So explain to me why you're attacking me for liking the article (which is far from being bad), as I said all I wanted to do was practice some typographical design and that I didn't want to debate the numerous problems of Metroid: Other M anymore.
How is it attacking you if I said my own thoughts about the article that you did not write, while still did comment on your art and said it was good?
Then you asked me yourself to further explain why I thought the article wasn't good and so I did, without even once berating you personally for liking the article might I add.
You only said you didn't want a debate in your last comment and I pretty much did what you wished for and stopped after a P.S. note.
Then you asked me yourself to further explain why I thought the article wasn't good and so I did, without even once berating you personally for liking the article might I add.
You only said you didn't want a debate in your last comment and I pretty much did what you wished for and stopped after a P.S. note.
Look, I like the article and I hate the game. You hate the article and you like the game. Let's just leave it there.
What makes you think I like the game? For all you know I hate the game also, but still hate the article.
And now, we're starting a debate again.
Hey man, you alleged me of attacking you, which I have just stated is completely untrue.
This has never been a debate on the quality of Other M.
This has never been a debate on the quality of Other M.