*Sigh* What typical, "All women are perfect and faultless and you are a misogynist and religous nut for daring to disagree and critisize vagina-owners".
Before I go into my opinion (it will be long, as most of my explanations) on this, while I will never change it, and do not care how ‘controversial’ it is, I understand I cannot, and therefore, will not, stop others from engaging in the aforementioned acts/using the following products. You are entitled to do so, after all, with Free Will, but that does not mean I must weakly submit to it, and believe and support it.
Sexual intercourse is the biological process of creating a new life. It is not some sick act of ‘pleasure’. The process which take place within it – the man producing semen and sperm, the women’s contractions – are all the evidence needed to show this undeniable truth. Sex is only natural when used for the natural, REPRODUCTIVE purpose. It is NOT, not matter how many fools say it, when contraception is used and it is about pleasure alone. The ONLY reason the 'pleasure' exists is make the process of child-making not entirely uncomfortable, especially for women. It is there to encourage reproduction. I have known this for a very long time. Before anyone starts their assumptions, I was not taught this, not by my mother, priests, nuns and Chapel, etc. I came to this conclusion entirely on my own. I know about reproduction from a very young age (six) as I asked the "Where do babies come from?" question. Mum bought me a book, which, for something for children, still went into the detail about the sexual process, reproductive organs and childbirth. This began my view. My view was cemented when I had reproduction classes in Biology in Secondary School. I never let my religion dictate my views.
In my opinion, if you have sexual intercourse for pure pleasure instead of its natural reproductive purpose, French-kiss, give hand/oral sex to a man, touch a penis, or masturbate, while un-married or female, you are a weak, immature, slut/whore/skank/living sex doll with no self-respect, dignity or honour. It shows that you have no control over yourself or your body. It shows you are a self-oppressor, who could not be any LESS ‘sexuality liberated’, and cannot be disgusted by anything sexual, or claim superiority, lest you are a hypocrite. In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut, especially if the person feeling it is female. Before anyone accuses me of ‘sexism’, ‘misogyny’ or ‘Double Standards’, I do not WANT to dislike women doing it more, I cannot help it, due to the way heterosexual intercourse naturally works – men are the penetrators who obtain bodily ownership, women the penetrated, who give up bodily ownership; which is also the non-sexist reason the double standard exists. Real, strong, intelligent women would never desire and enjoy such a thing – a man dominating, defiling and invading them with his ugly, filthy, disgusting penis (no offence to men) for his own selfish pleasure. Most animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, and even if it is for sick pleasure, they do not try to stop the good, natural outcome (pregnancy) so humans should as well.
Speaking of reproduction, it is disgusting that, nowadays, pregnancy, the whole point of intercourse, is considered a ‘risk’ of said action and is treating like another STD. It is seen as a BAD thing if a woman is pregnant. Oh yes, because bringing a new life into the world is such a horrible, bad thing. We have lost all respect for it. Pregnancy is a miracle of life and should always be treated as such (though I am not saying rape is acceptable thought this). While I understand contraception can stop STDs, I am still against it, as, if people understood sex and did not want diseases or pregnancy; they would not have had sexual intercourse. On this subject, I must say this: abortion is selfish. There is no other reason for it than selfishness, and it makes even EXISTING punishable. Excluding rape, it is the mother and father's fault for being as slutty and perverted as to engage in sex for pleasure. If one does decide to do this, and the woman becomes pregnant, they have no right to complain and then proceed to murder the child with an abortion (yes, a foetus IS alive, as cells are living things. Even the tiny amebae is a living thing), just so they (or she) can escape having to raise her own child. They should have to live with the consequences of their lust and lack of self-control. I LOATHE the term ‘unwanted/unplanned/accidental pregnancy’ as that is impossible. How dare people call a wonderful new life an ‘accident’, a ‘parasite’ or a ‘mistake’. No sex means no babies, and therefore no overpopulation. Not to mention, anyone who supports abortion is an innate hypocrite, as we all were foetuses once, and most do not support the Death Penalty, either, further showing hypocrisy (it also makes me laugh when they say it is ‘their’ body, when, by being a non-virgin, they gave up their body to a man). Just think about it, if no one had sex for pleasure, only for reproduction; there would not really be any need for abortion. The rate of abortion would fall greatly. We should be focusing on how to make pregnancy as painless and non-dangerous as possible, not how to end it before the baby is even born. We should put money towards SAVING lives, not taking them away.
One final bad thing about sex being made into something for pure pleasure is, as cheapening intercourse, it has led to not being able to have sex actually being considered a medical concern (because the concerns of sluts are SO important compared with real health and medical problems); the invention of disgusting things such as French kissing, pornography, prostitution, promiscuity not being considered disgusting or bad, and sex toys/shops.
Next, I shall speak about slut-shaming. There is NOTHING wrong with it. The clue is in the name – SLUT-shaming. Sluts deserve ridicule for their disgusting behaviour. Saying you cannot be sex-negative or judge someone for CHOOSING to have sex is just as retarded as saying you cannot judge someone for CHOOSING to kill, abuse or rape. I am so sick of sexist, hypocritical, oppressive, petty Feminazis who oppose a right to an opinion, by opposing perfectly-allowed things such as slut-shaming by claiming such rubbish as it being 'sexist' , 'oppressive', 'misogynistic' or 'trying to control women' (like the SlutWalk, I was so ashamed to be female when I watched one of them, when the hilarious irony is this that THEY are allowing themselves to be controlled, by lust and men); claiming that being rightfully being anti-abortion is 'anti-woman' simply because, in most animal species, it is the females who carries the child. While doing this, they more greatly show their blatant hypocrisy and sexism by saying men, or more importantly, the FATHER has no right to an opinion about the life of HIS OWN CHILD, simply because, again due to simple biology, they do not carry that child within them. All the while, they ignore REAL world and political issues such as famine, innocents dying in war (as in, non-soldiers), racism (like calling people n*gger or *cl*ink), homophobia (such as calling someone an f*ggot), and discrimination or name-calling for something they cannot control (such as your race or orientation), and female-on-male, female-on-female, male-on-male domestic and physical abuse being dismissed, ridiculed and justified. It is people like them who are making people feel the negative way they do about feminism, by treating woman as better than men.
As for me, I am proud that my mind is clean, pure and free of sexual attraction/lust, and if anyone is going to call me ‘asexual’, as if it were not normal or good, then fuck off. I have better, more productive, intelligent and interesting things to do in life than waste it on self-oppression (yes, I of course know sexually-active people do other things with their lives, but that does change the fact that they are a non-virgin, and everything they do is only a distraction from that, as far as I am concerned). I would rather lose my life than my virginity, or partake in any sexual activity whatsoever. It is one of the few things about me I feel I can take pride in without feeling like a cocky, over-confident bitch. Before another set of fools assume this, I am also not abstinent or celibate. They mean that I have lust/sexual attraction, and I am ‘waiting’ for the ‘right person’ or marriage. Even if I do marry, my hymen is remaining intact. I do not CHOOSE not to have some pervert invade and dominate my body and I; I naturally do not do not so, as I am not a slut. What is a choice is have lust, and use contraception, to have recreational sex. I only have romantic attraction: love. Love and lust are two different things. Sexual intercourse is not love, it is lust. I am bi-romantic. I do not wish to sleep with either men or women. However, I wonder what it would be like to hold someone’s hand, take a walk with them, go out for a meal for them, or just watch TV with them. Never have I been as low and whorish as to think along the lines of “I wonder what it would be like to sleep with them”. I do not care if people think I am crazy. It is what I believe, and it has nothing to do with religion, parents, or anyone else other than myself. Besides, not having sex has been shown to lead to a longer life than those who do, according to various scientific studies.
I am a true Feminist woman, and supports equality in all its forms, including negative ways, as, unlike what Feminazies want us to believe, not all women are prefect, faultless saints incapable of any mistakes or crimes, and do not believe that merely calling a woman a name is some terrible ‘sexism’ ‘misogyny’ or any other crap they use to describe it.
Finally, before you assume the false modern definition, prude comes from "prod femmes" in pre-revolutionary France. It means an honourable woman, with high moral standards and respect for her body; someone who does/will not engage in any type of sexual behaviour because it is viewed as wrong, immature, dirty, or disgusting. A woman who has French-kissed, given a handjob/blowjob, masturbates, or is a non-virgin (even if she did not enjoy it/did it to make a man happy, and masturbation counts as a non-virgin-making act) is NOT, and never can be, a prude, despite what people say, as they have given up their purity.
Even better. Now how about I penetrate your tight lil pussy so I own you now. I'm a girl tho so I'll have to use a nice, thick strap-on. Would I still count as the penetrator?
Wow that's pretty fucken brutal for a Christian. Oh, sorry I mean Roman Catholic. So since you hate sex and you despise anyone who isn't asexual you get your pleasure through Sadism? 8D
Well, I'm going to hell anyway, I'm sure. No, I don't 'despise' anyone who is not asexual. It's their snobbish, selfish, hyppocrital oppressive, attitude I don't like. Hey, you propositioned me, so I have a reason. Besides, you offered to penetrate me, so I thought I would do the same .
basically you could have summed up your whole rambling about how fucking for pleasure is evil, weak and disgusting in four sentences. You just like to here the sound of your own voice. (even tho you can't actually hear it.) So because 99% of the world enjoy sex we're "snobbish, selfish, hyppocrital oppressive" and you aren't for hating everyone that's not like you? How old are you cause I don't think you're very experienced in life.
I am a bit lighter in that, as in, there is nothing wrong with lust, but sexual activities outside of marriage and masturbation is a sign of weakness, and stupidity. That is not to say a woman cannot make that choice. She just needs to understand what equality is, and what freedom of speech is. And learn that policing people's thoughts is the opposite of equality.
No, I don't 'hate' them, because, not being me, you can decide such a thing. I am expressing my right to an opinion ona person's choice just as I, as a human being, am judged for my choices. Except, I don't act like it is some terrible, soul-destroying 'oppression' or '-ism'.
Also don't be a hypocrite about calling other people hypocrites when you just said there're nothing wrong with lust. "In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut" -you Well then all women who aren't asexual are sluts. You're just a stuck up bitch who likes to find ways to feel better then everyone, aren't you?
As I said, one can change their views. I've learnt to not be so harsh.
Wrong again, sweetheart. Married women are often sexual/non-virgins. Lesbians are sexual/non-virgins. Lesbian married women are sexual or non-virgins. These are examples of a sexual woman who is not a slut. Nope, I jsut have my opinion and people don't like that. I am just not part of that common group of people.
Hey if you don't feel lust, like masturbating or having sex that's totally you're preference. But saying that everyone else who doesn't is a weak, selfish human just makes you a bigot. How is sexual pleasure weak? Because you've never experienced it or could imagine experienced. I think why you're saying it's "weak" is because it should only be experienced while trying to make children. Well what about homosexuals, huh? Are they weak because relationships should only be between a man and a woman?
I am not saying that. People, that includes women, can have sex all they want, however, certain actions, and certain reasons for having sex, can be weak, such as a woman having one-night stands or sleeping with a boyfriend she only got together with in the past month or so. It shows the opposite of 'liberation'.
No, but a woman who is desperate for that pleasure sleeps around or has to stimulate herself, is weak. When the hell did I imply I was homophobic? I fucking hate homophobes. A same-sex couple, given that they have the same reproductive organs, would a more equal, and far less selfish sex life. Plus, unlike many heterosexual women, they are not pompous about it.
This is dumb for a number of reasons. First, if sex is solely for reproduction, why do things like the female orgasm and G-spot exist?
Second, this quote. "if you have sexual intercourse for pure pleasure instead of its natural reproductive purpose, French-kiss, give hand/oral sex to a man, touch a penis, or masturbate, while un-married or female" Uh...what? So, only married gay guys can have sex for pleasure, and do all that other stuff. Got it.
Next...you callin 95% of women "not real women", bruh?
"Most animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, and even if it is for sick pleasure, they do not try to stop the good, natural outcome (pregnancy) so humans should as well." I have a few gripes with this. First, some animals eat their unwanted babies. The only reason they don't try stopping pregnancy is that they do not have the intellect nor the resources to do so. Second, some animals kill their children. Should we, as well? Last, calling pregnancy good is odd, because of the..i don't know...numerous studies showing unhappiness in becoming a parent. Speaking of which, if the mother of an unwanted baby is forced to carry and give birth to it, more often than not, she will be bitter and resentful, especially since her "boyfriend" took off. Which may lead to the kid being beaten, physically, emotionally, and sexually abused. Which is worse, being killed when you're unconscious and unable to feel, or growing up abused, mentally shutting down, hating yourself, and distrusting human beings? I'd have to go with the latter. Also, the definition of "slut" is very loose. What do you mean by it? I looked up the word "slut" on Urban Dictionary and looked at the top 20 definitions, and the most common one was "A woman that sleeps with a multitude of people." Sorry, but the stuff you listed doesn't match up with that.
"As for me, I am proud that my mind is clean, pure and free of sexual attraction/lust" Well aren't you a special snowflake.
"(yes, I of course know sexually-active people do other things with their lives, but that does change the fact that they are a non-virgin, and everything they do is only a distraction from that, as far as I am concerned)" Dafuq? If you eat a lot, is everything else you do a distraction as well?! "I am a true Feminist woman" But you previously stated that being female makes doing things such as frenching and masturbating wrong! Even if you're married! WTF?
"That is the truth you sexist bitch." Thanks for making narrow-minded assumptions. Good day.
RainyF0XFeatured By OwnerNov 5, 2014Professional Digital Artist
The first person who actually posted the longest comment is you. Let me make it up to you.
You are obviously abstaining the thing about the bi-romantic shit? Well, fuck you and your opinion, then. You don't actually know the fucking purposes of things about gay rights or shit like this:
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in the United States have evolved over time and vary greatly on a state-by-state basis.
Sexual activity between consenting adults and adolescents of a close age of the same sex has been legal nationwide since 2003, pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas. Age of consent in each state varies from age 16 to 18;[1] some states maintain different ages of consent for males/females or for same-sex/opposite-sex relations.
LGBT rights related laws including family, marriage, and anti-discrimination laws vary by state. Thirty-two states plus Washington, D.C. offer marriage to same-sex couples; these marriages are recognized by the federal government and Missouri, but not by the seventeen other states.[2] Additionally, some states offer civil unions or other types of recognition which offer some of the legal benefits and protections of marriage.
Twenty-one states plus Washington, D.C and Puerto Rico outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation, and eighteen states plus Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico outlaw discrimination based on gender identity or expression.[3] Hate crimes based on sexual orientation or gender identity are also punishable by federal law under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. In 2011 and 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that job discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals classified as a form of sex discrimination and thus violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[4]
Adoption policies in regard to gay and lesbian parents also vary greatly from state to state. Some allow adoption by same-sex couples, while others ban all unmarried couples from adoption.[5]
Civil rights for LGBT people in the United States are advocated by a variety of organizations at all levels and concentrations of political and legal life, including theHuman Rights Campaign,[6] Lambda Legal, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders(GLAD), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
PUBLIC OPINION: Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States of America A poll reports a significant finding that a majority of that state's population supports same-sex marriage.(95% significant: Result is > 0.653 of the 95% sampling error (> 1.28σ) above 50%.) A poll shows at least a plurality, and possibly a majority, of that state's population supports same-sex marriage. A poll shows a statistical tie between support of and opposition to same-sex marriage.(Statistical tie: Not distinguishable at 95% confidence. Difference between support and opposition is < 0.842 of the 95% sampling error (< 1.65σ).) A poll shows at least a plurality, and possibly a majority, of that state's population opposes same-sex marriage. A poll reports a significant finding that a majority of that state's population opposes same-sex marriage.(95% significant: Result is > 0.653 of the 95% sampling error (> 1.28σ) above 50%. No polling data within the past two years.
When a state is striped with light gray and another color, the color stripe indicates the result of the last poll for that state, in the absence of data within the past two years.A state shown with two colors indicates recent polls with conflicting results.
I think I gave you plenty enough fucking information what contradicts your eye-blinded comment.
Your "opinion" is really fucking stupid. Just saying. And I barely EVER say that an opinion is stupid.
Why your opinion is stupid?
Because:
"slut-shaming is okay" Yeeah.. HAH NO.
Slut shaming can go down different paths to the person who is being slut shamed. They could be suicidal, kill themselves, feel like they aren't important. PEOPLE HAVE REASONS TO BE WHO THEY ARE. DEAL WITH THAT BULLSHIT.
"ABORITON IS A BAD THING TO DO11111 IT MURDERS BABIES"
Abortion isn't a bad thing when it comes to rape.
Some parents don't have the MONEY to raise a child.
Please, go to that corner and rethink about what you have done.
And how many YEARS you have spent on that god awful comment of an opinion.
That is so extreme that it would make the Tea Party think you're a wing nut. Usually only trolls post dreck like that!
I always feel kind of sorry for people who are SO uptight about EVERYTHING, whether it be because of how they were raised or whatever, that they won't even enjoy lovemaking with their eventual spouse even though it's a gift from God. You seem like a very bitter/repressed/judgmental/unhappy person from that pedastal you have yourself on, and that's quite sad.
FateThehedghog943Featured By OwnerSep 30, 2014Hobbyist Writer
I understand you, but I will say, Lust is a natural thing used to drive us to have sex, there is nothing wrong with your opinion but you are the one missing out. Let me point out a few things for you there hun. French kissing, okay let's be educational here, if you didn't know, people french kiss plainly because when you kiss the male collects the females saliva with their tongue and their brain analyzes it to find out if they have compatible DNA for reproduction. That's one thing, We males Masturbate because we can have erections so very hard it hurts, I would know since I am a male, females also masturbate, humans masturbate because the drive for sex when not accessible is uncomfortable, it may make us weak but fuck being uncomfortable when we have no reason to be. like someone has said your hymen can break from things other than sex, I won't list them you are a big girl you can figure it out. You honey should open your eyes, no man is gonna marry you, (or woman) just to hold your hand people want sex, people plainly need sex, unless we just stop the flow of testosterone, which can be very unhealthy. I Don't know about you but I want to make love to my future partner be it a man or a women. Being a slut doesn't mean having lots of sex, it means fucking every person you look at, that is being a slut, and if they cause no harm I don't see a problem with it myself, because when I think about it no flow of anger fills my head. You seem to target women most in this though. Would it be wrong for a man to have consensual sex with me? Seeing as I have no Hymen from the points you made about women, I am allowed to have that kind of intercourse? THAT, is sexist honey, you are shaming your own gender altogether with no respect for the way your god created us. (yes I say "your God" since you point out "My religion" two key words there meaning you have a religion) I admire your knowledge but you have no common sense. I know common sense seeing as I have played with broken glass in the middle of the street before (I am still a slightly masculine male dammit). So let me bring you to another point, you don't decide a woman, whom may ONLY masturbate, that means they are weak, What? Tell that to the Girls who fight in the militaries across the globe to keep you safe, (depending on where you live). Most of them masturbate I bet, yet they are weak?That cracks me up, you should be careful with your points there darlin. So are males weak? We think about sex a lot more than women, apparently on average of about 29 seconds. Which makes sense to me, and I think about sex a lot. You should let off some steam and go get laid, that might cool you off their darlin.
Thanks for being this way, now we have something to do with our time, YAY Troll education! I would be so much happier doing something else~ I won't elaborate, but you go get laid honey bunch.
Actually, I am not trying to insult you NOR to rage against your opinion. Howewer, I can find a bit of misinformation in this comment and I think it have to be corrected:
1. The reason why people doesn't always want to keep their foetus is because they aren't mentally ready to take care of their offspring. I'm speaking mostly about teenagers. A child is a huge responsibility, and most teens don't have the maturity nor the time to take care of him/her. The secound reason is having someone in need in your life will private you from many freedoms. Some freedoms that some people want more than a child. The third reason is because of overpopulation. Letting your offspring growing up will just make this problem worse, because you just help the population to becaume too big by adding one person. 2. The reason why animals do not stop the good, natural outcome call ''pregnancy'' its simply because they don't have the technology nor the intelligence to take such descision. 3. It is not always true that men are the dominant one in sexual intercourse. If you're a prostitute that sells her body, then, yes, we can tell that this unknow men (or women) is dominating you... howewer if these two persons are in a couple and, indeed, truly care about each other, they will respect each other the more as possible, wich mean that the women AS WELL that the men mind the emotions and desire of their partner. If one of the two doens't want to do something, the other woun't be like: FUCK YA BITTCH YA MUST OBEY TO MEEEEE!!!!!11!!11!!!! In any case, if the other reacts like this, then it means that the ''victim'' must find another love. 4. Abortion is not selfish in anyway, because the baby is still a foetus when it happen. And foetuses can't think nor beign conscious of what death is. 5. Saying that people shouldn't do something because they will loose their honor from doign is not a valid argument. Why? Because honor is purely a matter of opinion, not a verifiable fact. 6. You are saying that animals are doign it for logical purposes. You are true about his. Howewer, what drives them to do it is their how sexual instinct, wich basically hte sexual attraction animal 7. Aslo this love your talking about came from sexual attraction. I am not talking your love, but the love that these heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals persons are feeling. 8. Lust is the term use to describe someone that have uncontrollable sexual desires, at some point that this person will have sex with anyone at anytime, because s/he is never satisifed. A sane couple won't have any of these behaviors in the partners.
You have the right to think anything you write bellow. You don't like it when people have sex for pleasure? Fine, but at last uses proven facts and the right terms to justify it.
"The reason why animals do not stop the good, natural outcome call ''pregnancy'' its simply because they don't have the technology nor the intelligence to take such descision."
Wouldn't animals eating their own young be the equivalent?
Animals kill their young to ensure that the genes of hte male they have defeated are transmitted, either because the juvenile possess mutations that not only could prevent him to survive, but that it could pass on to its own litter. And they still kill them after they were born, so the pregnancy still have occured.
*Sigh* :iconcheezeburger34:, you wimp. Didn't want to proved wrong, did you? I'll put this here anyway.
"I have poor eyesight (registered blind), asthma, and Chronic Lung Disease, and multiple allergies, and hygiene/habit OCD, you cow. Again, your lot prove your hypocrites, whinging about me expressing my right to an opinion while insulting me. I know some charities are corrupt, and that there even exists people who pose as members of a charity and then claim the money for themselves. That’s why I choose them carefully. That’s good. A few years ago, I signed up to a program that would sent people to either South America, South Africa or India, to assist in building homes and schools, but you know what? They asked for medical records, and due to what I have (and my age), I was not accepted into the program. Naturally, I was pissed. I tried again last year, and the answer was still no. I’ve now looking to see if there are any in my own country.
I’m not screaming, honey. This is text. Screaming would be implied via all capitals or italics. I am a feminist, as I fight for both men and women.
You keep thinking that, sweetie.
It is not an ‘obsession’ eejit. It is caring for life, it is valuing all life equality. I care because I care about that innocent life being taken away by some selfish bitch. I care as I am planning to adopt, and would happily take that child inside of it being killed. No, I am not. I understand that not everyone wants children. Again, if you did not, you would take part in an activity that can result in pregnancy (it is sickening that wonder that is the creation of a new life, something we all were is called a ‘risk’, ‘parasite’ and whatnot), and if you do get pregnant, you have no right to selfishly and needlessly kill that little life you once were and choose to have."
I can't read this all because you obviously are really dumb.
Dude, one thing is that, if a girl has an abortion because she can't take care of it, why the fuck do you care? I don't see you on fucking TV 'SAVING LIVES' of kids in Africa, helping them understand that mass-murder is NOT OKAY, and feeding them. NO, instead you go on here and say this stupid bullshit, saying that abortion is destroying lives. UM. THERE'S 7 BILLION PEOPLE in the world. Do you know how to count? Nope, obviously not. A billion is probably nothing to you.
Anyways, I know yours is a late comment, but go fuck yourself. Please. You are disgusting. You are not a feminist in ANY FORM. Feminists do not shame their own OR the other gender, but they support EQUALITY for both genders.
Don't know what EQUALITY MEANS?
e·qual·i·ty
iˈkwälitē/
noun
the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities.
"an organization aiming to promote racial equality"
synonyms:fairness, equal rights, equal opportunities, equity, egalitarianism; More
MATHEMATICS
a symbolic expression of the fact that two quantities are equal; an equation.
There is no ‘sexual double standard’ as sex is biologically, physically and most times, emotionally different for men and women. Men need sexual release. The whole ‘blue balls’ thing is very true, and sometimes, masturbation just will not do it. Women have nothing to keep in check, no good reason to have pointless pleasure sex. Women are penetrated, the submissive, the bottom, the uke, the receiver. Men are the penetrators, the dominators, the seme, the takers. Unless it is rape, a woman cannot ‘fuck’ or ‘dominate’ a man
Heterosexually/dildo non-virgin females are the biggest hypocrite on the planet anyway. They came to feminists, but are slaves to primitive urges and service men, they claim disgust at other people's sexual activities, but touched and let a guy stick his penis inside them/violated themselves. They claim a man 'cheated' on them, when they let another men put his penis inside them, and that man had the kindness to forgive her. And it goes on.
I am not a masochist. I do not take pleasure in anyone suffering. I would not give to charity and enjoy helping others if I did not. I would not be polite, were I so. I am perfectly progressive, as you would see if you bothered to read my later comments. I am fighting for men's rights too, like a feminist; I know that, nowadays, men are far more oppressed than women. I am stating biological facts. I formed my view through my education in reproduction classes (we do have ‘sex ed’ over here, we look at intelligently, in the biological manner, though we still learn about STDs, transgenderism and whatnot). I have known about sex and reproduction for fourteen, almost fifteen, years. as I, unlike most ‘feminists’ (once again I must say this), as I do not scream about how supporting abortion is ‘anti-women’ while turning around and saying men, even the fathers, do not deserve opinions on the life of their own child. No one cares about them having mental breakdowns. Everyone only cares about the selfish bitch who decided to get fucked and doesn’t to be responsible for the life she once were. I do not shame men’s sexuality. I do not think a man is ‘objectifying’ women by looking at them sexually, or enjoying porn, or that it is wrong for them to look a woman sexuality when she is wearing clothing meant to display the body in a sexual manner’, while they weakly fawn over men’s muscles and butts. Female who let men fuck them (as in ‘for pleasure’) are not feminists. They can do that all they like, granted, but they are hypocrites and liars to claim they are feminists when they have objectified themselves. They are anything but ‘liberated’. I am truly liberated, as I am free from slavery to lust and letting men rule me. How the hell can a woman be a ‘feminist’ or ‘liberated’ by letting men trust into her most intimate areas, taking her as a receptacle (however, again, unlike most ‘feminists’ I see nothing wrong with a man who does that, or virgin/asexual men).
Saying there is a ‘double standard’ is like saying men having penises and testicles,and women having vaginas and wombs, is ‘sexist’ or a ‘double standard’. Further biology that shows that women are not meant to be promiscuous is that they can only be pregnant by one man at a time. Not to mention, the initiate to seek out a mate with the best genes for their children, hence why most women have a lower sex drive.
Funny, your Grandmother will have most likely been a Second-Wave Feminist, not this bullshit ‘third wave’ (AKA Feminazaism, where all women are perfect angels free of judgement for their choices, or you are a misogynistic pig, but they can say what they like about men).
Finally, I am not playing Devil’s Abdicate. I am simply stating my views as I am free to do in a world of equality.
I see, I support men's rights as well, and i did read all your comments, dear
Let's make an analysis, on the theory that men are more oppressed than women nowadays
Points in your favor are that men receive higher punishments than women for the same crimes and ways they have done them, men have to be within a military selective service system (as in the US) or doing mandatory military service while women do not (With some exceptions like Israel, Brunei, etc.), and when it comes to divorce, the custody of children will go more to women than men.
As a man, I feel that men suffer from socially imposed definitions of masculinity that does not recognize the real and unique nature of male individuals. Stereotypes include for men to be sexually virile, aggressive, overtly-competitive, and tough at the face of life and taking the initiative in many aspects, from politics to the starting of sexual relations
The pitfall of your theory is that women continue to suffer under the clutches of patriarchal values (this is a fact in developing countries), Gender equality is of vital importance for these countries as such archaic ideals of gender are damaging the fair, egalitarian, and stable progress. There are two points for gender equality: The first is to acknowledge the physical difference women and men have between each other (men have a penis and women have a vagina) as this is a real fact, unless nature surprise us. another physical difference is when we describe strength levels (men being stronger due to their their more developed muscles, women being more flexible due to their more developed ligaments) where both are powerful on their own right, none overpowering the other. The second is to acknowledge that there are many practices that damage men and women by their society as they define their sexuality and gender roles (men are the perverts and the leaders while women being the virgins and followers). this is where the real problem lies. Coming back to the issues in developed countries like the UK and US, women's rights have improved, therefore feeling a sense of accomplishment for having a gender-equal society. That is a lie
When it comes to gender ideals, there are still problems. Men are still socially-required to be tough and virile while women to be kind and protective to their sexual integrity. in the case of gender roles, women are still expected to take care of the home and be in charge of the well-being of her family while men are the ones who have to provide to demonstrate their masculinity. that is not fair for any of them. the women cannot be a professional and an individual if she is given the house chores monopoly. For men, the disadvantage is to not be part of the real development of his family, to be supportive and fair.
I study women who draw women in sensual ways, I am so glad these women are against archaic values that say women are not supposed to like sex or sexual media, or another idea would be to be virgins unlit marriage. these women demonstrate that women can be great admirers of the female sexual form. Based on Nielsen, 1/3 of internet porn watchers are women in the US, is that a bad thing, nope, instead, it is positive as former monolith worlds are becoming more open and more inclusive to new audiences and new actors within them. Gender equality happens when men and women share the same or al least almost the same responsibilities of the home and their development and action in the workforce. it is true there will never be 50/50 of everything, but aiming for more fairness an integration is key for our social progress.
Now, when it comes to the issue of abortion, I believe the decision must go only with the mother if her health is in jeopardy (due to health conditions, violence, incest, and rape). if none of those problems are present, then the decision is for both as it took two to tango. Now, if the girl is a "Selfish bitch", then the guy is either a victim of violation (they exists) or just a dumbass who did not know how to protect himself if the sex was consensual. there are motherfucking men and women out there as well as male and female victims of their plots, this is due to their failure of learning values, no of the nonsense of religion, but values that teach us how to treat each other fairly and respect each other. As of now, that is not a reality yet, but working for it is worth all the wait it needs.
There are selfish women out there but try to see the whole picture, our generation is in a difficult situation, we need to redefine ourselves from horrible terms such as being Materialistic and narcissistic. we need to recognize that we are a mosaic, oven to change its forms in order to create a better artwork.
You have key points, but look at the whole picture, limited views will make you look bad rather than a person who analyses her world
It is never my fashion to insult people, I am reminding you to look at the whole picture, understand the whole possibilities, and to observe the both sides of the story
I apologize in advance for the length of the this post.
Ah, ok.
Ok, that is good to read. I agree with and understand those points. The attitudes in regards to masculinity piss me off as much as what is contained in the next paragraph. My boyfriend suffered that quite a bit recently. You know, the typical ‘tiny penis’, ‘only in it because you want sex’, ‘doormat’, ‘faggot’, ‘bitch’, etc. Not to mention, if a woman (such as myself), like feminine men/can’t stand macho/overly muscular men (mainly because I don’t want it look like he is with because I weakly want ‘protection’ or ‘saving’), she is seen as wanting to walk all over him. If the woman is in charge in the relationship (though I do not believe anyone should be ‘in charge’), he is called ‘whipped’, ‘pussy’ (God, I hate that word, especially when it is aimed at men), and ‘mangina’. There is also the excuses for female-on-male, male-on-male, and, just to cover all of them, female-on-female abuse and rape. I know it is an in intelligent thing, to use TV Tropes, but there is also The Unfair Sex, Bumbling Dad, the shaming of a Distressed Dude, and a few others I cannot recall. However, that is an area in which women suffer just as much. Men are also ignored in regard to eating disorders and in medical health in general (well, in America, in regards to the latter)
Urgh, not the rubbish ‘Teh patriarchy still exists!” rubbish. However, you are right, as it is a bad hard to repute such eloquent language. However, the only areas I can think of where women are oppressed or discriminated is in male-dominated fields, (though the reserve is true as well, of course, particularly in regards to children and intimate examination, where men are forced to have a chaperone, not when the genders are reversed). Along with this (much as Iam anti-war/anti-military) military service, in that women are forced to be in the background, behind a desk, as a medic, or using aircraft or sniper rifles, and are completely disallowed from fighting on the front line, so they are not fighting in the first place. Even more well-known, there is the countries where they are prohibited from driving, getting an education, or even voting. Finally, we have the video game industry (though that can be added to the media aspect, and men are just as stereotyped), both within games and in the attitudes and mistreatment of women employed there, along with gamers who happen to be female (I dislike the term ‘girl gamer’). Hm, I didn’t know about the looser ligaments thing. I can’t even touch my toes standing up. I guess it makes sense, though, when you consider childbirth. However, everyone can train to be stronger or more flexible, remember. I myself wish I had more muscle structure.
Again, very true, very true. I notice it most in the American media. Feminine men don’t get stereotyped as gay or wimpy as much over here. Indeed. That is I believe, regards of the genders of the people in the relationship, things such as child-rearing, housework and cooking should be shared. For example, due to my OCD, I am good at tidying and cleaning, though I do not consider it stereotypical. However, I am, well, useless in the kitchen. I can chop food, but that’s it. Mainly because I find cooking to confusing and stressful (I get too worried about being scalded or it burning). The thing about sexual virility baffles me. So, he hasn’t put his penis in some girl’s vagina? And? So? It is bad not only because it pressures men, but has also caused the attitudes that men cannot be raped, sexually harassed, or assaulted, particularly by a woman. I used to think so too (but not because of the ‘men always want sex’ thing, but rather, again, because of the biology difference between men and women), until I just realised, frankly out of nowhere, how anti-Feminist that was. It is because of my father’s treatment of my mother that I fight for male victims of abuse as well, as I said to myself “Well, what if it was your mum who was doing that? Would you say your dad deserved it?”. However, I do not tend to say this, as people tend assume, and refuse to believe otherwise, that that is where I obtained my attitudes in regards to sex. It is either that, or religion, or me being molested/raped, when nothing of the sort has happened (to think so is insulting to real victims of these heinous acts). It is also, like other things, the opposite to the ancient past. Men who slept around or had too much sex were seen as insulting their virility, particularly in Greece, and it was thought that woman could not say no to sex.
There is nothing wrong with that attitude in regard to female sexuality however (well, female heterosexuality). A woman is ‘interested in sex’ with a man wants nothing more than to be dominated, again, due to the simple biology of it and the penetrator-penetrated relationship. The attitude of virginity to marriage is understandable too, for the reasons I have previously mentioned, and that no self-respecting man or woman would want to marry a woman who has already been disloyal to him or her. Once again, you are correct there. There is nothing more I can say really.
Ok, again, I agree for the most part, but if the woman knew her health might endanger her if she became pregnant, the logical choice is to not have sex, and not take on the possibility of it occurring. For example, yes, I am not interested in sex in the slightest, but I also do not think this tiny body, with its conditions, could cope with pregnancy. I fear for a repeat of my own turbulent birth and aftermath and my mother was perfectly healthy. It is not the man’s fault. It is the woman who let him inside her without ‘protection’ (that is another thing that sickens me, that we must ‘protect’ from, or that sex is ‘safe’ when the natural occurrence, which I know does not happen every time, is being activity prevented). Or it is both. However, if a woman is willing to have a man thrust inside her, then she is perfectly capable of handling pregnancy, which does not involve one being as vulnerable, as open and exposed. However, I am glad that you agree men should have as much say. However, those people that call that tiny life a ‘clump of cells’ a ‘parasite’ (even though the definition of parasite states that it is a being of another species and technically, we are all parasites, as we require other living things for substance), a ‘mistake’. That is the biggest form of hypocrisy one can do. We were all those ‘clumps of cells’ once. Sperm and eggs are living things, cells are living things, so foetuses are living things. It makes simply existing a punishable offence, just because it is ‘inconvenient’. It insults that person, their mother, their father, and the whole of humanity. And what does it say about the ‘kept’ children? I’m sure they will enjoy the lovely story of how they selfishly murdered their older brother(s)/sister(s). If a person falls for someone’s ‘ploy’ for sex, they have no reason to complain, for they were stupid enough to fall for it. It is not ‘victim-blaming’ it is called taking responsibility, and a little intelligence. And if they were a (heterosexual female) non-virgin before it happened, that becomes even less, as she is already been penetrated, so another penis or object makes no difference. As for respect, again, indeed. I am a very cynical person, but I still believe in the goodness and decency of people. I’ve seen and read the wonderful things we can do, and I’m certain, I hope, that is greater than the horrid things we do. Sadly, such attitudes as racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc will never cease, as there will always be one intolerant who will past it down to either their children or someone else’s, and those children will continue the chain. However, we can still reduce it as much as possible, as well, our world has changed so much.
"The attitude of virginity to marriage is understandable too, for the reasons I have previously mentioned, and that no self-respecting man or woman would want to marry a woman who has already been disloyal to him or her".
If no self-respecting men and women should marry a non-virgin woman, then I guess you will not have any problems when it comes for self-respecting women to not marry non-virgin men, right?
The concept of virginity is as fictitious as Aesop fables, society constructed this idea in order to limit women's choices and liberties, whereas men did not have such a value and could do whatever they wanted sexually. I know there are physical comparisons when it comes to virginity, such as the penetration of the Hymen. But since when a membrane became the epicenter for a moral-ethical issue that endured for so many centuries? why did we put so much importance on something so common when it comes to define the "sexual Validity" of women.
I am sure you will not agree with this idea, and I respect if some women wish to be virgins until marriage, but it will be unethical of me to support a system where inequalities get in the way. Either both men and women stay "pure" before marriage, or none
the next excerpt
"If a person falls for someone’s ‘ploy’ for sex, they have no reason to complain, for they were stupid enough to fall for it. It is not ‘victim-blaming’ it is called taking responsibility, and a little intelligence. And if they were a (heterosexual female) non-virgin before it happened, that becomes even less, as she is already been penetrated, so another penis or object makes no difference".
My dear, rape is rape, there is no excuse or justification for it. Again coming with the issue of virginity, if a "non-virgin" woman was raped, are you suggesting it does not matter? That not only goes against gender equality, that goes against the most basic forms of human rights. Nothing justifies rape, nothing. We need to wake up as a society to understand better the situation, support the victims (whether male or female) and punish the perpetrators (either male or female). I am not talking about feminism, I am talking about basic social justice.
Also I see you are phallocentric in your principles when you describe sexuality, the penetrator-penetrated divide. I am a person who believes that both men and women have wonderful sexualities, none is better that the other. Such a divide does not even go with natural laws. It is proven that many female animals, such as chimps and wolves (my favorite animals) are promiscuous and even practice homosexual relationships. However they end up giving birth to the next generations as both males and females are adapted by evolution to do so. We humans, we set ourselves free from natural social laws since we came down from the branches. Our sexual nature is more evolved and developed than the rest of the animal kingdom combined. why limit our sexual nature to the Penetrator-Penetrated divide?
Women and men are different in their physical sex, but both want to feel their sexualities in ways not limited to its reproductive and limited role. Having a sense of our sexuality is a human right, part of our human nature
Sta.sh
Before I go into my opinion (it will be long, as most of my explanations) on this, while I will never change it, and do not care how ‘controversial’ it is, I understand I cannot, and therefore, will not, stop others from engaging in the aforementioned acts/using the following products. You are entitled to do so, after all, with Free Will, but that does not mean I must weakly submit to it, and believe and support it.
Sexual intercourse is the biological process of creating a new life. It is not some sick act of ‘pleasure’. The process which take place within it – the man producing semen and sperm, the women’s contractions – are all the evidence needed to show this undeniable truth.
Sex is only natural when used for the natural, REPRODUCTIVE purpose. It is NOT, not matter how many fools say it, when contraception is used and it is about pleasure alone. The ONLY reason the 'pleasure' exists is make the process of child-making not entirely uncomfortable, especially for women. It is there to encourage reproduction.
I have known this for a very long time. Before anyone starts their assumptions, I was not taught this, not by my mother, priests, nuns and Chapel, etc. I came to this conclusion entirely on my own. I know about reproduction from a very young age (six) as I asked the "Where do babies come from?" question. Mum bought me a book, which, for something for children, still went into the detail about the sexual process, reproductive organs and childbirth. This began my view. My view was cemented when I had reproduction classes in Biology in Secondary School. I never let my religion dictate my views.
In my opinion, if you have sexual intercourse for pure pleasure instead of its natural reproductive purpose, French-kiss, give hand/oral sex to a man, touch a penis, or masturbate, while un-married or female, you are a weak, immature, slut/whore/skank/living sex doll with no self-respect, dignity or honour. It shows that you have no control over yourself or your body. It shows you are a self-oppressor, who could not be any LESS ‘sexuality liberated’, and cannot be disgusted by anything sexual, or claim superiority, lest you are a hypocrite.
In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut, especially if the person feeling it is female. Before anyone accuses me of ‘sexism’, ‘misogyny’ or ‘Double Standards’, I do not WANT to dislike women doing it more, I cannot help it, due to the way heterosexual intercourse naturally works – men are the penetrators who obtain bodily ownership, women the penetrated, who give up bodily ownership; which is also the non-sexist reason the double standard exists. Real, strong, intelligent women would never desire and enjoy such a thing – a man dominating, defiling and invading them with his ugly, filthy, disgusting penis (no offence to men) for his own selfish pleasure.
Most animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, and even if it is for sick pleasure, they do not try to stop the good, natural outcome (pregnancy) so humans should as well.
Speaking of reproduction, it is disgusting that, nowadays, pregnancy, the whole point of intercourse, is considered a ‘risk’ of said action and is treating like another STD. It is seen as a BAD thing if a woman is pregnant. Oh yes, because bringing a new life into the world is such a horrible, bad thing. We have lost all respect for it. Pregnancy is a miracle of life and should always be treated as such (though I am not saying rape is acceptable thought this).
While I understand contraception can stop STDs, I am still against it, as, if people understood sex and did not want diseases or pregnancy; they would not have had sexual intercourse.
On this subject, I must say this: abortion is selfish. There is no other reason for it than selfishness, and it makes even EXISTING punishable. Excluding rape, it is the mother and father's fault for being as slutty and perverted as to engage in sex for pleasure. If one does decide to do this, and the woman becomes pregnant, they have no right to complain and then proceed to murder the child with an abortion (yes, a foetus IS alive, as cells are living things. Even the tiny amebae is a living thing), just so they (or she) can escape having to raise her own child. They should have to live with the consequences of their lust and lack of self-control. I LOATHE the term ‘unwanted/unplanned/accidental pregnancy’ as that is impossible. How dare people call a wonderful new life an ‘accident’, a ‘parasite’ or a ‘mistake’.
No sex means no babies, and therefore no overpopulation. Not to mention, anyone who supports abortion is an innate hypocrite, as we all were foetuses once, and most do not support the Death Penalty, either, further showing hypocrisy (it also makes me laugh when they say it is ‘their’ body, when, by being a non-virgin, they gave up their body to a man).
Just think about it, if no one had sex for pleasure, only for reproduction; there would not really be any need for abortion. The rate of abortion would fall greatly.
We should be focusing on how to make pregnancy as painless and non-dangerous as possible, not how to end it before the baby is even born. We should put money towards SAVING lives, not taking them away.
One final bad thing about sex being made into something for pure pleasure is, as cheapening intercourse, it has led to not being able to have sex actually being considered a medical concern (because the concerns of sluts are SO important compared with real health and medical problems); the invention of disgusting things such as French kissing, pornography, prostitution, promiscuity not being considered disgusting or bad, and sex toys/shops.
Next, I shall speak about slut-shaming. There is NOTHING wrong with it. The clue is in the name – SLUT-shaming. Sluts deserve ridicule for their disgusting behaviour. Saying you cannot be sex-negative or judge someone for CHOOSING to have sex is just as retarded as saying you cannot judge someone for CHOOSING to kill, abuse or rape.
I am so sick of sexist, hypocritical, oppressive, petty Feminazis who oppose a right to an opinion, by opposing perfectly-allowed things such as slut-shaming by claiming such rubbish as it being 'sexist' , 'oppressive', 'misogynistic' or 'trying to control women' (like the SlutWalk, I was so ashamed to be female when I watched one of them, when the hilarious irony is this that THEY are allowing themselves to be controlled, by lust and men); claiming that being rightfully being anti-abortion is 'anti-woman' simply because, in most animal species, it is the females who carries the child. While doing this, they more greatly show their blatant hypocrisy and sexism by saying men, or more importantly, the FATHER has no right to an opinion about the life of HIS OWN CHILD, simply because, again due to simple biology, they do not carry that child within them.
All the while, they ignore REAL world and political issues such as famine, innocents dying in war (as in, non-soldiers), racism (like calling people n*gger or *cl*ink), homophobia (such as calling someone an f*ggot), and discrimination or name-calling for something they cannot control (such as your race or orientation), and female-on-male, female-on-female, male-on-male domestic and physical abuse being dismissed, ridiculed and justified.
It is people like them who are making people feel the negative way they do about feminism, by treating woman as better than men.
As for me, I am proud that my mind is clean, pure and free of sexual attraction/lust, and if anyone is going to call me ‘asexual’, as if it were not normal or good, then fuck off. I have better, more productive, intelligent and interesting things to do in life than waste it on self-oppression (yes, I of course know sexually-active people do other things with their lives, but that does change the fact that they are a non-virgin, and everything they do is only a distraction from that, as far as I am concerned). I would rather lose my life than my virginity, or partake in any sexual activity whatsoever. It is one of the few things about me I feel I can take pride in without feeling like a cocky, over-confident bitch.
Before another set of fools assume this, I am also not abstinent or celibate. They mean that I have lust/sexual attraction, and I am ‘waiting’ for the ‘right person’ or marriage. Even if I do marry, my hymen is remaining intact. I do not CHOOSE not to have some pervert invade and dominate my body and I; I naturally do not do not so, as I am not a slut. What is a choice is have lust, and use contraception, to have recreational sex.
I only have romantic attraction: love. Love and lust are two different things. Sexual intercourse is not love, it is lust.
I am bi-romantic. I do not wish to sleep with either men or women. However, I wonder what it would be like to hold someone’s hand, take a walk with them, go out for a meal for them, or just watch TV with them. Never have I been as low and whorish as to think along the lines of “I wonder what it would be like to sleep with them”.
I do not care if people think I am crazy. It is what I believe, and it has nothing to do with religion, parents, or anyone else other than myself. Besides, not having sex has been shown to lead to a longer life than those who do, according to various scientific studies.
I am a true Feminist woman, and supports equality in all its forms, including negative ways, as, unlike what Feminazies want us to believe, not all women are prefect, faultless saints incapable of any mistakes or crimes, and do not believe that merely calling a woman a name is some terrible ‘sexism’ ‘misogyny’ or any other crap they use to describe it.
Finally, before you assume the false modern definition, prude comes from "prod femmes" in pre-revolutionary France. It means an honourable woman, with high moral standards and respect for her body; someone who does/will not engage in any type of sexual behaviour because it is viewed as wrong, immature, dirty, or disgusting.
A woman who has French-kissed, given a handjob/blowjob, masturbates, or is a non-virgin (even if she did not enjoy it/did it to make a man happy, and masturbation counts as a non-virgin-making act) is NOT, and never can be, a prude, despite what people say, as they have given up their purity.
That is the truth you sexist bitch.
Devious Comments
So because 99% of the world enjoy sex we're "snobbish, selfish, hyppocrital oppressive" and you aren't for hating everyone that's not like you?
How old are you cause I don't think you're very experienced in life.
I am a bit lighter in that, as in, there is nothing wrong with lust, but sexual activities outside of marriage and masturbation is a sign of weakness, and stupidity. That is not to say a woman cannot make that choice. She just needs to understand what equality is, and what freedom of speech is. And learn that policing people's thoughts is the opposite of equality.
No, I don't 'hate' them, because, not being me, you can decide such a thing. I am expressing my right to an opinion ona person's choice just as I, as a human being, am judged for my choices. Except, I don't act like it is some terrible, soul-destroying 'oppression' or '-ism'.
"In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut" -you
Well then all women who aren't asexual are sluts. You're just a stuck up bitch who likes to find ways to feel better then everyone, aren't you?
Wrong again, sweetheart. Married women are often sexual/non-virgins. Lesbians are sexual/non-virgins. Lesbian married women are sexual or non-virgins. These are examples of a sexual woman who is not a slut. Nope, I jsut have my opinion and people don't like that. I am just not part of that common group of people.
How is sexual pleasure weak? Because you've never experienced it or could imagine experienced. I think why you're saying it's "weak" is because it should only be experienced while trying to make children. Well what about homosexuals, huh? Are they weak because relationships should only be between a man and a woman?
No, but a woman who is desperate for that pleasure sleeps around or has to stimulate herself, is weak. When the hell did I imply I was homophobic? I fucking hate homophobes. A same-sex couple, given that they have the same reproductive organs, would a more equal, and far less selfish sex life. Plus, unlike many heterosexual women, they are not pompous about it.
Second, this quote. "if you have sexual intercourse for pure pleasure instead of its natural reproductive purpose, French-kiss, give hand/oral sex to a man, touch a penis, or masturbate, while un-married or female" Uh...what? So, only married gay guys can have sex for pleasure, and do all that other stuff. Got it.
Next...you callin 95% of women "not real women", bruh?
"Most animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, and even if it is for sick pleasure, they do not try to stop the good, natural outcome (pregnancy) so humans should as well." I have a few gripes with this. First, some animals eat their unwanted babies. The only reason they don't try stopping pregnancy is that they do not have the intellect nor the resources to do so. Second, some animals kill their children. Should we, as well? Last, calling pregnancy good is odd, because of the..i don't know...numerous studies showing unhappiness in becoming a parent. Speaking of which, if the mother of an unwanted baby is forced to carry and give birth to it, more often than not, she will be bitter and resentful, especially since her "boyfriend" took off. Which may lead to the kid being beaten, physically, emotionally, and sexually abused. Which is worse, being killed when you're unconscious and unable to feel, or growing up abused, mentally shutting down, hating yourself, and distrusting human beings? I'd have to go with the latter. Also, the definition of "slut" is very loose. What do you mean by it? I looked up the word "slut" on Urban Dictionary and looked at the top 20 definitions, and the most common one was "A woman that sleeps with a multitude of people." Sorry, but the stuff you listed doesn't match up with that.
"As for me, I am proud that my mind is clean, pure and free of sexual attraction/lust" Well aren't you a special snowflake.
"(yes, I of course know sexually-active people do other things with their lives, but that does change the fact that they are a non-virgin, and everything they do is only a distraction from that, as far as I am concerned)" Dafuq? If you eat a lot, is everything else you do a distraction as well?!
"I am a true Feminist woman"
"That is the truth you sexist bitch." Thanks for making narrow-minded assumptions. Good day.
You are obviously abstaining the thing about the bi-romantic shit? Well, fuck you and your opinion, then. You don't actually know the fucking purposes of things about gay rights or shit like this:
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in the United States have evolved over time and vary greatly on a state-by-state basis.
Sexual activity between consenting adults and adolescents of a close age of the same sex has been legal nationwide since 2003, pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas. Age of consent in each state varies from age 16 to 18;[1] some states maintain different ages of consent for males/females or for same-sex/opposite-sex relations.
LGBT rights related laws including family, marriage, and anti-discrimination laws vary by state. Thirty-two states plus Washington, D.C. offer marriage to same-sex couples; these marriages are recognized by the federal government and Missouri, but not by the seventeen other states.[2] Additionally, some states offer civil unions or other types of recognition which offer some of the legal benefits and protections of marriage.
Twenty-one states plus Washington, D.C and Puerto Rico outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation, and eighteen states plus Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico outlaw discrimination based on gender identity or expression.[3] Hate crimes based on sexual orientation or gender identity are also punishable by federal law under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. In 2011 and 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that job discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals classified as a form of sex discrimination and thus violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[4]
Adoption policies in regard to gay and lesbian parents also vary greatly from state to state. Some allow adoption by same-sex couples, while others ban all unmarried couples from adoption.[5]
Civil rights for LGBT people in the United States are advocated by a variety of organizations at all levels and concentrations of political and legal life, including theHuman Rights Campaign,[6] Lambda Legal, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders(GLAD), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
PUBLIC OPINION:
Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States of America A poll reports a significant finding that a majority of that state's population supports same-sex marriage.(95% significant: Result is > 0.653 of the 95% sampling error (> 1.28σ) above 50%.) A poll shows at least a plurality, and possibly a majority, of that state's population supports same-sex marriage. A poll shows a statistical tie between support of and opposition to same-sex marriage.(Statistical tie: Not distinguishable at 95% confidence. Difference between support and opposition is < 0.842 of the 95% sampling error (< 1.65σ).) A poll shows at least a plurality, and possibly a majority, of that state's population opposes same-sex marriage. A poll reports a significant finding that a majority of that state's population opposes same-sex marriage.(95% significant: Result is > 0.653 of the 95% sampling error (> 1.28σ) above 50%. No polling data within the past two years.
When a state is striped with light gray and another color, the color stripe indicates the result of the last poll for that state, in the absence of data within the past two years.A state shown with two colors indicates recent polls with conflicting results.
I think I gave you plenty enough fucking information what contradicts your eye-blinded comment.
Why your opinion is stupid?
Because:
"slut-shaming is okay" Yeeah.. HAH NO.
Slut shaming can go down different paths to the person who is being slut shamed. They could be suicidal, kill themselves, feel like they aren't important. PEOPLE HAVE REASONS TO BE WHO THEY ARE. DEAL WITH THAT BULLSHIT.
"ABORITON IS A BAD THING TO DO11111 IT MURDERS BABIES"
Abortion isn't a bad thing when it comes to rape.
Some parents don't have the MONEY to raise a child.
Please, go to that corner and rethink about what you have done.
And how many YEARS you have spent on that god awful comment of an opinion.
I always feel kind of sorry for people who are SO uptight about EVERYTHING, whether it be because of how they were raised or whatever, that they won't even enjoy lovemaking with their eventual spouse even though it's a gift from God. You seem like a very bitter/repressed/judgmental/unhappy person from that pedastal you have yourself on, and that's quite sad.
Thanks for being this way, now we have something to do with our time, YAY Troll education! I would be so much happier doing something else~ I won't elaborate, but you go get laid honey bunch.
1. The reason why people doesn't always want to keep their foetus is because they aren't mentally ready to take care of their offspring. I'm speaking mostly about teenagers. A child is a huge responsibility, and most teens don't have the maturity nor the time to take care of him/her. The secound reason is having someone in need in your life will private you from many freedoms. Some freedoms that some people want more than a child. The third reason is because of overpopulation. Letting your offspring growing up will just make this problem worse, because you just help the population to becaume too big by adding one person.
2. The reason why animals do not stop the good, natural outcome call ''pregnancy'' its simply because they don't have the technology nor the intelligence to take such descision.
3. It is not always true that men are the dominant one in sexual intercourse. If you're a prostitute that sells her body, then, yes, we can tell that this unknow men (or women) is dominating you... howewer if these two persons are in a couple and, indeed, truly care about each other, they will respect each other the more as possible, wich mean that the women AS WELL that the men mind the emotions and desire of their partner. If one of the two doens't want to do something, the other woun't be like: FUCK YA BITTCH YA MUST OBEY TO MEEEEE!!!!!11!!11!!!! In any case, if the other reacts like this, then it means that the ''victim'' must find another love.
4. Abortion is not selfish in anyway, because the baby is still a foetus when it happen. And foetuses can't think nor beign conscious of what death is.
5. Saying that people shouldn't do something because they will loose their honor from doign is not a valid argument. Why? Because honor is purely a matter of opinion, not a verifiable fact.
6. You are saying that animals are doign it for logical purposes. You are true about his. Howewer, what drives them to do it is their how sexual instinct, wich basically hte sexual attraction animal
7. Aslo this love your talking about came from sexual attraction. I am not talking your love, but the love that these heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals persons are feeling.
8. Lust is the term use to describe someone that have uncontrollable sexual desires, at some point that this person will have sex with anyone at anytime, because s/he is never satisifed. A sane couple won't have any of these behaviors in the partners.
You have the right to think anything you write bellow. You don't like it when people have sex for pleasure? Fine, but at last uses proven facts and the right terms to justify it.
Wouldn't animals eating their own young be the equivalent?
And they still kill them after they were born, so the pregnancy still have occured.
"I have poor eyesight (registered blind), asthma, and Chronic Lung Disease, and multiple allergies, and hygiene/habit OCD, you cow. Again, your lot prove your hypocrites, whinging about me expressing my right to an opinion while insulting me. I know some charities are corrupt, and that there even exists people who pose as members of a charity and then claim the money for themselves. That’s why I choose them carefully. That’s good. A few years ago, I signed up to a program that would sent people to either South America, South Africa or India, to assist in building homes and schools, but you know what? They asked for medical records, and due to what I have (and my age), I was not accepted into the program. Naturally, I was pissed. I tried again last year, and the answer was still no. I’ve now looking to see if there are any in my own country.
I’m not screaming, honey. This is text. Screaming would be implied via all capitals or italics. I am a feminist, as I fight for both men and women.
You keep thinking that, sweetie.
It is not an ‘obsession’ eejit. It is caring for life, it is valuing all life equality. I care because I care about that innocent life being taken away by some selfish bitch. I care as I am planning to adopt, and would happily take that child inside of it being killed. No, I am not. I understand that not everyone wants children. Again, if you did not, you would take part in an activity that can result in pregnancy (it is sickening that wonder that is the creation of a new life, something we all were is called a ‘risk’, ‘parasite’ and whatnot), and if you do get pregnant, you have no right to selfishly and needlessly kill that little life you once were and choose to have."
Dude, one thing is that, if a girl has an abortion because she can't take care of it, why the fuck do you care? I don't see you on fucking TV 'SAVING LIVES' of kids in Africa, helping them understand that mass-murder is NOT OKAY, and feeding them. NO, instead you go on here and say this stupid bullshit, saying that abortion is destroying lives. UM. THERE'S 7 BILLION PEOPLE in the world. Do you know how to count? Nope, obviously not. A billion is probably nothing to you.
And I hate this word, but it's so fucking true:
ʸᵒᵘ ᵃʳᵉ ᵃ ˢᵗᵘᵖᶦᵈ ᶜᵘᶰᵗ⋅ ᵗʰᶦᶰᵏᶦᶰᵍ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ʸᵒᵘ'ʳᵉ ˢᵃᵛᶦᶰᵍ ᶫᶦᵛᵉˢ ᵇʸ ʳᵃᶰᵗᶦᶰᵍ ᵃᵇᵒᵘᵗ ᵗʰᶦˢ⋅ ᴵᶠ ᴵ ᶜᵒᵘᶫᵈᶰ'ᵗ ᵗᵃᵏᵉ ᶜᵃʳᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵃ ᶜʰᶦᶫᵈ, ᴵ'ᵐ ᶰᵒᵗ ᵍᵒᶦᶰᵍ ᵗᵒ ᵖᵘᵗ ᵗʰᵉᵐ ᶦᶰ ᵃ ᶠᵘᶜᵏᶦᶰᵍ ᵃᵈᵒᵖᵗᶦᵒᶰ ˢʰᵉᶫᵗᵉʳ ʷʰᵉᶰ ᵗʰᵉʸ'ʳᵉ ᵇᵒʳᶰ, ᵃᶰᵈ ᵐᵃᵏᵉ ᵗʰᵉᵐ ʰᵃᵛᵉ ᵃ ʰᵒʳʳᶦᵇᶫᵉ ᶠᵘᶜᵏᶦᶰᵍ ᶫᶦᶠᵉ⋅
Anyways, I know yours is a late comment, but go fuck yourself. Please. You are disgusting. You are not a feminist in ANY FORM. Feminists do not shame their own OR the other gender, but they support EQUALITY for both genders.
Don't know what EQUALITY MEANS?
There. I educated you. Good fucking day, asshole.
Heterosexually/dildo non-virgin females are the biggest hypocrite on the planet anyway. They came to feminists, but are slaves to primitive urges and service men, they claim disgust at other people's sexual activities, but touched and let a guy stick his penis inside them/violated themselves. They claim a man 'cheated' on them, when they let another men put his penis inside them, and that man had the kindness to forgive her. And it goes on.
I see you are wrongly informed on the seriousness of the situation when it comes to define sex, gender, and sexuality
Your opinion is archaic and so masochistic (Even my grandma is more progressive), I respect your opinion, but why to be a devil's advicate
I am not a masochist. I do not take pleasure in anyone suffering. I would not give to charity and enjoy helping others if I did not. I would not be polite, were I so. I am perfectly progressive, as you would see if you bothered to read my later comments. I am fighting for men's rights too, like a feminist; I know that, nowadays, men are far more oppressed than women. I am stating biological facts. I formed my view through my education in reproduction classes (we do have ‘sex ed’ over here, we look at intelligently, in the biological manner, though we still learn about STDs, transgenderism and whatnot). I have known about sex and reproduction for fourteen, almost fifteen, years. as I, unlike most ‘feminists’ (once again I must say this), as I do not scream about how supporting abortion is ‘anti-women’ while turning around and saying men, even the fathers, do not deserve opinions on the life of their own child. No one cares about them having mental breakdowns. Everyone only cares about the selfish bitch who decided to get fucked and doesn’t to be responsible for the life she once were. I do not shame men’s sexuality. I do not think a man is ‘objectifying’ women by looking at them sexually, or enjoying porn, or that it is wrong for them to look a woman sexuality when she is wearing clothing meant to display the body in a sexual manner’, while they weakly fawn over men’s muscles and butts. Female who let men fuck them (as in ‘for pleasure’) are not feminists. They can do that all they like, granted, but they are hypocrites and liars to claim they are feminists when they have objectified themselves. They are anything but ‘liberated’. I am truly liberated, as I am free from slavery to lust and letting men rule me. How the hell can a woman be a ‘feminist’ or ‘liberated’ by letting men trust into her most intimate areas, taking her as a receptacle (however, again, unlike most ‘feminists’ I see nothing wrong with a man who does that, or virgin/asexual men).
Saying there is a ‘double standard’ is like saying men having penises and testicles, and women having vaginas and wombs, is ‘sexist’ or a ‘double standard’. Further biology that shows that women are not meant to be promiscuous is that they can only be pregnant by one man at a time. Not to mention, the initiate to seek out a mate with the best genes for their children, hence why most women have a lower sex drive.
Funny, your Grandmother will have most likely been a Second-Wave Feminist, not this bullshit ‘third wave’ (AKA Feminazaism, where all women are perfect angels free of judgement for their choices, or you are a misogynistic pig, but they can say what they like about men).
Finally, I am not playing Devil’s Abdicate. I am simply stating my views as I am free to do in a world of equality.
Let's make an analysis, on the theory that men are more oppressed than women nowadays
Points in your favor are that men receive higher punishments than women for the same crimes and ways they have done them, men have to be within a military selective service system (as in the US) or doing mandatory military service while women do not (With some exceptions like Israel, Brunei, etc.), and when it comes to divorce, the custody of children will go more to women than men.
As a man, I feel that men suffer from socially imposed definitions of masculinity that does not recognize the real and unique nature of male individuals. Stereotypes include for men to be sexually virile, aggressive, overtly-competitive, and tough at the face of life and taking the initiative in many aspects, from politics to the starting of sexual relations
The pitfall of your theory is that women continue to suffer under the clutches of patriarchal values (this is a fact in developing countries), Gender equality is of vital importance for these countries as such archaic ideals of gender are damaging the fair, egalitarian, and stable progress. There are two points for gender equality:
The first is to acknowledge the physical difference women and men have between each other (men have a penis and women have a vagina) as this is a real fact, unless nature surprise us. another physical difference is when we describe strength levels (men being stronger due to their their more developed muscles, women being more flexible due to their more developed ligaments) where both are powerful on their own right, none overpowering the other.
The second is to acknowledge that there are many practices that damage men and women by their society as they define their sexuality and gender roles (men are the perverts and the leaders while women being the virgins and followers). this is where the real problem lies.
Coming back to the issues in developed countries like the UK and US, women's rights have improved, therefore feeling a sense of accomplishment for having a gender-equal society. That is a lie
When it comes to gender ideals, there are still problems. Men are still socially-required to be tough and virile while women to be kind and protective to their sexual integrity. in the case of gender roles, women are still expected to take care of the home and be in charge of the well-being of her family while men are the ones who have to provide to demonstrate their masculinity. that is not fair for any of them. the women cannot be a professional and an individual if she is given the house chores monopoly. For men, the disadvantage is to not be part of the real development of his family, to be supportive and fair.
I study women who draw women in sensual ways, I am so glad these women are against archaic values that say women are not supposed to like sex or sexual media, or another idea would be to be virgins unlit marriage. these women demonstrate that women can be great admirers of the female sexual form. Based on Nielsen, 1/3 of internet porn watchers are women in the US, is that a bad thing, nope, instead, it is positive as former monolith worlds are becoming more open and more inclusive to new audiences and new actors within them.
Gender equality happens when men and women share the same or al least almost the same responsibilities of the home and their development and action in the workforce. it is true there will never be 50/50 of everything, but aiming for more fairness an integration is key for our social progress.
Now, when it comes to the issue of abortion, I believe the decision must go only with the mother if her health is in jeopardy (due to health conditions, violence, incest, and rape). if none of those problems are present, then the decision is for both as it took two to tango. Now, if the girl is a "Selfish bitch", then the guy is either a victim of violation (they exists) or just a dumbass who did not know how to protect himself if the sex was consensual. there are motherfucking men and women out there as well as male and female victims of their plots, this is due to their failure of learning values, no of the nonsense of religion, but values that teach us how to treat each other fairly and respect each other. As of now, that is not a reality yet, but working for it is worth all the wait it needs.
There are selfish women out there but try to see the whole picture, our generation is in a difficult situation, we need to redefine ourselves from horrible terms such as being Materialistic and narcissistic. we need to recognize that we are a mosaic, oven to change its forms in order to create a better artwork.
You have key points, but look at the whole picture, limited views will make you look bad rather than a person who analyses her world
It is never my fashion to insult people, I am reminding you to look at the whole picture, understand the whole possibilities, and to observe the both sides of the story
Ah, ok.
Ok, that is good to read. I agree with and understand those points. The attitudes in regards to masculinity piss me off as much as what is contained in the next paragraph. My boyfriend suffered that quite a bit recently. You know, the typical ‘tiny penis’, ‘only in it because you want sex’, ‘doormat’, ‘faggot’, ‘bitch’, etc. Not to mention, if a woman (such as myself), like feminine men/can’t stand macho/overly muscular men (mainly because I don’t want it look like he is with because I weakly want ‘protection’ or ‘saving’), she is seen as wanting to walk all over him. If the woman is in charge in the relationship (though I do not believe anyone should be ‘in charge’), he is called ‘whipped’, ‘pussy’ (God, I hate that word, especially when it is aimed at men), and ‘mangina’.
There is also the excuses for female-on-male, male-on-male, and, just to cover all of them, female-on-female abuse and rape. I know it is an in intelligent thing, to use TV Tropes, but there is also The Unfair Sex, Bumbling Dad, the shaming of a Distressed Dude, and a few others I cannot recall. However, that is an area in which women suffer just as much. Men are also ignored in regard to eating disorders and in medical health in general (well, in America, in regards to the latter)
Urgh, not the rubbish ‘Teh patriarchy still exists!” rubbish. However, you are right, as it is a bad hard to repute such eloquent language. However, the only areas I can think of where women are oppressed or discriminated is in male-dominated fields, (though the reserve is true as well, of course, particularly in regards to children and intimate examination, where men are forced to have a chaperone, not when the genders are reversed). Along with this (much as I am anti-war/anti-military) military service, in that women are forced to be in the background, behind a desk, as a medic, or using aircraft or sniper rifles, and are completely disallowed from fighting on the front line, so they are not fighting in the first place.
Even more well-known, there is the countries where they are prohibited from driving, getting an education, or even voting.
Finally, we have the video game industry (though that can be added to the media aspect, and men are just as stereotyped), both within games and in the attitudes and mistreatment of women employed there, along with gamers who happen to be female (I dislike the term ‘girl gamer’).
Hm, I didn’t know about the looser ligaments thing. I can’t even touch my toes standing up. I guess it makes sense, though, when you consider childbirth. However, everyone can train to be stronger or more flexible, remember. I myself wish I had more muscle structure.
Again, very true, very true. I notice it most in the American media. Feminine men don’t get stereotyped as gay or wimpy as much over here. Indeed. That is I believe, regards of the genders of the people in the relationship, things such as child-rearing, housework and cooking should be shared. For example, due to my OCD, I am good at tidying and cleaning, though I do not consider it stereotypical. However, I am, well, useless in the kitchen. I can chop food, but that’s it. Mainly because I find cooking to confusing and stressful (I get too worried about being scalded or it burning). The thing about sexual virility baffles me. So, he hasn’t put his penis in some girl’s vagina? And? So? It is bad not only because it pressures men, but has also caused the attitudes that men cannot be raped, sexually harassed, or assaulted, particularly by a woman. I used to think so too (but not because of the ‘men always want sex’ thing, but rather, again, because of the biology difference between men and women), until I just realised, frankly out of nowhere, how anti-Feminist that was. It is because of my father’s treatment of my mother that I fight for male victims of abuse as well, as I said to myself “Well, what if it was your mum who was doing that? Would you say your dad deserved it?”. However, I do not tend to say this, as people tend assume, and refuse to believe otherwise, that that is where I obtained my attitudes in regards to sex. It is either that, or religion, or me being molested/raped, when nothing of the sort has happened (to think so is insulting to real victims of these heinous acts).
It is also, like other things, the opposite to the ancient past. Men who slept around or had too much sex were seen as insulting their virility, particularly in Greece, and it was thought that woman could not say no to sex.
There is nothing wrong with that attitude in regard to female sexuality however (well, female heterosexuality). A woman is ‘interested in sex’ with a man wants nothing more than to be dominated, again, due to the simple biology of it and the penetrator-penetrated relationship. The attitude of virginity to marriage is understandable too, for the reasons I have previously mentioned, and that no self-respecting man or woman would want to marry a woman who has already been disloyal to him or her.
Once again, you are correct there. There is nothing more I can say really.
Ok, again, I agree for the most part, but if the woman knew her health might endanger her if she became pregnant, the logical choice is to not have sex, and not take on the possibility of it occurring. For example, yes, I am not interested in sex in the slightest, but I also do not think this tiny body, with its conditions, could cope with pregnancy. I fear for a repeat of my own turbulent birth and aftermath and my mother was perfectly healthy.
It is not the man’s fault. It is the woman who let him inside her without ‘protection’ (that is another thing that sickens me, that we must ‘protect’ from, or that sex is ‘safe’ when the natural occurrence, which I know does not happen every time, is being activity prevented). Or it is both. However, if a woman is willing to have a man thrust inside her, then she is perfectly capable of handling pregnancy, which does not involve one being as vulnerable, as open and exposed.
However, I am glad that you agree men should have as much say. However, those people that call that tiny life a ‘clump of cells’ a ‘parasite’ (even though the definition of parasite states that it is a being of another species and technically, we are all parasites, as we require other living things for substance), a ‘mistake’. That is the biggest form of hypocrisy one can do. We were all those ‘clumps of cells’ once. Sperm and eggs are living things, cells are living things, so foetuses are living things. It makes simply existing a punishable offence, just because it is ‘inconvenient’. It insults that person, their mother, their father, and the whole of humanity. And what does it say about the ‘kept’ children? I’m sure they will enjoy the lovely story of how they selfishly murdered their older brother(s)/sister(s).
If a person falls for someone’s ‘ploy’ for sex, they have no reason to complain, for they were stupid enough to fall for it. It is not ‘victim-blaming’ it is called taking responsibility, and a little intelligence. And if they were a (heterosexual female) non-virgin before it happened, that becomes even less, as she is already been penetrated, so another penis or object makes no difference.
As for respect, again, indeed. I am a very cynical person, but I still believe in the goodness and decency of people. I’ve seen and read the wonderful things we can do, and I’m certain, I hope, that is greater than the horrid things we do. Sadly, such attitudes as racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc will never cease, as there will always be one intolerant who will past it down to either their children or someone else’s, and those children will continue the chain. However, we can still reduce it as much as possible, as well, our world has changed so much.
I shall do my best then, um…good sir?
I find quite interesting your following excerpts:
"The attitude of virginity to marriage is understandable too, for the reasons I have previously mentioned, and that no self-respecting man or woman would want to marry a woman who has already been disloyal to him or her".
If no self-respecting men and women should marry a non-virgin woman, then I guess you will not have any problems when it comes for self-respecting women to not marry non-virgin men, right?
The concept of virginity is as fictitious as Aesop fables, society constructed this idea in order to limit women's choices and liberties, whereas men did not have such a value and could do whatever they wanted sexually. I know there are physical comparisons when it comes to virginity, such as the penetration of the Hymen. But since when a membrane became the epicenter for a moral-ethical issue that endured for so many centuries? why did we put so much importance on something so common when it comes to define the "sexual Validity" of women.
I am sure you will not agree with this idea, and I respect if some women wish to be virgins until marriage, but it will be unethical of me to support a system where inequalities get in the way. Either both men and women stay "pure" before marriage, or none
the next excerpt
"If a person falls for someone’s ‘ploy’ for sex, they have no reason to complain, for they were stupid enough to fall for it. It is not ‘victim-blaming’ it is called taking responsibility, and a little intelligence. And if they were a (heterosexual female) non-virgin before it happened, that becomes even less, as she is already been penetrated, so another penis or object makes no difference".
My dear, rape is rape, there is no excuse or justification for it. Again coming with the issue of virginity, if a "non-virgin" woman was raped, are you suggesting it does not matter? That not only goes against gender equality, that goes against the most basic forms of human rights. Nothing justifies rape, nothing. We need to wake up as a society to understand better the situation, support the victims (whether male or female) and punish the perpetrators (either male or female). I am not talking about feminism, I am talking about basic social justice.
Also I see you are phallocentric in your principles when you describe sexuality, the penetrator-penetrated divide. I am a person who believes that both men and women have wonderful sexualities, none is better that the other. Such a divide does not even go with natural laws. It is proven that many female animals, such as chimps and wolves (my favorite animals) are promiscuous and even practice homosexual relationships. However they end up giving birth to the next generations as both males and females are adapted by evolution to do so.
We humans, we set ourselves free from natural social laws since we came down from the branches. Our sexual nature is more evolved and developed than the rest of the animal kingdom combined. why limit our sexual nature to the Penetrator-Penetrated divide?
Women and men are different in their physical sex, but both want to feel their sexualities in ways not limited to its reproductive and limited role. Having a sense of our sexuality is a human right, part of our human nature