Egek's avatar
Yes, me too. Individual/collective sounds better.
Once I played with a paladin according to D&D rules and after a few hours DM left the game! He said I cannot be a paladin with walking over dead bodies and injured villagers.

X-box? Cool! My brother has playstation 2, however I am not so good at playing games on these machines. I find PC better.
mindflenzing's avatar
I generally ran Neutral/Good characters. As long as you didn't do evil stuff your GM rarely got on your tail about your alignment. Some day, though, I'd love to try running a Lawful/Neutral(or evil) Nihilistic Paladin. He believes in an ordered society and justice but he also believes that life is suffering and that death is often the best solution to social problems. I'd love to see a group react to a character which is somewhat evil while being civic and well behaved. Our paladin got in trouble for murdering unarmed orcish women and children, abandoning his allies because he didn't want to wade through a sewer, and wussing out in front of a high priest of his deity. He got two warnings and an extra sidequest to "redeem himself" which just netted him extra XP and loot. We all hated the paladin.

They did release KoTOR for Mac and PC (PC being much cheaper, which is why I got a better deal buying an X-Box to play it on).
Egek's avatar
Wow.. That paladin is really bad guy.
I played with a classic paladin and DM selected me as the worst paladin in the history.
mindflenzing's avatar
I've never really met a paladin I didn't dislike. I use the term as a slur now. I really see no good in them as a group.
Egek's avatar