Comment on Stamp: Death to Socialism by Mister-Haro
Yea, and look at how the LGBT advocates for people they claim to represent to be "treated differently because they're different"
How the left is disgustingly racist towards white people, disgustingly sexist towards men ETC.
Also, don't post a chapter of text again or I'm removing your comment as spam (4 paragraphs or less)
How the left is disgustingly racist towards white people, disgustingly sexist towards men ETC.
Also, don't post a chapter of text again or I'm removing your comment as spam (4 paragraphs or less)
....? Didn't know there was a fucking limit to expressing my point of view.
I honestly expected a bit more of a reply...
Pfft, "a chapter of text". Oh so sorry that my rebuttal was so long, but to be fucking fair your point of view was so full of holes it required a more detailed, yet ultimately brief, breakdown of why I found your statements incorrect.
Mm mm mm, this is a fucking first, I'll tell you h'what.
I honestly expected a bit more of a reply...
Pfft, "a chapter of text". Oh so sorry that my rebuttal was so long, but to be fucking fair your point of view was so full of holes it required a more detailed, yet ultimately brief, breakdown of why I found your statements incorrect.
Mm mm mm, this is a fucking first, I'll tell you h'what.
I don't have time for chapters of text
And of course, you being a Collectivist; you resort to baseless claims, and personal attacks.
What about the fact that EVERY Collectivist country fails historically? What about Collectivism's body count? What about Gulags? What about oppression under Collectivist regimes?
Lol; My position has holes... Bullshit.
And of course, you being a Collectivist; you resort to baseless claims, and personal attacks.
What about the fact that EVERY Collectivist country fails historically? What about Collectivism's body count? What about Gulags? What about oppression under Collectivist regimes?
Lol; My position has holes... Bullshit.
I literally did not personally attack you. Tell me where I called you names or said anything other than I thought that your point of view had "holes", because guess what sweetheart, every point of view has holes in it because it's impossible for someone to consider every single element and incorporate it equally into a single argument, because something has to take prominence over other things or it just becomes a textbook instead of a narrative.
And I never claimed I was collectivist. I'm critical of every political system. You want me to deconstruct Mao's China and its doomed-to-fail ideology and disastrous policies? Because I can do that. I can do that to feudalism, pre-Progressive era Capitalism, current-era capitalism, Communist Russia, etc.
And "collectivist" is simply a philosophy where the group is valued over the individual, which is a part of many, many cultures. Japan is still standing, China is still standing, South Korea, and all that. All of them, even China, have been able to combine capitalism as an economic system and preserve their culture of the community over the individual.
And I never claimed I was collectivist. I'm critical of every political system. You want me to deconstruct Mao's China and its doomed-to-fail ideology and disastrous policies? Because I can do that. I can do that to feudalism, pre-Progressive era Capitalism, current-era capitalism, Communist Russia, etc.
And "collectivist" is simply a philosophy where the group is valued over the individual, which is a part of many, many cultures. Japan is still standing, China is still standing, South Korea, and all that. All of them, even China, have been able to combine capitalism as an economic system and preserve their culture of the community over the individual.
So you are making a claim you can't substantiate. Cool.
And what you're describing is a TYPE of Collectivism (which also failed), but your definition is also inaccurate.
Collectivism is treating EVERYONE and EVERYTHING as a collective (for example: someone attacks one woman = they're attacking all women).
But ECONOMIC and SOCIAL Collectivism is Marxist www.merriam-webster.com/dictio…
This is just an indisputable fact; "White Privilege" for example is an example of Identitarian Collectivism.
Don't bother responding if all you're going to do is say "DURRR!!! U R RONG!!!" (make claims you need to substantiate and refuse to do so).
I can do that to. *ahem* YOU HAVE AIDS!
I refuse to substantiate my claims because you're arguments have holes in them!
See how your crap falls apart so easily after just a teeny-tiny bit of evaluation? That should tell you something.
Also, don't condescend to me. My arguments and position here is literally better than yours in every conceivable way.
And yes you did insult me: comments.deviantart.com/1/3768…
Even in this comment you did: "because guess what sweetheart". So you're blatantly lying on top of using retarded mental contortions.
And what you're describing is a TYPE of Collectivism (which also failed), but your definition is also inaccurate.
Collectivism is treating EVERYONE and EVERYTHING as a collective (for example: someone attacks one woman = they're attacking all women).
But ECONOMIC and SOCIAL Collectivism is Marxist www.merriam-webster.com/dictio…
This is just an indisputable fact; "White Privilege" for example is an example of Identitarian Collectivism.
Don't bother responding if all you're going to do is say "DURRR!!! U R RONG!!!" (make claims you need to substantiate and refuse to do so).
I can do that to. *ahem* YOU HAVE AIDS!
I refuse to substantiate my claims because you're arguments have holes in them!
See how your crap falls apart so easily after just a teeny-tiny bit of evaluation? That should tell you something.
Also, don't condescend to me. My arguments and position here is literally better than yours in every conceivable way.
And yes you did insult me: comments.deviantart.com/1/3768…
Even in this comment you did: "because guess what sweetheart". So you're blatantly lying on top of using retarded mental contortions.