I know it's not nude, but nude is better than this (if done right). And this isn't a dancer, or at least the picture doesn't give that impression. Dancing shows a kind of elegance, it's an art in itself. Dancing and this picture I think are very different, and even with her clothes on, I do get the impression, "Come and take me." she's on a bed, her legs are wide open, and she's wearing suggestive clothing and in a suggestive pose.
Perhaps the story is she's a prostitute...?
I guess i grow up in different century ...for me ( as i am a girl on the photo ) it nothing more then sexy moment , morning , making nice pose for camera, stretching on the bed in sexy lingery ....
You never see dancers in similar outfits i guess ?
I am not trying to increase my qualities but if you dont see elegance in that photo i understand that your idea of elegance far from meaning of it word
You never see dancers in similar outfits i guess ?
I am not trying to increase my qualities but if you dont see elegance in that photo i understand that your idea of elegance far from meaning of it word
saju you're right, your photos are perfect. uninvited
The meaning of the word elegance is an opinion, and I did say we both had different views on art. I have seen dancers in similar outfits, but they're dancers, and they're usually dancing(which i said earlier, is an art within itself). They're not spreading their legs on a bed unless it's a particular dance move, or if a move calls for it. I've even seen it in plays, but the theater itself is art.
Your picture, again, in my opinion, is different from both scenarios. And trust me, we do grow up in the same century (I was born in 1996)i've just seen too many pictures platter the media that look exactly like yours, and they all tend to lack originality and effort. The majority will turn towards your style of "art", your pictures because they like it, it's what society provided civilization with. We grow accustomed to it to the point where we can't live without it. I'm tired of it though, it's boring and like I said before, lacks originality.
You're picture is the same as the next when it comes to a "sexy moment" or "sexy lingery..." I can turn on a television and see thousands of you splattered across the channels, it takes no effort or time.
I'm a pencil artist, so perhaps that's where our views differ. My work usually takes time (and i'm not saying yours doesn't) and imagination. Not something I can snap with a camera, I have to create it.
Again, this is all just my opinion, save for a few things. And don't get me wrong, you're a beautiful girl, but that's all...I can see thousands of you on google, millions of you on television. It's not different, not unique, just there for society to chive at.
Photography and posing is also art within itselfe ....it is visual visual art as dancing and it required a lot of skills as from photographer and model to create beautiful photo a alot of skills that i telling you in case beside drawing you never did photography and dont know how difficult to make beautiful shot
Yeah, certain type of photography, not all. And besides, everything I said was just my opinion.
Troll. If you don't like then go find kittens. Respect the model.
your* I absolutely apologize for that typo.
Haha. I'll bet you typed that one-handedly. 
The picture itself is not really one begging for respect, is it? In fact it seems to be the opposite. Also notice how literally every comment here is from a male.
The picture itself is not really one begging for respect, is it? In fact it seems to be the opposite. Also notice how literally every comment here is from a male.That said, I don't necessarily think it doesn't belong here. But trolling isn't defined as someone who simply has a different perspective than you're own. He's not trying to upset anyone or start a fight, he's just expressing his viewpoint.
So, let me get this straight - people who appreciate beautiful women in pretty lingerie are .... what exactly?
As for him not trying to upset anyone or start a fight - my viewpoint differs entirely from yours.
As for him not trying to upset anyone or start a fight - my viewpoint differs entirely from yours.
How am I to answer that? They could be anything, really. What you appreciate does shape your identity to extent, but the possibilities are far too vast for me to answer that for you. I don't know your intent in asking such a vague question. What I said was the way she is dressed and posed is not something that demands respect, but rather something that evokes lustful thoughts and emotions-- which surely was her intent with the image, unless I'm wrong and there really is some meaning behind it.
I'm not questioning its validity of art, but if I were to do so, it certainly would not be disrespectful. I believe he was very reasonable with what he had to say, and did not seem to intend to start an argument or upset anyone. You're playing the white-knight that no one asked for.
Your viewpoint is different than my own-- and that's great! It's unique to you. It's great to recognize that.
My first comment was due to your 'one-handed' statement.......
View all replies
I'm no troll, and like I said earlier, it's my opinion.
And it's my opinion that you're a troll.......
dude, this is a place for comments and opinions, why do you have a need to shut somebody up...?
and why do YOU have to interfere in that dialogue, if that picture is not even yours?! o.0
I hope you see the irony in you actually posing that last question ..... If not there probably isn't any point in me answering the first.
View all replies
Okay.