Comment on Policy Statement by poasterchild
You meeting Feminists doesn't equate to all or most. What you meet, and what other meet, does.
Wikipedia is not a source worth noting. Definitions do not decide the quality of actions. 90% of everything sucks. FEMINISM INCLUDED. NOT THE EXCEPTION.
The definition of Feminism doesn't even stare human rights equality. It states FOR women. Not for all.
Wikipedia is not a source worth noting. Definitions do not decide the quality of actions. 90% of everything sucks. FEMINISM INCLUDED. NOT THE EXCEPTION.
The definition of Feminism doesn't even stare human rights equality. It states FOR women. Not for all.
Comment hidden
MULTIPLE SITES DO NOT EQUATE TO FACT.
Statistics are more often than not bullshit. You do not understand frustration because you lack genuine frustration because you, if you were smart enough, would know that a site does not equate to proving anything.
Someone sent me a rape report by the CDC. You know why it's bullshit? WHAT DOES THE CDC DO?
Rape research?
Crime research?
OR WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO AND REPORT ON DISEASE AND SHIT LIKE MEDICAL STUFF?
The point is that statistics are not proof. No statistic by any such online source would prove superior to a persons personal experience. They're not the cake. They are the icing on the cake. And most GOV sites would not give out such evidence because crime reports by the government are some heavy confidential shit.
Statistics are more often than not bullshit. You do not understand frustration because you lack genuine frustration because you, if you were smart enough, would know that a site does not equate to proving anything.
Someone sent me a rape report by the CDC. You know why it's bullshit? WHAT DOES THE CDC DO?
Rape research?
Crime research?
OR WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO AND REPORT ON DISEASE AND SHIT LIKE MEDICAL STUFF?
The point is that statistics are not proof. No statistic by any such online source would prove superior to a persons personal experience. They're not the cake. They are the icing on the cake. And most GOV sites would not give out such evidence because crime reports by the government are some heavy confidential shit.
Comment hidden
AND YOUR STATISTICS DO NOTHING BUT STATE, AND LEAD TO MORE STATISTICS.
It's not about conspiracies. It's about people abusing the usage of statistics.
If you don't have statistics and personal experience, with personal experience, for an individuals argument, being the bigger aspect, then you're not worth listening to compared to someone who does have both in that order.
And statistics CAN be lying. Statistics can say they have government sources, and their links do nothing but link to the same statement by another site claiming to government websites. Unless it's a .GOV site directly linked, and without a statement on a gender oppression to give off a bias, then any other statistic website MUST link to a source. And eventually those sources MUST link to a .GOV site. And if that .GOV site isn't directly about crime reports and the reports on the averages of them, then it is a .GOV site that isn't being watched enough to make sure that it does what it's supposed to. CDC does not do rape reports. If it does one, then it's clearly released with an agenda in mind.
Imagine someone trying to compare the CDC to reports help by the CIA. You can't because one section doesn't have clearance to other sections. The CDC, or other such less useful in this argument sectors, do not have the clearance for things that would be dealt with by judicial or national security sectors. The CDC is not paid to handle national security and security of the people from themselves.
It's not about conspiracies. It's about people abusing the usage of statistics.
If you don't have statistics and personal experience, with personal experience, for an individuals argument, being the bigger aspect, then you're not worth listening to compared to someone who does have both in that order.
And statistics CAN be lying. Statistics can say they have government sources, and their links do nothing but link to the same statement by another site claiming to government websites. Unless it's a .GOV site directly linked, and without a statement on a gender oppression to give off a bias, then any other statistic website MUST link to a source. And eventually those sources MUST link to a .GOV site. And if that .GOV site isn't directly about crime reports and the reports on the averages of them, then it is a .GOV site that isn't being watched enough to make sure that it does what it's supposed to. CDC does not do rape reports. If it does one, then it's clearly released with an agenda in mind.
Imagine someone trying to compare the CDC to reports help by the CIA. You can't because one section doesn't have clearance to other sections. The CDC, or other such less useful in this argument sectors, do not have the clearance for things that would be dealt with by judicial or national security sectors. The CDC is not paid to handle national security and security of the people from themselves.
Comment hidden
And yet here you are trying to dictate reality through inaccuracies. Thus you are an invalid argument. You seem adamant that you have some special thing making you more right in saying reality is a certain way.
You either fight for female rights in the middle east or you're fighting for bullshit. The West is gynocentric as fuck. Get over it. Female oppression IS FUCKING DONE. GET OVER IT AND FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO DO WITH YOUR LIFE INSTEAD OF POINTING FINGERS AT MEN FOR BEING MEN.
GROW THE FUCK UP.
You either fight for female rights in the middle east or you're fighting for bullshit. The West is gynocentric as fuck. Get over it. Female oppression IS FUCKING DONE. GET OVER IT AND FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO DO WITH YOUR LIFE INSTEAD OF POINTING FINGERS AT MEN FOR BEING MEN.
GROW THE FUCK UP.
Comment hidden
View all replies