I'll look into the book. I like books. I may even have the time to read before long...
I don't have any idea what I'd do for =
Ellygator's contest; I can't settle on one sort of symbolism. Which is precisely why whenever I've had to choose a static identifier for myself it's been something of a cheat - e.g. cwicseolfor, the ever-mutable. I also know precisely what you mean about tattoos; I love them, they're gorgeous, and I'll never have one, precisely because it'd prevent me doing something else later. Henna, however, is a close friend of mine ^-^ It's actually been a real pain not being able to settle on a mark, so I selected the most abstracted of my masks, the one who seems mid-shift, melting and unsettled. I have no ability to commit to anything for more than a day. Caprice doesn't boil down very well.
Yet you're very right - I'm very captivated by identity, and I wonder why. I've never really yearned for it the way American culture dictates young people ought - I always felt rather the opposite, that I had entirely too much identity to go and express it all at once. I also follow you about the glasses conflict; e.g. I really like brilliant colors that I should both NEVER WEAR due to complexion clash and that don't match anything else I own. I have a scarf I bought in China - an extreme, violent red somewhere between arterial blood and alizarin crimson - that I can only wear with black because there's nothing that could stand up to it. I prefer earth tones, things that wouldn't look too jarring in the Texas chaparral-and-cedar woods I spent so much of my childhood in, but the COLOR in this thing's so saturated it's positively trippy to look at. It's not who I am, but someone I certainly wish I could be. As a kid (and often now) I'd wish I had the sort of rich cinnamon skintone a few of my friends had, and the flawlessly straight black hair of the attendant at my nursery, so I could wear the brilliant shades they did. Since my teens, spice vermilion and gold has always been a very dangerous combination. Even if it didn't make me look anemic, it doesn't remotely suit the rest of my earthy, olive-green, soft-brown, cardinal-red-is-here-on-provision, plum-is-an-excursion, this-is-who-I'll-be-during-the-day wardrobe and persona. Distinctly awkward. Also, if you plan to keep your current self-style intact, the worst thing to do is go live in a foreign country long enough to absorb the style. I came back with a slate-blue denim jacket with an 80s-huge collar and massive belt at the hem situated around one's RIBS. It's so everything I tend not towards. Yet I love the damned thing, despite having nothing to wear with it, nor even any idea what would look good with it. The complement would be BRONZE, for chrissakes.
You're dead in the middle of the storm when it comes to retail. Really (oh, how I try to avoid the tangents, and they come up anyway), much of the trouble people have in conceiving that we all equally have, y'know, lives, is rooted in the fact that we see so many people everyday. You can only really relate to so many as people before your brain overloads; there was some research done on this that suggested the number was in the vicinity of 150. I think it derives from an evolutionary history of small tribes, personally, but that's rather beside the point; outside of that circle of roughly 150 we stop filling in the gaps with "person" and start accepting fairly flat images of people. Some of us are just less imaginative than others, and don't realize that there is indeed an unknown beyond our own perception.
Re: the artist thing - I've gotten the exact same reaction, but never experienced it in that way. I never felt that people had a hard time seeing me as an artist, probably because all of my life I've been seen as something of an oddity: three feet of hair, delicately built, and feminine, with a loud mouth, no interest in fashion, and a tendency to tromp around in army boots in the woods. Weirdness made the art less incongruous, almost as if it relieved people to find out I liked to draw, as if that explained away all my eccentricities. So when I got that reaction I usually assumed it had more to do with my age, the same way some of my teachers did double takes at certain things I'd say in class or hand in in writing - children under a certain age are presumed simply not to have much capacity for abstract thought and I didn't fit their schema. (Take that, Piaget. I never liked him anyway.) I never had much of an artist "type" in my head - though perhaps I've been a little inoculated by the amount of time I've spent in conversation with artists of all types at ren faires; I mean, look at any of
these guys. I've met a lot of conservatively-dressed, middle-aged, office-appropriate artists, and a great many inked and dyed every chemical shade with more hardware than your average toolkit (I live within two hours of Austin, after all.)
In any case, I think I've spent little enough of my time
looking off-the-rack that people kind of expect a little of the weirdness, and I've always been the highly immature type to enjoy teasing with further contradiction. E.g., certain groups of men will try and broadly schematize the women they're interested in, so as to better figure out how to be impressive. If they catch you bunching up your long cotton skirt to rescue a spider from your shrieking classmates, they'll say something about how they always thought vegetarianism was a higher moral path and wish they had the willpower to stick with it (yes, I've gotten this multiple times, and while one sounded sincere, with most it tends to have a greasy feel of falsehood which is badly exacerbated by the appeal to morality.) For me, puerile and always thrilled to confuse someone into rethinking a situation, this was always the cue to brace against impending laughter, carefully look into their face with a little of the same falsity, wide-eyed artlessness, and state that I've never really subscribed to that morality, and took a nice fat buck last year. And then go to take Arachne's little daughter outside, where I could laugh freely. It's terribly childish, but oh, there's just
nothing like deflating the combined presumptuousness of stereotyping a real human girl, and then using such a phony line to try to appeal to the imagined stereotype.