mgonzales041090's avatar
Oh what a stickler you are.
Trorbes's avatar
Excuse me for not drooling over women like pieces of meat.
Jeysie's avatar
Yeah, man, it's not like women drool over men like pieces of meat.

Oh wait, they do. All the time.

But we only get uptight when it's women being drooled over.
Trorbes's avatar
Uh huh. Let me know when nobody takes male politicians seriously unless they're young and attractive.
Jeysie's avatar
one = won. Wow, brain fart.
Jeysie's avatar
You mean like, how, say, one of the reasons Kennedy one was because he was more telegenic than Nixon? Yeah, whew, looks totes had no effect on history there or anything. Or how there's actually quite a few ugly and/or fat male politicians that get jokes made about their looks/weight?

But nah, only wimmin ever get judged on their looks, according to the Feminist View of the World. And so it's only bad when women are acknowledged as actually having looks to care about. Because of course all women should be treated as never being attractive or anything other than plain, cause that's totes sexist to treat women as anything other than plain or sexless.

But of course if we judge men on their looks or make any comment on male attractiveness, that's totes OK and not sexist or anything.
Trorbes's avatar
Actually, instead, let me know when you're ready to stop fighting strawmen and want to have an actual argument.
Jeysie's avatar
Translation: Shit, you made a valid argument full of proof I can't counter with an actual honest rebuttal, so flimsy asscovering lolflounce.
Trorbes's avatar
Quote me where I said -- hell, where I suggested -- any of what you're accusing me of saying.
View all replies
mgonzales041090's avatar
That's why my "you're excused" remark was the win. This really isn't the sort of political discussion one wins or argues. It's just petty.
View all replies
mgonzales041090's avatar