DrScottHartman's avatar
Not that I'm aware of. Do you mean the neural spines over the hips?
Sekley's avatar
I found what they were talking out. It was that your skeletal's vertebrael column didn't match the scaling from the 1997 paper.

cdn.discordapp.com/attachments…

cdn.discordapp.com/attachments…

cdn.discordapp.com/attachments…
Sekley's avatar
I might be paraphrasing this wrong, but it was something about the whole spine from the torso to the tail was too large and thus making the animal's linear dimensions too big. I'll ask them about it again because my memory isn't the best.
DrScottHartman's avatar
Ohhhh, that was years ago. When I overhauled it last year to incorporate the new positioning information from Evers et al., 2015 I also updated the scale bar, etc.
Sekley's avatar
So this is the fixed version?