Yukari-Nao's avatar
i understand. basically my opinion of these things follows the same rules: anyone can do anything they want as long as it doesn't infringe upon someone else's rights. and i see this as infringing on my right not to look at a woman without bottoms on. i don't know if that opinion makes me a naked hater, but if i am, so be it.

i'm just going to say that if this were my art, i would just leave the doll unclothed. the fact that she has some kind of top/bikini or whatever but no bottoms of any kind bothers me. but as i said, i don't care what they do or draw, that's their business, i just wish they would mark it, so no one that finds this disturbing or scarring has to see it.

i've seen some very disturbing things in google images, but never of the chipmunks. the reason for that is probably that i stopped using google images the day i stumbled upon- well actually i'm not going to share exactly what it was, but it was a character from my childhood and it was scarring.

by the way, you are fun to debate with. if you haven't studied debate in some way, you are a natural.
Thank you for the compliment.  The secret's in the respect, I think.  Well-formed opinions, when incorrect, deserve intelligent replies.  As for random imagery on Google... I've found some very entertaining things on Google.  I've found some terrible things.  But I've never once clicked "I'm feeling lucky," and I never plan  to.

However, I do believe we clutter Deino's page, so I think it best we leave it here.  It was good talking - you do think things through quite well.  I disagree with you, but that doesn't change the fact.