I don't think everyone who watches/reads shota is a pedo, however you're defending the whole genre while pretending you don't really like it. You also seem to find other people, furries, car fetishists, and such perverts and nasties."
"(some, you're obviously not one of them)"
See, you keep making these arguments like I'm not this, I'm not that, I don't know things etc when I do. Just because you can't accept my arguments doesn't mean that I am wrong. I find pedophiles nasty. I find SEXUAL shotacon nasty. (Thus how am I defending all of it? ) I don't see how you can't understand that I do not like the sexual side of it, as much as you're trying to say I am when I'm admitting that I'm not. I have informed you also that not all shota is sexual, and I keep reiterating it to you over and over but you refuse to understand that. And you seem to be dead set on thinking that I am some kind of person attracted to this sexually when my journal, this stamp, and all of my messages concerning this have been pointing out that I'm not. Deary me, it's like other people can like the non sexual side, but I can't! Haha, what bullshit.
</i>"This makes you a hypocrite, because how is sexualizing children any less weird?" </i>
It isn't. :U Not sure what you're trying to get at here considering the points I've made.
</i>"If you weren't such a hypocrite your fetishes would be okay to me, I wouldn't care. But since you care about everyone else's, how does it feel to have a better version of your own badly made medicine?"</i>
What medicine? You're not really doing anything that would befit that saying, haha.
You don't know my fetishes. :3 None of them. (A fetish being an obsession or otherwise 'sexual fetish' and to me, shota is neither. I am not obsessed with it, and I am not sexually aroused by it, so I can hardly consider it a fetish. It's just a 'like'.)
Soooo yeah not sure what you're on about here. Just seems like you're trying to act all smart and right again when you're actually being very silly. (Assuming it's my fetish, as an example! :'D )
"Fapping is an expression, meaning you get some sort of pleasure from viewing it, I didn't mean it literally. But since you're taking it so seriously, I'd say this is a true sign of guilt.
Oh noooo better go look that up again! Here, why don't you see for yourself?. Fapping is a slang term for masturbation, and yes, I agree that that would crudely describe getting pleasure from something. However, that would be sexual pleasure. :/
you're trying to play with definitions but it's not working because you're not lying consistently! x2, now!
"And kids kissing kids aimed at an audience of older women and men is sexual because the audience would be fapping to it. If there was a magazine about kids kissing and doing 'suggestive'- not entirely sexual things to each other, it would be considered sexual exploitation of children because of the audience. So don't try to act coy and think before you speak."
I see no backing for this. At all. No facts? No quotes? No evidence? How utterly poor. Trying to pass your own opinion off as a fact with nothing to back up your claims is a good sign of someone who isn't bothering to make their argument persuasive.
Let's have some actual quotes up in here, if few because I can't be fucked to go find a whole quotebook on this subject.
"The earliest Boys' Love Genre manga of the early 1970s featured love affairs between early-teen boys, but were marketed to (female) readers of the same age. "
"Shotacon attracts mostly pedophiles, and young yaoi fangirls. "
I'm sure they speak for themselves, yes? I'm kind of hoping I don't have to theoretically hold your hand and walk you through all of this, because that would be a shame. :c
"No, it's still sexual because it's in the shota genre."
Refer to my above post where I pointed out that the shota genre has things ranging from non sexual to explicitly sexual. If it's not intended to be sexual then it is more the audience's preferences than the actual intention of the work.
(So, "If pedophiles find kids playing sexual and we go make a magazine for pedos with kids playing in it, how is it not sexual exploitation" is kind of a confusing argument. Because 1, if you made a magazine of what I assume is fictional work of kids playing together (I'm not really thinking about real children with this, though I don't think it would be very immoral if it was real children) then it is not intended to be pornographic (unless you suddenly turn round and make a conceited little argument about how it TTLY WUZ SEXUAL, U WEEABOO U DUN GET IT and I'll just laugh at that for how incredibly silly it is) but secondly, you say it's made for pedophiles, therefore it would have to be to their tastes and thus arouse their attraction to children as it's the audience.
So you're basically pointed out that if someone makes work with the intention of arousing pedophiles it is sexual exploitation, I agree with that, and I can't really be all 'no it isn't' because exploiting children for the sexual arousement of adults is exploitation of minors. :U
However, say that then the same magazine was made for people who are not pedophiles (like, just the general public) it would not be sexual exploitation because it is not intentionally aimed at pedophiles or otherwise only made for the purpose of giving people their sexual kicks.
Then the 'fault' falls upon the audience who are gaining their sexual attraction from something that is not intended to have such an effect, so you can't blame whoever made the magazine if some people take it very differently to others.
"Now you look ignorant. "
haha, back to the petty insults, I see.
"The only thing that positive about it is it's not real, having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone. "
No idea what you're talking about. So if shotacon 'gets the fuck out of deviantart' because 'most of the users flocking here' would 'like that sort of thing' the whole point of the website would be gone? I only understand half of that, but not how shota being absent from deviantart would make it worse.
"Because the real community is replaced with a bunch of people who fap to animals having sex, kids having sex/kissing, cars having sex, MLP's having sex, Hello Kitty having sex...you catch my drift. "
'Having sex/kissing'
Oh wow this is fucking gold haha so wait if someone takes a picture of themselves kissing someone (even just a friend?) it's suddenly relevant to sex and can thus be placed in what is essentially an argument about how the community of this site is full of people who sexualize everything... Just because they kiss?
Also lol'd because you put that in where all the others only say 'sex' as if it's going to change something.
"You will be getting a call out soon, so try to keep some of your butthurt for then. <3"
OHHH NOOOOO!!!!! SO SCARED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;3;3;3;3;33;3;3;3;;33;3; -crawls into pocky box nyan desu vocaloid chan boxu~ - but wat will happen to my sexual shirtless child pawn then??????!!!!! U BAKA
mkay well I think that's all of it replied to but if i missed some of it or fucked up some tags oh well oops i don't care if i did
Also, for your information, kids kissing each other and taking each others shirts off for wankers like you to watch is sexual, don't try to convince me by highlighting parts of definition and twisting it to suit your argument. And learn2comprehension, grammar, and formatting. Your wall was painfully hard to read because of your lack of all the very common English skills and your deliberate misunderstanding of what I'm saying. I said fuckers like you need to get off deviant art because you'll bring more shota fans here and obviously that's a bad thing, if you don't see why then I rest my case, you are an idiot. You started the 'petty insults', so grow some balls and accept it back. I was going to call you out on EDF but someone's got you nicely covered. Have a good day.
THE DICTIONARY QUOTES ARE TO BACK UP MY POINTS.
(Though that sure does seem a foreign concept to you, haha!)
"Also, for your information, kids kissing each other and taking each others shirts off for wankers like you to watch is sexual, don't try to convince me by highlighting parts of definition and twisting it to suit your argument."
[link]
[link]
:)
Also, taking shirts of is sexual how? Kissing is sexual HOW? Is a kiss on the cheek = FUCKING PORNOGRAPHY now?
"And learn2comprehension, grammar, and formatting."
I fucked up two tags. BIG DEAL HURR
Actually, my grammar and comprehension is fine. You just can't be bothered to read it because as I have confirmed you are lazy and terrible at arguing. I find it ironic this is coming from miss "having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone"
That is fucking sheer engrish.
"I said fuckers like you need to get off deviant art because you'll bring more shota fans here and obviously that's a bad thing, if you don't see why then I rest my case, you are an idiot."
Sorry I don't speak idiot, dear, perhaps you should speak english like you did the second time round to begin with. :3
"deliberate misunderstanding of what I'm saying"
ha ha ha no you obviously didn't bother to read where I even AGREED with you.
"You started the 'petty insults', so grow some balls and accept it back."
Not reading the arguments agaaaaiiin~ Oh silly girl~
"I was going to call you out on EDF but someone's got you nicely covered. Have a good day."
Ha ha no they don't. You're pussying out.
Also: "having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing and the whole point of this website is gone."
You want me to explain? Okay:
having said that it should get the fuck out of deviant art because then most of the users flocking here would be the ones who like that sort of thing
Shota should get out out of DA because it's attracting a disturbing audience of fetishists, weird young females and paedophiles.
and the whole point of this website is gone.
once that happens, the site will become a cesspit of porn and fetish pieces and the reason it was made (a community for artists, not pervs) will have vanished. I should have probably used 'will have' instead of 'is' though.
Nice, attempting to be condescending. Not working, you lost this argument the moment you made this stamp. And yes they do have it covered, try to enjoy it while you can.
It's quite clear that emphasis is quoting you or emphasising (WOW) while bold also serves this purpose to emphasise points of both. See it's too hard to understand for you... :'D
"I can't be expected to keep re-reading it for it to make sense, it's your duty to convey your argument properly not mine."
It's your duty to stop being a lazy fuckface and read before you keep trying.
"once that happens, the site will become a cesspit of porn and fetish pieces and the reason it was made (a community for artists, not pervs) will have vanished. I should have probably used 'will have' instead of 'is' though."
>Implying it's in the future
"Not working, you lost this argument the moment you made this stamp."
Nope. :') So adorable.
"And yes they do have it covered, try to enjoy it while you can."
hahahahahaha and where is the proof of this i want to see this now if it's more than just the pedophilia thread
I don't have a duty to do anything actually, I'm not obliged to reply and neither do I want to any more since your brain seems to be deteriorating by the second.
It is in the future, thankfully. Right now furries are on the rise.
You're in denial. It doesn't affect me. Have a good day.
Then why are you replying? Must be braindead.
Also, you seem to be stuck in the past.
Denial of what, though?
The same applies to you, you are not adding anything to this discussion except shit like : ASGHSAHFNKSGKRGTNFDA omg im so blah-blah. You're spamming my inbox with maniac rambling, I' not interested any more, stop looking for every post I made to reply to, it makes you look desperate.
Stuck in the past. Lol. You can't even counter argue, you started this, you handle it properly. Did you expect everyone to tiptoe on eggshells because loads of people like shota? Yes, it seems like you did. You couldn't even use rhetoric to convince me, you declare war from your first reply and somehow you expect tolerance.
I'll leave that for you to figure out.
"I' not interested any more"
Lol I'
Then what' making you keep on replying to me, then? I mean, really, it' not like I' making you do it.
"stop looking for every post I made to reply to, it makes you look desperate."
Stop going through my comments and replying to people and maybe I'll look more desperate than you. :')
>Stuck in the past. Lol.
Furries are pretty much settled here, man. It's not the most 'rising' thing.
"Did you expect everyone to tiptoe on eggshells because loads of people like shota? Yes, it seems like you did."
And it seems that you think you can pass your opinions off as facts. No, I didn't think that. Why do you think I made this stamp and put it here? :') I wasn't expecting anyone to agree with me.
"You couldn't even use rhetoric to convince me, you declare war from your first reply and somehow you expect tolerance."
lmao ok then?????
*I'm. And I stopped the moment you hinted it was bothering your friend. I actually have no beef with her, so I probably could've left her alone. You on the other hand keep going on and on and on and on using ad hominem and making ridiculous impersonations of I'm not sure what and yourself while making sure you contribute next to nothing to this non-debate.
I didn't pass of any of my facts as opinions. All of my 'opinions' were facts. Which is: Most shota is sexual in nature. (Which you're arguing against even though you're 'apparently' not interested in sexual shota.) You have yet to provide me with a single ounce of evidence (other than definitions) that this isn't true. Show me one manga that is shotacon, that is innocent and non-sexual, just one. I'll leave you alone. It shouldn't be hard to fin even if you don't even read manga. In fact, if shotacon is mostly innocent as you claim all you have to do is look it up and you'd find loads. I can't find any, maybe you can help me?
I'm arrogant is why I'm still talking to you, it will be my downfall. I like being right especially when I am. Even though I probably shouldn't feed your butthurt, my carnal reaction is to respond.
"And I stopped the moment you hinted it was bothering your friend. I actually have no beef with her, so I probably could've left her alone"
Him. :'D
"You on the other hand keep going on and on and on and on using ad hominem and making ridiculous impersonations of I'm not sure what and yourself while making sure you contribute next to nothing to this non-debate. "
Fuck, learn to use commas and I'll read the bullshit you spew a bit more.
"All of my 'opinions' were facts."
Opinions are not facts. :'D Oh wow, even I know that.
Also, I'm not interested in sexual shota so why would I know if it's sexual, when I focus on the non-sexual stuff? I mean jesus fuck didn't that ever become apparent that I might just not go look for the sexual stuff. I mean what am I meant to do, make a tally of how many sexual or non sexual pictures I found to say 'yep there's more of this' or whatever?
"Show me one manga that is shotacon, that is innocent and non-sexual, just one. I'll leave you alone. It shouldn't be hard to fin even if you don't even read manga."
Really? From what I've seen, this is how you react when faced with shota images that aren't sexual, so I don't see why I should when you're going to be so immature about it. 'It is sexual because it's made for people to fap to!' Uhm... No? That's just some kids hugging and some neko or whatever playing with another one's ears. I doubt they were made to be 'omg hot' or whatever.
Go find it yourself, is all I can say, because you won't even listen to someone who did some searches and found those pictures when he doesn't like shota in the first place. Yet, y'know, everyone who argues with you is a 'fuckwit' and apparently into shota.
It's funny because you act like I'm the one getting all mad and insulting people but then you call two other people names (imbecile and fuckwit, iirc) right off the bat and one of them wasn't even talking to you (but you went and did the 'desperate' thing and had to go through old comments anyway to make more replies, derp.)
"I can't find any, maybe you can help me?"
Considering you are unable to even use google without my help, I'm just gonna stick with the fact you can't. :') Though, really, I'm just gonna point out when faced with non-sexual images you try to make out they are, when I have already had this discussion about how when something is not intended to be sexual (such as those images) then it is the fault of the audience for finding it as such. A bit like you do. :)
"I'm arrogant is why I'm still talking to you, it will be my downfall. I like being right especially when I am."
Too bad you're not then, isn't it?
"You tried to elegantly save him and failed. And according to him I'm a fucktard and a fucking asshole, he said it off the bat not I."
"ALSO Herpafuckingderp ==> [link] [link] [link] that's what the fuck shota is fucktard, explain to me how finding that cute makes someone a pedophile? well the fuck done
Where does it say 'fucking asshole'? I don't see it! :3 Making up insults.
"I explained to you already why it's sexual. You didn't explain to me why it isn't. You just say it's cute and fluffy. A very convincing argument indeed. "
You explained nothing, I did.
"Also, see?
You lose this debate the moment you refuse to provide evidence. The weight of evidence resides on your shoulders not mine, I am not going to provide you with your evidence. I can provide proof for my position however: [link] I just typed in shota and look what I got."
The best part is, I can just look at that and there's an equal balance between the sexual pictures and non-sexual. :') So you basically just proved my point.
"You talk about me being rude and offensive yet I toned down just for you so that maybe you could maybe focus on the debate instead of trying seem edgy and right. Nope, still unable to use reason. Ironic."
Trying to seem edgy and 'right' again, I see.
Or you could, you know, look properly.
You explained nothing. All you did was provide dictionary definitions and your own opinion which is: "it's cute and fluffy therefore it's not sexual, and real child porn has nothing to do with this :333333".
Except it's all picture of kids either getting fucked or waiting to get fucked, there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to. You still haven't provided evidence, you've admitted your defeat by this.
I am right. Lol. You're just in denial.
"You explained nothing. All you did was provide dictionary definitions"
Suddenly, definitions don't explain anything! Jeez, they must be so useless, then. Or maybe you don't know what a definition is.
"it's cute and fluffy therefore it's not sexual, and real child porn has nothing to do with this :333333"
... Which is true. Real childporn is REAL children being exploited. Fictional work is not real children, sexual or not. When something is 'fluffy' it is not sexual at all, usually not even romantic or anything of the sort. So I don't see your point here.
"Except it's all picture of kids either getting fucked or waiting to get fucked, there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to."
I counted images that I found explicitly sexual, suggestive and non sexual. :3
18 'Non sexual' (No genitalia depicted, fully clothed)
5 'Suggestive' (Half clothed, in suggestive poses, etc)
8 'Sexual' (Containing clear depictions of sexual contact or genitalia)
I would show an image marking out this but I know better than to link to explicit images, unlike you have. (Which I suppose is worth reporting, considering you did link to a page showing explicit sex. :/ )
"there is no equal balance, you're seeing what you want to."
I saw the same things you did, actually. You're picking out the porn, and seeing what you want to, really.
you have yet to prove that you won. :/
"I am right. Lol. You're just in denial."
Like you're in denial that non-sexual shota exists? Heeeeeeee how funny.
So, you say I made up an insult and when I show where he said it you say 'irrelevant'? I see what this is. You and your friend haven't heard the word fuckwit before and it offends you. He attempted to white knight for you and it went wrong, call the waambulance. Maybe if you get the party sized dildo out of your ass and jerk each other off in consolation you'd feel better.
There were 27 pictures of kids with dicks getting fucked or jerking each other off, all the manga that was displayed was that of kids having sex. The rest were either sexually suggestive (majority) and an extreme minority of them were just anime young boys referred to by fans as shota. You can't do maths either it would seem.
I'm concluding this discussion, I can't be bothered to even bother you any more. It's no longer fulfilling when you make it so obvious that you're extremely butthurt with your 'TEHEEEHEHEHEHE'. For a self proclaimed troll, you really are a failure.