Comment on Physiologus's profile
If anthromorphic creatures are not allowed in this group, why is it that I've spotted several antrhomorphic-looking pieces in several folders? O.o
"Anthropomorphic-looking" is not the same thing as being explicitly labeled as "anthro/furry". And, as I said, in the end it comes down to my personal choice whether I consider something furry enough to be declined or not based on my own preferences.
Look, I am not talking about you in general. I never ever said I disagreed with your rule, right? No, I did not. I said I don't get why there is so many people who label things as furry just because of hundreds and thousands of groups and all that. I don't think it's a big deal. I am not talking about your group in particular either... 
If it has nothing to do with me, my rule or my group, why are you even bringing it up here? Isn't that something more appropriate for a forum or your own personal journal?
I've said what I needed to say and fully addressed your question. If you have any other problem with how I or anyone in general regard furries and their ilk, you should probably move the conversation somewhere more suitable for it. It doesn't belong here.
I've said what I needed to say and fully addressed your question. If you have any other problem with how I or anyone in general regard furries and their ilk, you should probably move the conversation somewhere more suitable for it. It doesn't belong here.