I know his move towards movies has been an on-going discussion, but it seemed to me that the discussions were starting to pick up steam. Pardon me if I misunderstand that.
I never said he doesn't deserve it, and I'm not at all against rewarding someone for success in their artistic endeavours. I thought I made that part kind of clear.
I just find it interesting that such an oversight was made for this award.
I never said he doesn't deserve it, and I'm not at all against rewarding someone for success in their artistic endeavours. I thought I made that part kind of clear.
I just find it interesting that such an oversight was made for this award.
It's not really that interesting. It's a simple error made by me, nothing more, nothing less. I'll certainly make sure that such a thing isn't possible again.
Why not revoke the second award? Does that not seem like the logical thing to do? Deviousness seems like one of those things in life that you only get once, and I was impressed upon that that's exactly what it is--a one-time deal.
Or can it be legitimately received multiple times? 
This is certainly the first I've heard of it being awarded to the same person more than just once. I'm not saying he didn't deserve it the first time, but receiving it a second time (even through error), and then keeping it afterward with no further action, even after it's known that it's his second time? Seems a little off.
This is certainly the first I've heard of it being awarded to the same person more than just once. I'm not saying he didn't deserve it the first time, but receiving it a second time (even through error), and then keeping it afterward with no further action, even after it's known that it's his second time? Seems a little off.