Comment on Error in Reading the Bible by TESM
And what leads you to that conclusion?
It's a nice thought, but it should be grounded and supported by some rationale.
It's a nice thought, but it should be grounded and supported by some rationale.
Well, every "Good Book" of the three main religions claims that the God it holds the Holy Words of is The God, The One True God, The Only True God, Accept No Substitutions, Etc.
There is only one way for all three to be right, if the "Good Books" are the words of man, not God and whatever God is, he/she/it had no favorites among the children, didn't bother to write a tract for them to follow and hopes that each of us will grow enough during our allotted time to not totally shame him/her/it - they are all praying to the same entity, which they've cloaked in various descriptions to allow them selves to get a "feel" for something so much more infinite than themselves.
Of course, it's just as likely that the various Gods of the Good Books are no more relevant to reality than the Easter Bunny or Great Cluck, other than the millions of savageries committed in their various names.
I, like any other believer or non-believer, have a theory without fact to back it up.
There is only one way for all three to be right, if the "Good Books" are the words of man, not God and whatever God is, he/she/it had no favorites among the children, didn't bother to write a tract for them to follow and hopes that each of us will grow enough during our allotted time to not totally shame him/her/it - they are all praying to the same entity, which they've cloaked in various descriptions to allow them selves to get a "feel" for something so much more infinite than themselves.
Of course, it's just as likely that the various Gods of the Good Books are no more relevant to reality than the Easter Bunny or Great Cluck, other than the millions of savageries committed in their various names.
I, like any other believer or non-believer, have a theory without fact to back it up.