"There are plenty of women like me who enjoy big breasts, wide hips and over the top armors in these products."
Yep. I run table top RPGS, usually in the classic sword and sorcery format, but when I changed across to a super hero RPG for a couple of years I noticed something interesting: Sometimes a male player would play a female character & he would create more conservative characters, but the female players playing female characters would almost without exception create large breasted, wide hipped sex goddesses, wearing three square inches of material as a costume, along with a cape & mask.
So the pretense that sexy women exist only to titillate men is obviously not true, women also can find it titillating.
Personally I don't believe it's possible to "objectify" an image. Objectification is the process of treating a person like an object, where as a picture is already an object & not a person. If it were a person, then deviantart is "slave market" & deleting an image from you deviantart account is murder.
"If you gon whine about oversexualized women, be sure to look at the oversexualized men as well."
Also no such thing as oversexualization: it's literally not a word. To be OVER sexualized one would require an objective scale to measure sexual nature & a point along that scale universally recognized as "maximum amount of sexiness." Since we don't have that, what we have when feminists declare this or that is oversexualized is "I personally find this makes me uncomfortable," which is purely subjective conjecture. The term oversexualized exists to make that subjective conjecture sound objective because "this is oversexualized" sounds way more official & fact based then "I personally find this makes me uncomfortable."
Something to keep in mind next time you hear a feminist say something is oversexualized.