lol what you are telling me right now are assumptions. Let's say you went to New York for a vacation. You are technically "roaming around in a neighborhood you don't live in". Does that give anyone the right to shoot you? Nope. Let's say you were in New York "roaming around" wearing a black hoodie or sweater because it was cold outside. I mean, New York is a pretty cold place. You're wearing a sweater, roaming around, does that give anyone the right to shoot you? I don't think so. And you do not shoot someone because of the way they dress. That's ridiculous. Is this seriously what America has come to? So you mean to tell me that if I wear a hoodie with the hood on my head, anyone in the neighborhood can shoot me because I look "suspicious"? As for the drug creation with the drink and the skittles, those were found out AFTER Trayvon was shot. Honestly, I don't mean to sound rude or anything like that, but Zimmerman could have easily avoided shooting Trayvon. He could have called the cops and stopped the whole thing for happening. Plus, Zimmerman was pursuing Trayon by car. After the dispatcher told him to stop following Trayvon, he got out of his car and followed him by foot. Sigh...that means that Zimmerman disobeyed authority rules.
I mean come on! If some random man with a gun followed me in the dark, I'd be scared too and I would have said something too. That's not called attacking. My opinion will remain the same; Zimmerman is guilty for killing an innocent man based on pure assumptions.