Comment on Contradiction in maturity by DanOstergren
But that's just my point: Just because you don't see women a certain way doesn't change the fact that it is the norm to do so.
And please, darling, don't tell me that gay men can't recognise what is considered sexual in the opposite gender, even if it doesn't give them the tinglies.
"That sexuality in the female breast has been created by social constructs,"
WRONG. Not only is the human female breast inflated in such a way as to make it less easy for a newborn to suckle, simply because the inflation serves as a signal that the woman is young and healthy/well-fed; there are also nerves in the nipples that go straight to the same place in the brain as stimulations of the clitoris does.
Human female breasts are sexual. End of.
"And you can keep trying to get under my skin by calling me pet and a liar, it wont change my opinion on this topic."
Keep trying? Anyway, your little 'darling' isn't any different, now is it?
And please, darling, don't tell me that gay men can't recognise what is considered sexual in the opposite gender, even if it doesn't give them the tinglies.
"That sexuality in the female breast has been created by social constructs,"
WRONG. Not only is the human female breast inflated in such a way as to make it less easy for a newborn to suckle, simply because the inflation serves as a signal that the woman is young and healthy/well-fed; there are also nerves in the nipples that go straight to the same place in the brain as stimulations of the clitoris does.
Human female breasts are sexual. End of.
"And you can keep trying to get under my skin by calling me pet and a liar, it wont change my opinion on this topic."
Keep trying? Anyway, your little 'darling' isn't any different, now is it?
So are men's. I'm not going to stop arguing this with you.
You just said it was a social construct, but now you've flopped completely and are claiming that men's breasts are inflated, and that men have clitorises.
You really should stop arguing with me.
You really should stop arguing with me.
Technically, men do have clitorises. Both the penis and the vagina grows from the same thing.
Growing from the same thing =/= being the same thing. 
No, I never said any of that actually. That was my bad for not being more clear.
To say that people don't have a sexual reaction to a large chest on a man is untrue as well. The fact that men can still walk around with their shirts off and women cannot is sexist.
And I wont stop arguing with you, regardless of how rude or condescending you are to me.
To say that people don't have a sexual reaction to a large chest on a man is untrue as well. The fact that men can still walk around with their shirts off and women cannot is sexist.
And I wont stop arguing with you, regardless of how rude or condescending you are to me.
To me, it's fine art, not something pornographic or inappropriate. To me, the human body does not became something only a mature audience can see until it crosses over that line of being inappropriate or pornographic, or when the breasts or other body parts are being objectified which is not the case with this portrait. I don't believe I have been proven wrong by you, I believe we have different opinions. I'm not wrong, and I'm not saying you are either.
And you being rude and condescending to me does affect me in the way that I respond to your arguments. It makes it difficult to see the point you are making, and more difficult for me to explain my point without being emotionally involved with it.
And you being rude and condescending to me does affect me in the way that I respond to your arguments. It makes it difficult to see the point you are making, and more difficult for me to explain my point without being emotionally involved with it.
It's ok, we all push Post too quickly from time to time.
Anyway:
"To say that people don't have a sexual reaction to a large chest on a man is untrue as well."
Still, a man's chest in itself isn't sexual any more than muscular arms. Remember, your personal tastes do not define what men and women are.
"The fact that men can still walk around with their shirts off and women cannot is sexist."
Sure, it's sexist. But it is still true that a female breast is more sexual than a males.
The fact that I'm rude or whatever, shouldn't afect you. But I'm wondering why you still argue, even though you've been proven wrong.
Anyway:
"To say that people don't have a sexual reaction to a large chest on a man is untrue as well."
Still, a man's chest in itself isn't sexual any more than muscular arms. Remember, your personal tastes do not define what men and women are.
"The fact that men can still walk around with their shirts off and women cannot is sexist."
Sure, it's sexist. But it is still true that a female breast is more sexual than a males.
The fact that I'm rude or whatever, shouldn't afect you. But I'm wondering why you still argue, even though you've been proven wrong.
I take that back actually. You're condescending and rude, so I wont be arguing with you. Bye bye, say whatever you want.