Comment on Superman vs. Batman by JudgesCourt
Too much crotch emphasis. But funneh.
I didnt MAKE you stare at their packages
Actually, in the act of slapping down unnecessary details in unexpected places, thereby drawing the viewer's attention to that spot, you did in fact make me as well as any other viewer look (if not "stare"; not sure where you got that from) at their crotches.
And that's terrible.
And that's terrible.
I don't think those details are unnecessary, in fact they are VERY necessary to the joke. In version 1 we see Batman is better drawn, with larger muscles and an exaggerated package. He ultimately wins this duel because of the bias behind the person who draws the actual comics I am parodying. In version 2 it is the opposite; Superman is drawn as the grander hero with an equally grand package.
It is the subtle things like this that really take crappy Flash animations to a higher level then the ones made by people with too many fans, taking liberties with jokes made famous by Family Guy and the like.
Never the less, thank you for watching.
It is the subtle things like this that really take crappy Flash animations to a higher level then the ones made by people with too many fans, taking liberties with jokes made famous by Family Guy and the like.
Never the less, thank you for watching.
"Subtle"?
Do you not agree with the context in which that word was used or are you just not familiar with the english language?
Context. Subtle, it was not. Incidentally, funny though it may have been, it wasn't exactly on "a higher level", either. Not sure where you're getting that.
It's not like I zoomed in on their cocks, it was up to the viewer to take notice and you have no one but yourself to blame for where your eyes were fixed during the cartoon.
However if I DID zoom in you might be able to read the little sign that says "Eat me."
However if I DID zoom in you might be able to read the little sign that says "Eat me."
View all replies