Comment on Authentic Citizenship: Part 2 by techgnotic
I appreciate these articles in general, and with this one was inspiring to see how much artists can help other artists. But one thing that really put a shadow over it for me and made me question someone's judgement.
Out of the ten deviants they say should be immediately highlighted, nine are male artists and one is a female 'model' with a front page photo of her masturbating with a title "I mean, who doesn't?" and a journal entry saying that she was extremely broke and desperate to pay a $500 bill, so the first one to "help" her would get a "private, 1 hour live skype session with yours truly".
So, you mention 15 established male artists whose praise has helped your career, and recommend highlighting nine male artists and one woman advertising internet sex. Then the first tip from both these guys is "Absolutely no questionable material on your front page." What kind of standards do you have that foster this kind of thinking?
Out of the ten deviants they say should be immediately highlighted, nine are male artists and one is a female 'model' with a front page photo of her masturbating with a title "I mean, who doesn't?" and a journal entry saying that she was extremely broke and desperate to pay a $500 bill, so the first one to "help" her would get a "private, 1 hour live skype session with yours truly".
So, you mention 15 established male artists whose praise has helped your career, and recommend highlighting nine male artists and one woman advertising internet sex. Then the first tip from both these guys is "Absolutely no questionable material on your front page." What kind of standards do you have that foster this kind of thinking?