Tanqexe's avatar
Yeah I didn't like the bulkiness of the EX-S and FAZZ. They look like they're overcompensating for something. Now the Z-plus A, B, and C type... mmmmmm.
GreatGodoftheMoon's avatar
I'm with you there, though there's...just something about a part of the FAZZ design that I liked....perhaps if it had been similar in design, only slimmed down...I'm not one for huge guns though.
Tanqexe's avatar
Then it would've been the ZZ Gundam xd
GreatGodoftheMoon's avatar
lol, I was thinking more so of taking some of the design concepts, like the Spray missile packs and the hyper beam swords and slapping them on a smaller one than even the ZZ, but I guess that's what the S-Gundam was :/
Tanqexe's avatar
Yeah that's pretty much the S. Personally it's not a very economical MS and IMO the ZZ lineage (that's including S/EX-S) is fugly and meant more for selling bling models moreso than most of the designs of the day.
GreatGodoftheMoon's avatar
Right, I see what you mean. I'm not a fan of it's ALICE feature, sorta like slapping a God tag on it. I did like the Deep Striker as a support unit but by no means a stand alone MS
Tanqexe's avatar
The entire design of the Deep Striker is one giant sexual innuendo. Add on the fact that ALICE is personified as a young girl.............................
GreatGodoftheMoon's avatar
Ehhhh, I don't seem to understand the innuendo part of the Deep Striker (other than the name).
View all replies