I already achieved everything I wanted to regarding ED. My points were proven true, and things occurred just as expected. Their little article doesn't bother me in the least, especially when the vast majority of it isn't even correct. Just shows the low-caliber nature of the people I'm dealing with. But then, not really surprising. Also, it's much more common and indeed correct to word comments TO a person rather than ABOUT them when the comment is posted in such a way that it goes directly TO the person mentioned. Just a little etiquette tip you should jot down.
The points about you refusing to draw gay porn for commissions, and then EDF digging up images of your character Teo clearly having sexual relations with another male, and then jumping with the excuse that it was "for a friend" or some other sillyness after being called out, henceforth making yourself out to be even more of a massive hypocrite?
Good job, you'd proven your point.
By the way, saying that Teo is "sixteen, but in that world it means that he's more equivalent of being eighteen" or whatever excuse you made up is even more ludicrous. Especially when both Teo and Kitty are clearly ripoffs of cartoon characters from a pre-10 children's show.
Feel free to hide and block, I'm not intending to reply to whatever ridiculous garbage you feel I should waste time reading. deviantART muro drawing
Nobody dug up anything, they're available on the other site. They're no more hidden than these comments are, ED pats itself on the back a little too much. I need no excuses as I've been truthful about it all. Whatever you think about character ages is irrelevant. They are what I say they are, and this remains objective despite you. I don't plan to hide and block this, as I like my supporters to see the nonsense posted against me and how easily it is dismissed. See you when you reply.
Drama on my page really started when I posted a journal challenging ED to better themselves and show they had the intelligence to properly critique works of mine. This situation held nothing but advantages for me. If they did leave proper critiques and helpful advice, I could take something useful from that for the future. If they did not, as I suspected they wouldn't, my point about them would be proven for many people to see their ignorance and overall stupidity. Secondly those who would respond to my journal insultingly or in demeaning/unhelpful ways could be pasted into two categories: Those who were not intelligent enough to understand how proper critiques are given, and those who were purposely not doing it, I.E. willfully being insulting. There was no escape from a losing position for them, and their internet pride wouldn't allow them to choose the proper course of action anyway. On my end, I've received helpful advice from other normal people, as well as nearly 300 new watchers over the course of a couple months, commission work, exposure, and so on. It's been a clear victory on all ends for me. Trolls don't like being trumped, and the rest has been attempts to attack and harm me in various ways, all of which have predictably failed. The ED article for example has most of it's info wrong, though I'd expect no better, really. Sorry for the long post, just decided to get it all said so I can direct further inquiries to it.
Sta.sh
Their little article doesn't bother me in the least, especially when the vast majority of it isn't even correct. Just shows the low-caliber nature of the people I'm dealing with. But then, not really surprising.
Also, it's much more common and indeed correct to word comments TO a person rather than ABOUT them when the comment is posted in such a way that it goes directly TO the person mentioned. Just a little etiquette tip you should jot down.
Devious Comments
The points about you refusing to draw gay porn for commissions, and then EDF digging up images of your character Teo clearly having sexual relations with another male, and then jumping with the excuse that it was "for a friend" or some other sillyness after being called out, henceforth making yourself out to be even more of a massive hypocrite?
Good job, you'd proven your point.
By the way, saying that Teo is "sixteen, but in that world it means that he's more equivalent of being eighteen" or whatever excuse you made up is even more ludicrous. Especially when both Teo and Kitty are clearly ripoffs of cartoon characters from a pre-10 children's show.
Feel free to hide and block, I'm not intending to reply to whatever ridiculous garbage you feel I should waste time reading.
deviantART muro drawing
I need no excuses as I've been truthful about it all.
Whatever you think about character ages is irrelevant. They are what I say they are, and this remains objective despite you.
I don't plan to hide and block this, as I like my supporters to see the nonsense posted against me and
how easily it is dismissed.
See you when you reply.
And thanks for the tip, I will remember that.
Secondly those who would respond to my journal insultingly or in demeaning/unhelpful ways could be pasted into two categories: Those who were not intelligent enough to understand how proper critiques are given, and those who were purposely not doing it, I.E. willfully being insulting. There was no escape from a losing position for them, and their internet pride wouldn't allow them to choose the proper course of action anyway. On my end, I've received helpful advice from other normal people, as well as nearly 300 new watchers over the course of a couple months, commission work, exposure, and so on. It's been a clear victory on all ends for me.
Trolls don't like being trumped, and the rest has been attempts to attack and harm me in various ways, all of which have predictably failed. The ED article for example has most of it's info wrong, though I'd expect no better, really.
Sorry for the long post, just decided to get it all said so I can direct further inquiries to it.
Thanks for telling me, I heard all I needed to know about this.