- Actually, if you wanna get really picky, one of the rules state "Do not redistribute model data", which seems odd considering TDA also allows edits. So sounds to me like redistribution is allowed when edits have been made. But the edits can't deviate from the style of the models, according to another clause. So these rules are really just a convoluted mess that don't make a lot of sense, once you dig into them.
- Again, these are rules and guidelines. They're not law. But you're right, they totally do have the right to take it down if they made the parts from scratch and didn't edit any of it from someone elses work previously. The problem with MMD is that 99% of the models rely on fair use to even be allowed. Something I'm exercising. Sure, companies don't take down all fanart or imports, but it's for some pretty good reasons: For instance, they know it all comes back to them eventually anyway. And like you said, mods are in a legal gray zone. So we're all in this together, right? Right. 🤷
-Thing is I really don't have to ask 18 people if I can use their assets in a software other than MMD, when the plugins for such imports are widely and popularly available. They might not like it, but honestly there's nothing they can do short of asking me not to release the finished work. I'm gonna go ahead and PM all the people in that list and we'll see what happens next.
And yeah, you're backpedaling. You were really hammering that VR-point, even going as far as suggesting alternatives. Now that's a point that didn't work out in your favor, so now the beat of the drum is different.
I'm just saying it becomes grossly ironic that the models you suggest people use instead are the models I'm already modifying anyway lmao.