Comment on One with nature by TheGhostSiren
Physical attractiveness has been studied extensively in both evolutionary psychology and evolutionary biology.
People are attracted to healthy genetically fit people, so when we want to appear more attractive we cover up signs of unhealthiness and poor genetics. That is the science behind the make-up in the photo.
What we find attractive is for the most part purely biological, personal preference doesn't play a large role.
I think stupid women are more attractive because they're cheap and easy. Is this evolutionary?
That depends, would you want to spend the rest of your life with a stupid woman?
No, I don't think this is a trait studied in evolutionary biology or evolutionary psychology.
The only way to look at it is from a social or cultural viewpoint.
It makes logical sense for a male looking for a one-night stand to select a stupid/cheap/easy woman, because it is more likely that she'll agree to sex.
homepage.psy.utexas.edu/HomePa… is a study that concluded that some men are more sensitive to the cues stupid/easy/cheap women give them.
But things are a bit different for males looking for a long time mate, and even if he still chooses the cheap/stupid/easy woman it is out of different considerations.
Some men don't like to be with intelligent/succesfull/high earning women when it comes to long-time relationships, this preference is seen in insecure men.
Whilst men who are secure don't have problems with dating or marrying intelligent/succesfull/high earning women.
Stupidity doesn't make someone easy or cheap, stupidity is just low intelligence, which doesn't make a person bad or unlikable, you can get by in life and be happy with a low intelligence. Also I don't believe in conventional marriage in its current state so don't go slinging your fancy words bro.
You said yourself that "I think stupid women are more attractive because they're cheap and easy", and now you contradict yourself by saying that "Stupidity doesn't make someone easy or cheap ".
Are there two people that both react to these posts under the same username but have opposite opinions?
I've never expressed my own views towards "stupid" or low-intelligence women, so I don't see why you have to point out that "Stupidity doesn't make someone easy or cheap, stupidity is just low intelligence, which doesn't make a person bad or unlikable, you can get by in life and be happy with a low intelligence.".
You started with the "stupid/cheap/easy" line and I simply referenced you with a study that uses those same terms in the same situation, you see how I got there? I have never made any personal judgements towards stupid women in this conversation.
Which fancy words are you referring to and why shouldn't I be slinging them, even in the knowledge that you don't believe in conventional marriage in its current state?
Marriage was not the only long term relationship I mentioned, I mentioned the terms "spend the rest of your life with" "long time mate" "long time relationship" and "dating" which can also be done untill death do you part.
Your personal view on conventional marriage in its current state does not make my point moot, nor does it make those studies go away.
I think you need to get a sense of humor. Walmart carries some.
I think I see a case of "Can't carry an argument, suggests conversation partner to get a sense of humor".
You are awfully preachy and confusing for someone who indirectly suggests that they themselves have a sense of humor.
If you really want to make me giggle or laugh, you should come up with something a lot more witty and smart.
Now, if walmart really carried a sense of humor I would still not be willing to jump on a plane from the netherlands to america.
Even the germans can do better, and you know what their sense of humor is allegedly like.
You're a tight butt, im making fun of you and when you realize it you get even angrier and hostile. Can't argue against a troll.
View all replies