Comment on Creationism Outbreak by doctormo
i loled (by the way atheism was proven wrong years ago and creationism can be scientifically explained)
Huh?
How was atheism proven wrong? And how do you explain creationism?
How was atheism proven wrong? And how do you explain creationism?
WTF atheism is right and there is no scientifically correct study that proves atheism wrong but there are many studies that proves religion wrong and anyone smart will realise that atheism is the truth as long as they are not forced to belive from a early age. and science is slowly winning the "battle" as we gain more knowlage my guess is that it vill be rare or gone altogether (in the western world) in 300 or 400 years
The fact that religion (ANY religion) cannot be proven either way frustrates me. People insist on claiming that their religion is factual, when they can't really prove it. That's part of the definition of religion: it's based on beliefs.
When you look at many religious beliefs with scientific eyes, most parts of religion fall apart: the sun is not rolled across the sky each day, for example, and the rain is not tears of the angels. In these regards, religion is wrong.
However, where religion and science truly clash is in attempting to define the undefinable: is there a god? (Or more than one?) What happens to the soul after death? (Does the soul even exist?) In these regards, religion isn't wrong, nor is it right. There simply isn't a provable answer either way, and so we argue endlessly in circles.
Perhaps religion's greatest purpose is that it gives us a set of moral guidelines, and comforts us in our darker moments. Given the choice, which would you rather believe happens after death: that you are reunited with your deceased loved ones, or that you simply cease to exist? Religion may not always be right, but I doubt it will go away anytime soon.
When you look at many religious beliefs with scientific eyes, most parts of religion fall apart: the sun is not rolled across the sky each day, for example, and the rain is not tears of the angels. In these regards, religion is wrong.
However, where religion and science truly clash is in attempting to define the undefinable: is there a god? (Or more than one?) What happens to the soul after death? (Does the soul even exist?) In these regards, religion isn't wrong, nor is it right. There simply isn't a provable answer either way, and so we argue endlessly in circles.
Perhaps religion's greatest purpose is that it gives us a set of moral guidelines, and comforts us in our darker moments. Given the choice, which would you rather believe happens after death: that you are reunited with your deceased loved ones, or that you simply cease to exist? Religion may not always be right, but I doubt it will go away anytime soon.
religion cannot be proved wrong neither can atheism no matter what studies say nothing about the creation of the universe can be proven right or wrong it a fact
You say "religion" as if they are all alike.
Atheism is easy to prove wrong, whilst Apatheism can not be proven wrong (see my gallery)
atheism has so many holes and evolution was proven wrong because DNA just simply doesnt work like "things change over time" in DNA humans and monkies are 45,000,000 neurotides apart and a change of 3 neurotides over time is extremely fatal
nucleotides are the smallest unit of measuring dna, at an almoat molecular level. So saying however many million nucleotides apart is deliberate misinformation and exaggeration. I doubt you were even stating facts though.
I'm just curious, was evolution proven wrong before or after it was directly observed?
By the way, the fact that you just said "neurotides" demonstrates that you don't really know what you're talking about.
By the way, the fact that you just said "neurotides" demonstrates that you don't really know what you're talking about.
And yet 100 changes or even shifts can be not fatal at all. It depends on the changes and depends on the number of available attempts you get try at making a workable new life.
It's all mathematics, nothing to do with biology at all really.
So I believe that in order to prevent damaging evolution, we should all have lots of sex. This is to ensure that workable clones can be produced in each new generation.
It's all mathematics, nothing to do with biology at all really.
So I believe that in order to prevent damaging evolution, we should all have lots of sex. This is to ensure that workable clones can be produced in each new generation.
"we should all have lots of sex."... are you hitting on me?
bow chicka bow bow!
Hell no, I'm married. We should _all_ (everyone in the world) have lots of sex.
It's good for us.
It's good for us.
you know i was joking when i said "are you hitting on me?" right?
I have dry wit 2.0 installed.
View all replies