Subscribe Now
Buy deviantWEAR
Advertise Here
[x]
All Deviations
All Deviations

Comment on The Beast Redux. by ~the-hami[top] [parent]

~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: May 1, 2008, 8:41:43 AM
... interesting interpretation. But really, I think you may be overthinking it. But hell, I've been known to be wrong. *shrug*

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity

Devious Comments

~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: Apr 30, 2008, 12:09:42 PM
... Whoa... if you scroll up and down a little, the background seems to 'squirm'. That's the closest I can come to describe it.
Interesting character design by the way. When I saw the thumb, I thought it might be the Cloverfield monster. Silly me.

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity
~the-hami:iconthe-hami: Apr 30, 2008, 1:05:56 PM
lol thanks.
as for the clover field monster.. i can see what you mean. the colours similar. BUT comeone that monster did nothing but walk around a city and give birth...
~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: Apr 30, 2008, 2:11:03 PM
Actually, those little guys were more like ticks on a large animal. In the special features, they're always referred to as ';parasites'.

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity
~the-hami:iconthe-hami: Apr 30, 2008, 2:57:26 PM
Oooh right. i dont have the dvd i just saw the film. That sounds good though.
Ultimately, I dont think the monster was the main point of the film, I figured it was a giant metaphor for something else but hey what wud i know :p
~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: Apr 30, 2008, 3:39:57 PM
Hehe. In the commentaries, the producer and director pretty much outright say: "This was a monster movie. America needs a monster movie, so we made one." So I doubt the monster was a metaphor. It was a monster. It was pretty cool though.

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity
~the-hami:iconthe-hami: May 1, 2008, 7:58:36 AM
Well.. what does the director know XD. As far as im concerned.. the monsters role was minimal. Godzila.. now that was a monster movie... set in america.. it counts.
What i mean is, you see these charachters at a party, they have troubles then this monster comes to destroy their world. its arguable that the monster was just an imagining of their "world" and life being destroyed by those two people shagging.

Yeah i haven't seen it in a while so thats all i can remember
~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: May 1, 2008, 8:41:43 AM
... interesting interpretation. But really, I think you may be overthinking it. But hell, I've been known to be wrong. *shrug*

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity
~the-hami:iconthe-hami: May 1, 2008, 9:46:19 AM
well if the director said so, the director said so :P.
but still, for a monster film there wasn't that much "monster" in it.
~toasterpip:icontoasterpip: May 1, 2008, 10:25:06 AM
Touché. But hey, it was still a really neat movie.

--
Check out my Webcomic!
My FurAffinity
Previous Page    12    Next Page
Sign up to leave feedback! <3
©2008 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Help & FAQ Advertise | Services Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy