You listen to me right now you oversensitive expat. You are a middle-class/upper-class light-skinned/White (take your pick) Venezuelan who is only upset that Chavez got re-elected because you have a hard on for another light-skinned Venezuelan known as Capriles.
You know proof of improvements? Here's your proof. Read it and weep.
You know proof of improvements? Here's your proof. Read it and weep.
Recent proof is NOT better. Whoever told that to you is lying to you.
Also, Francisco Toro, the author of one of the articles he wrote (which you linked to) is not a reliable source, because he admitted to being blatantly biased.
Also, being tan still means you're light-skinned in comparison to being dark-skinned. You may have never been upper class but the question is, have you ever experienced poverty?
Also, Francisco Toro, the author of one of the articles he wrote (which you linked to) is not a reliable source, because he admitted to being blatantly biased.
Also, being tan still means you're light-skinned in comparison to being dark-skinned. You may have never been upper class but the question is, have you ever experienced poverty?
not exact poverty, but my family did struggle. and i'm not basing things off US media, i'm taking my family's(who still live there) word. and if he's not such a good president anymore, why keep him?
and in my years i did live in VZ as a child, i did see plenty of poverty. thank god i never experienced it.
and in my years i did live in VZ as a child, i did see plenty of poverty. thank god i never experienced it.
He is a good president to those who are in poverty because he helps those people.
Those people are not in poverty because of Chavez. They have been living in poverty before 1998 and their children have to deal with it.
Those people are not in poverty because of Chavez. They have been living in poverty before 1998 and their children have to deal with it.