[link] why would a great man with great knowledge and ability just make a tetrahedron shape around the human body? maybe he knows something that you don't? its possible isn't it? why not give leonardo de vinci a chance? you don't have to take it from me just give his work on the flower of life and consciousness and the geometries of the body a chance.
![[link]](https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8smqkPwS71r29n8ho1_500.jpg){kind=link}
Leonardo da Vinci was an atheist.
no he was a free mason
You shouldn't believe everything you see in movies, you know.
i don't watch many movies. or television this is all math that i speak of .
Then you seriously got your facts wrong.
alrighty.
It's just some triangles drawn over the Vitruvian Man. What's so special about that? What are you trying to prove? Besides, Leonardo da Vinci was a brilliant man, but he's not infallible. He grew up in a time when science was just getting started, and it's possible he subscribed to the same sort of meaningless mysticism that you do.
Also, perhaps you wouldn't mind putting all your thoughts into one post?
Also, perhaps you wouldn't mind putting all your thoughts into one post?
wow ... i dont know what to say to you. its obvious isnt it that those triangles meant something? i find it hard to talk to someone like you im sorry you just are so skeptic. i keep my mind 100 % open but not open to your skeptic ideas im sorry .
its obvious isnt it that those triangles meant something?
Obviously it's not obvious, or else I wouldn't bother asking. If it were obvious, everyone would believe in merkabahs and whatever else. You have still failed to explain yourself. I asked you what drawing some triangles over the Vitruvian Man was supposed to prove, and rather than explain, you just stand back and gawp at what a narrow-minded skeptic I am.
Now I'm going to ask you this one more time: what is the significance of the picture? What are you trying to demonstrate?
Obviously it's not obvious, or else I wouldn't bother asking. If it were obvious, everyone would believe in merkabahs and whatever else. You have still failed to explain yourself. I asked you what drawing some triangles over the Vitruvian Man was supposed to prove, and rather than explain, you just stand back and gawp at what a narrow-minded skeptic I am.
Now I'm going to ask you this one more time: what is the significance of the picture? What are you trying to demonstrate?
what does science tell us? i am sorry i am not putting enough effort i am tired right now. but what i know is that science is great and gets you to that last point but then doesn't give you the rest of the answers. we have studied so much stuff so far in the last 300 years or more. but science still doesn't have the answer to life after death and why we exist here on this earth. the answers are most definitely out there but science seems to throw those questions away all the time. except quantum science. but please tell me what you beliefs that science has told you? what do you think about the basic human questions who are we? why are we here? what made us come here? what happens after we die here? these are the most important questions but science just discards them. i stopped with just science when i realized that they are missing something so i went out and learned more about buddhism hinduism meditation astrology astronomy egypt atlantis the precession of the equinox and how the mayan calendar actually worked. There is more to life then what are 5 scenes can hear smell touch taste and see. i think thats at least obvious because we are aware through science that there is many things we cant see like how small an atom is or little tiny waves or vibrations. i am tired of debating like this i want you to answer those questions about who we are with the science that you are so confident with. i honestly can answer some of those questions with the beliefs i have come to believe but
but science still doesn't have the answer to life after death and why we exist here on this earth.
That is the "god of the gaps" fallacy. You think that because science doesn't have the answer to everything, it's acceptable to substitute mythology in the gaps. See, we used to do that with lightning, and disease, and how the sun worked, and science answered all of those in turn. If we don't know the answer, the appropriate stance is, "I don't know; let's keep looking," not just to make up an answer.
who are we? why are we here? what made us come here? what happens after we die here?
We are the species Homo sapiens sapiens, and we are here because hominids millions of years ego began to evolve increasingly high intelligence as a result of environmental pressures. In other words, the only reason we exist is because of the interactions of the physical laws. Do not pretend that we serve some greater purpose: if you see a rock on the side of the road, you would not assume it had a purpose. The human race, the Earth, and universe are just the same. And as for what happens after we die, since science has shown it to be pretty clear that consciousness is a function of the brain, and brain activity ceases upon death, it stands to reason death means the annihilation of the consciousness.
There is more to life then what are 5 scenes can hear smell touch taste and see. i think thats at least obvious because we are aware through science that there is many things we cant see like how small an atom is or little tiny waves or vibrations.
That's true, but the thing about science is that you still can't logically assert the existence of something without some demonstrable evidence. Take dark matter, for example. We can't detect it with any known means, yet we know it's there, because we've calculated that the outer-rim of the galaxy is spinning too fast for material gravity to account for.
That is the "god of the gaps" fallacy. You think that because science doesn't have the answer to everything, it's acceptable to substitute mythology in the gaps. See, we used to do that with lightning, and disease, and how the sun worked, and science answered all of those in turn. If we don't know the answer, the appropriate stance is, "I don't know; let's keep looking," not just to make up an answer.
who are we? why are we here? what made us come here? what happens after we die here?
We are the species Homo sapiens sapiens, and we are here because hominids millions of years ego began to evolve increasingly high intelligence as a result of environmental pressures. In other words, the only reason we exist is because of the interactions of the physical laws. Do not pretend that we serve some greater purpose: if you see a rock on the side of the road, you would not assume it had a purpose. The human race, the Earth, and universe are just the same. And as for what happens after we die, since science has shown it to be pretty clear that consciousness is a function of the brain, and brain activity ceases upon death, it stands to reason death means the annihilation of the consciousness.
There is more to life then what are 5 scenes can hear smell touch taste and see. i think thats at least obvious because we are aware through science that there is many things we cant see like how small an atom is or little tiny waves or vibrations.
That's true, but the thing about science is that you still can't logically assert the existence of something without some demonstrable evidence. Take dark matter, for example. We can't detect it with any known means, yet we know it's there, because we've calculated that the outer-rim of the galaxy is spinning too fast for material gravity to account for.