Well, the aim of that journal was just an attempt to expose the fact that the Bilderberg Group actually exist. For some years ago the mere existence was regarded as a conspiracy theory. Today nobody deny their existence. Todays question is mere what they actually are doing, and if you go through the links you see they go to "both side". On the other hand the word "conspiracy" seems to have change it sense a little bit. Even Gerard Battern, who I first linked to, felt it necessary to declare he was not a conspiracy theorist, when he was interviewed during the demonstration outside the meeting in Watford 2013.
NWO has many senses, but regarding the sense of some kind of "World Government", there is at least ONE powerful person that openly advocate such one, Gideon Rachman, a columinist on Financial Times, you may read his 3-sided article from 2008 below (I've witten it out as pdf),
And Now for a World GovernmentSorry, I maybe misinterpreted your reply a little bit, but yet