After a quick look on google, there are dozens of 'expert'
opinions portrayed as facts, CJ. There was even one very
professional video opposing those explaining the building
engineering and effects of the weight above the fire zone -
this was from a few months immediately after the event.
Now, it's lost among all the garbage.
There may be one true explanation among the self-serving
chaff, but who's to know? However, the one major flaw I
see in all the conspiracy theories is the inability of large
groups of people to keep basically anything a secret for long
periods of time. There would be, I think. a niggling need to
blab about something this momentous. Plus, how do they
reliably eliminate the remaining forensic evidence?
I put at least part of the blame on Condoleezza Rice, Sec of
State, for ignoring what came across her desk, especially
the [documented in a congressional investigation] CIA
report that Bin Laden has said there was a coming attack
involving planes against us. She did nothing, admitted that
fact under oath! Meanwhile the terrorists were here taking
flying lessons!
Condoleezza took the facts
and sat on them for forty weeks.
When she saw what she had done
she blamed it all on 42, alone.
[42 being Pres Clinton]
Well, he *was* a naughty man.
I can't say you're wrong, CJ, but calling theories "proven facts"
is too big a reach for me.
Though I've lived within a day's drive of NYC for most of my life,
I've never visited there. Replacement for 7? Don't know.
pip