Comment on Is there objective truth? by nozebo

Strictly speaking, no. The truth of a statement depends on its proof. Proofs are either axiomatic, based in circular logic (truths by definition) or regressive, proofs stacked down ad infinitum. With the axiomatic, our axioms may be wrong, and we could ask for a proof of them, but if we allow that, the proof becomes regressive. With circular logic, the statements which logically be consequences of each other, but might not be true. If we try to prove their truth, the argument becomes regressive. Regressive arguments are ultimately unprovable, as they rely, each one, on a deeper proof, which may not exist.
Pragmatically speaking, it is a fair approximation to say in some areas there is objective truth.