Dude, it's my first try. Barebone script. My fault in not realizing that with editing software you can do something like this in bursts, and now a whole sitting. I'm not even gonna excuse myself.
Don't like, don't listen, there's other people who'll gonna do it, thats all I can say. I posted this to get critique as in what I should change, how can one avoid choppiness and so on, not as in "you got no soul".
Oh-kay, I don't get why you react so, I listened through your cast and find it lacking in terms of delivery. I can't criticise the technical details, but I can criticise your presentation skills since they are a point of my studies to become a teacher. You need to invest yourself in what you talk about else people lose interest - what do you think why social justice spokeswomyn bitches get so much intention when they're up and about against slut-shaming? Because it sounds like they genuinely care about their stupid shit. If you yourself don't sound convinced in what you talk about, how will you convince anyone else? You don't become a Fuhrer by sounding like a limpwristed ambiguous faggot who has zero firmness in his nether regions - there has to be determination else you are unconvincing. Oratory skills require a great part of acting.
All this would have been so much better if you tried to pretend that you're arguing with us instead of just declaring your points like they were a part of meteorological forecast. You have to stir shit up to get a reaction from the listener else you're losing him in the attempt to inform him. The way it is, you will hold the attention only of those who already agree with you and/or care about you as a person - and that's not good in terms of propaganda.
No. Because "no soul" is what pretentions hitpsterfags with zero talents say when they lack the vocabulary to properly describe what they find to be lacking in whatever is the subject they're discussing.
Dude, tone down the "me" part. I was saying generally about people who say shit like this.
No, its not anyones fault, "having/not having a soul" had always been a pretentious way to avoid actual critique or praise. Because its so abstract and ephemeric.
Sorry, touchy about hipster thing because of the glasses stigma.
When you say that something has no soul, it means that it's not emotionally charged, that it was just produced. You simply see that something was done for money based on how uninspired it looks or sounds. Look at all GW codex art - with some artists, all their paintings look the same with SPEHSS MAHREENS facing foes with some odd war-face expression that is recycled over and over from artwork to artwork (thus emphasising the WORK part and not the ART one).
I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. But we're straying far off-topic.
I'd also recommend that you try as to the point as possible. When someone knows that twenty minutes need to be spent, that person is likely to be a bit squeamish about dedicating "so much" time for a single thing on the Internet, especially a serious one. For the next one, try to at least cut it down to fifteen. Then even a child can muster the focus for listening - frankly, the younger they are, the greater likeliness that you will plant a seed in their minds. As others bombard them with crap since birth, you may as well do the same.
Sta.sh
Don't like, don't listen, there's other people who'll gonna do it, thats all I can say. I posted this to get critique as in what I should change, how can one avoid choppiness and so on, not as in "you got no soul".
Devious Comments
All this would have been so much better if you tried to pretend that you're arguing with us instead of just declaring your points like they were a part of meteorological forecast. You have to stir shit up to get a reaction from the listener else you're losing him in the attempt to inform him. The way it is, you will hold the attention only of those who already agree with you and/or care about you as a person - and that's not good in terms of propaganda.
And since when the fuck do you deem me a hipster?
No, its not anyones fault, "having/not having a soul" had always been a pretentious way to avoid actual critique or praise. Because its so abstract and ephemeric.
When you say that something has no soul, it means that it's not emotionally charged, that it was just produced. You simply see that something was done for money based on how uninspired it looks or sounds. Look at all GW codex art - with some artists, all their paintings look the same with SPEHSS MAHREENS facing foes with some odd war-face expression that is recycled over and over from artwork to artwork (thus emphasising the WORK part and not the ART one).
I'd also recommend that you try as to the point as possible. When someone knows that twenty minutes need to be spent, that person is likely to be a bit squeamish about dedicating "so much" time for a single thing on the Internet, especially a serious one. For the next one, try to at least cut it down to fifteen. Then even a child can muster the focus for listening - frankly, the younger they are, the greater likeliness that you will plant a seed in their minds. As others bombard them with crap since birth, you may as well do the same.