blackstrike's avatar
So, you prefer small groups of well armed, independent people? Jeez, what could go wrong? I mean, it's not like human beings are greedy, egoistical, fear-mongering, arrogant, selfish and occasionally, stupid. 

and I'll agree with you on one thing - big companies SHOULDN'T have automatics. Those should be reserved solely for army/police. As far as I'm concerned, law should state that anyone caught possession one should be immediately sentenced to several years in prison with hard work included. Just level the playground, you know?

Average human doesn't need anything more than semi-automatic gun or hunting rifle. It's not like most of us still goes to forest to hunt for a meal, McCrap and Bloat King already took care of that. 

What makes you a sheep is that you believe that humans are responsible. You believe that all humans have the restraint not to abuse that kind of power that comes with possessing a weapon of mass murder. Yeah, we saw how that works in USA - every weak ther's a mass shooting somewhere. Good job. Give 'em more ammo and better guns and problem should solve itself! Real fuckin' genius.
joshuarmour15's avatar

I support the division of the population of America into small, manageable units that govern themselves.  Each one would contribute to our national defense should the need arise (invasion, the government trying to seize power (We've never seen that happen.  Especially in Germany.) riots, etc) just as it was done in when my country was founded.  The military is divided in that form.  Anyone who owns a weapon for any purpose than personal defense would be ingrained into the military system, so if he has the money to do so, he can buy a tank and it could be used to help quell a riot in, say, Montana.  The neighborhoods would have their own militia, funded by the neighborhood as they see fit, for the purpose of defending the neighborhood.  Weapons would be bought by families to defend the families.  Each city would have its own military leaders and funding.  They would be part of counties with the same thing.  This would continue up to the national level where the leader of these militias would be the commander in chief.  The president SHOULD BE our commander in chief.

 

You honestly think the police should be trusted above citizens?  Either you don't live in a police state or you support their brutality.

 

Average humans don't need a baseball bat, the most used weapon in assault or a car, which leads to far more deaths than guns.

 

So I am a sheep because I don't agree with your viewpoint.  I am a sheep for believing that the majority of people are responsible for their own actions and that those who use their free agency wrong should be forced to pay the consequences by losing what they have taken or paying back the one that they harmed.  (murder? lose life.  Steal? pay back double what you would have taken.  Rape?  Well, that just isn't something that should be discussed in an open chat like this.)

And where do mass shootings happen?  Gun free zones.  Oh, so gun free zones lead to mass shootings?  Let's make it harder for the law abiding citizens to get them.  Yeah, "Real fuckin' genius."  By the way, using said language makes you look less intelligent.  By insulting me, you lost respect.  By cussing at me, you have lost any credibility I previously had credited you.

 

Mass shootings are on the decline, not rise.  Police often turn a single murder into a mass shooting.

blackstrike's avatar
You support separation of your country in smaller enclaves? How stupid are you anyway? You people had a civil war so you can unite and even now you butthurt southern idiots that lost the war still talk about separation and division?

You and your ilk still live in 1700's. Try to grow a pair and become a human being of 21st century, please. This isn't "every cave for themselves" anymore, Mr. Caveman. If you had ounce of gray matter in your head, you'd fight for unity in your country where everyone helps each other to live a better life. Instead, you'd rather introduce more borders between humans?

I admit, you're not a sheep. They're far smarter than you and your kind, bub. Get back in your compound and clutch your rifle tight, bub. Big, bad, government is out there and they're coming for you! :D

And by the way, what you propose isn't a police run state, it is MILITARY DICTATORSHIP, similar to ones that were in Lybia and Iraq, for example. You know, those guys you Yanks wanted so desperately to take off the throne - Saddam Hussein and Muammar Ghaddafi?
joshuarmour15's avatar

You are stupid.  You are honestly the dumbest person I have ever met.  The country WOULD BE UNITED, YOU IDIOT!  DOMESTIC DEFENSE IS HANDLED LOCALLY!  ARE YOU TRULY DUMB ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THAT I WANT TO DIVIDE THE COUNTRY INTO SMALLER PIECES!?!?!?!  THE MILITARY IS ALREADY DIVIDED INTO SMALL, MANAGABLE UNITS!  I AM SAYING ALLOW PEOPLE TO FUND THE DEFENSE OF THEIR CITY WITH THE MONEY THEY WANT TO USE, AS IS DECIDED IN A REPUBLIC SYSTEM!

 

"You and your ilk still live in the 1700s" because human nature NEVER CHANGES!  OF COURSE IT ISN'T EVERY CAVE MAN FOR HIMSELF!  I AM TALKING ABOUT A SYSTEM IN ........  Oh, wait.  A troll.  No, a rock.  A rock so dumb that the rocks are sad at the very idea of being part of the same reality as you.  I am disgusted by your ignorance and you insistence in ignoring reality.  Anyone with anything close to a semblance of the intelligence found in steel would realize that each state controlling it's own domestic defense instead of relying on foreign aid is better than what YOU plan, which is to pull your pants down below your knees and take it up the tailpipe.

I'm done talking to you.  You are too stupid to be reasoned with.

blackstrike's avatar
Here's a history lesson - Yugoslavia. Research and see what happened there, dumbass. Maybe you learn something new about human nature, although I doubt it.
joshuarmour15's avatar
Thank you for commenting back as the slavish dog you are, because now you can be properly banned.