Ah ok. But no, those errors were crucial words that could change your meaning entirely, and they were so random I couldn't just correct the spelling.
"I was just saying that he first flashback had its purpose and wasn't just padding." Ok. Care to explain?
You still haven't defined to me how it was apt for an ideal. Maybe you think it was well paced or with good pacing? That would make more sense. Again, would you care to explain how it felt those things you describe.
*"To answer another..." *"might not be ..." *"be a point.." *"would not need..." *"to be true and"
Actually no that part isn't obvious. There's a lot of guesses and assumptions you are making there. I guess if we say the tree works like a magic capacitor it could work. But I don't think they tell us enough, which is why it's an issue in the first place.